Literature DB >> 25948688

Movements of genes between populations: are pollinators more effective at transferring their own or plant genetic markers?

Min Liu1, Stephen G Compton2, Fo-En Peng1, Jian Zhang1, Xiao-Yong Chen3.   

Abstract

The transfer of genes between populations is increasingly important in a world where pollinators are declining, plant and animal populations are increasingly fragmented and climate change is forcing shifts in distribution. The distances that pollen can be transported by small insects are impressive, as is the extensive gene flow between their own populations. We compared the relative ease by which small insects introduce genetic markers into their own and host-plant populations. Gene flow via seeds and pollen between populations of an Asian fig species were evaluated using cpDNA and nuclear DNA markers, and between-population gene flow of its pollinator fig wasp was determined using microsatellites. This insect is the tree's only pollinator locally, and only reproduces in its figs. The plant's pollen-to-seed dispersal ratio was 9.183-9.437, smaller than that recorded for other Ficus. The relative effectiveness of the pollinator at introducing markers into its own populations was higher than the rate it introduced markers into the plant's populations (ratio = 14 : 1), but given the demographic differences between plant and pollinator, pollen transfer effectiveness is remarkably high. Resource availability affects the dispersal of fig wasps, and host-plant flowering phenology here and in other plant-pollinator systems may strongly influence relative gene flow rates.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Agaonidae; Ficus; Slatkin's paradox; gene flow; insect dispersal; seed dispersal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948688      PMCID: PMC4455804          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Comparing relative rates of pollen and seed gene flow in the island model using nuclear and organelle measures of population structure.

Authors:  Matthew B Hamilton; Judith R Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effects of landscape fragmentation on pollination dynamics: absence of evidence not evidence of absence.

Authors:  Adam S Hadley; Matthew G Betts
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-11-17

4.  The genetical structure of populations.

Authors:  S WRIGHT
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1951-03

5.  Unified framework to evaluate panmixia and migration direction among multiple sampling locations.

Authors:  Peter Beerli; Michal Palczewski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Effects of inbreeding and interpopulation crosses on performance and plasticity of two generations of offspring of a declining grassland plant.

Authors:  Tania J Walisch; Guy Colling; Myriam Poncelet; Diethart Matthies
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 7.  Is gene flow the most important evolutionary force in plants?

Authors:  Norman C Ellstrand
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Ficus racemosa is pollinated by a single population of a single agaonid wasp species in continental South-East Asia.

Authors:  N Kobmoo; M Hossaert-McKey; J Y Rasplus; F Kjellberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  The population genetics of a solitary oligolectic sweat bee, Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) oenotherae (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).

Authors:  A Zayed; L Packer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 10.  Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change.

Authors:  Antoine Kremer; Ophélie Ronce; Juan J Robledo-Arnuncio; Frédéric Guillaume; Gil Bohrer; Ran Nathan; Jon R Bridle; Richard Gomulkiewicz; Etienne K Klein; Kermit Ritland; Anna Kuparinen; Sophie Gerber; Silvio Schueler
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  2 in total

1.  Plant geographic phenotypic variation drives diversification in its associated community of a phytophagous insect and its parasitoids.

Authors:  Hui Yu; Dan Liang; Enwei Tian; Linna Zheng; Finn Kjellberg
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 2.  Landscape Genetics of Plants: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Mitchell B Cruzan; Elizabeth C Hendrickson
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-07-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.