Literature DB >> 25948657

Eight-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel.

W Grant Stevens1, Jennifer Harrington1, Kaveh Alizadeh1, David Broadway1, Kamakshi Zeidler1, Tess B Godinez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On March 9, 2012, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Sientra's premarket approval application for its portfolio of silicone gel breast implants based on their review of Sientra's 3-year study data from the largest pivotal silicone gel breast implant study to date. This included the first approval of shaped breast implants in the United States.
OBJECTIVES: The authors provide an update to the 8-year safety and effectiveness of the Sientra High-Strength silicone gel breast implants.
METHODS: The Sientra Core study is an ongoing 10 year open-label, prospective, multi-center clinical study, which includes 1788 patients implanted with 3506 Sientra implants across four indications (Primary Augmentation, Revision Augmentation, Primary Reconstruction, and Revision Reconstruction). For the safety analysis, the incidence of post-operative complications, including all breast implant-related adverse effects (eg, infection, asymmetry), was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier risk rates. The effectiveness analyses include surgeon and patient satisfaction and changes in bra/cup size.
RESULTS: Through 8 years, the overall risk of rupture was 4.6%, the risk of capsular contracture was 11.8% (rates were lower when using True Texture™), and the risk of reoperation was 28.3%. Out of the 580 reoperations in 456 patients, over half of all reoperations were due to cosmetic reasons (n = 299). The most common reasons for reoperation were capsular contracture (19.0%), style and/or size change (18.4%), and asymmetry (8.8%). Patient satisfaction remains high through 8 years, with 87% indicating that their breast implants make them feel more feminine than prior to enrollment.
CONCLUSIONS: Safety data from the FDA Core study continues to support a comprehensive safety and effectiveness profile of Sientra's portfolio of round and shaped implants through 8 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Therapeutic.
© 2015 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948657     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  5 in total

1.  Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Nima Khavanin; Mark W Clemens; Andrea L Pusic; Neil A Fine; Jennifer B Hamill; H Myra Kim; Ji Qi; Edwin G Wilkins; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Breast implant illness: a topic in review.

Authors:  Jordan Kaplan; Rod Rohrich
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Plastic Surgeons Defend Textured Breast Implants at 2019 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Hearing: Why It Is Time to Reconsider.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-30

4.  A 10-Year Prospective Study of Implant-Based Breast Augmentation and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert El-Haddad; Béatrice Lafarge-Claoue; Charles Garabedian; Sylvain Staub
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2018-02-08

5.  Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study).

Authors:  Julie Khanna; Mathew Mosher; Paul Whidden; Sébastien Nguyen; Diego Garzon; Meetu Bhogal
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.