Literature DB >> 25948379

Investigations on sediment toxicity of German rivers applying a standardized bioassay battery.

Christoph Hafner1, Stefan Gartiser2, Manuel Garcia-Käufer2,3, Sabrina Schiwy3, Christoph Hercher2, Wiebke Meyer4, Christine Achten4, Maria Larsson5, Magnus Engwall5, Steffen Keiter3,5, Henner Hollert3.   

Abstract

River sediments may contain a huge variety of environmental contaminants and play a key role in the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems. Contaminants adsorbed to sediments and suspended solids may contribute directly or after remobilization to an adverse ecological and chemical status of surface water. In this subproject of the joint research project DanTox, acetonic Soxhlet extracts from three German river sediments from the River Rhine (Altrip and Ehrenbreitstein with moderate contamination) and River Elbe (Veringkanal Hamburg heavily contaminated) were prepared and redissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). These extracts were analyzed with a standard bioassay battery with organisms from different trophic levels (bacteria, algae, Daphnia, fish) as well as in the Ames test and the umuC test for bacterial mutagenicity and genotoxicity according to the respective OECD and ISO guidelines. In total, 0.01% (standard) up to 0.25% (only fish embryo test) of the DMSO sediment extract was dosed to the test systems resulting in maximum sediment equivalent concentrations (SEQ) of 2 up to 50 g l(-1). The sediment of Veringkanal near Hamburg harbor was significantly more toxic in most tests compared to the sediment extracts from Altrip and Ehrenbreitstein from the River Rhine. The most toxic effect found for Veringkanal was in the algae test with an ErC50 (72 h) of 0.00226 g l(-1) SEQ. Ehrenbreitstein and Altrip samples were about factor 1,000 less toxic. In the Daphnia, Lemna, and acute fish toxicity tests, no toxicity at all was found at 2 g l(-1) SEQ. corresponding to 0.01% DMSO. Only when increasing the DMSO concentration the fish embryo test showed a 22-fold higher toxicity for Veringkanal than for Ehrenbreitstein and Altrip samples, while the toxicity difference was less evident for the Daphnia test due to the overlaying solvent toxicity above 0.05% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The higher toxicities observed with the Veringkanal sample are supported by the PAH and PCB concentrations analyzed in the sediments. The sediment extracts of Altrip and Veringkanal were mutagenic in the Ames tester strain TA98 with metabolic activation (S9-mix). The findings allow a better ecotoxicological characterization of the sediments extensively analyzed in all subprojects of the DanTox project (e.g., Garcia-Kaeufer et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3894-4 , 2014; Schiwy et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3185-0 , 2014; Hollert and Keiter 2015). In the absence of agreed limit values for sediment extracts in standard tests, further data with unpolluted reference sediments are required for a quantitative risk assessment of the investigated polluted sediments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algae growth inhibition test; Ames test; Daphnia acute toxicity test; Ecotoxicology; Fish acute toxicity test; Lemna growth inhibition test; Luminescent bacteria test; Mutagenicity; Sediment; Soxhlet extract; umuC test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948379     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4482-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  29 in total

1.  A novel contact assay for testing genotoxicity of chemicals and whole sediments in zebrafish embryos.

Authors:  Thomas Kosmehl; Arnold V Hallare; Georg Reifferscheid; Werner Manz; Thomas Braunbeck; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  The risk of altering soil and sediment samples upon extract preparation for analytical and bio-analytical investigations--a review.

Authors:  Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Tobias Schulze; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  A novel contact assay for testing aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-mediated toxicity of chemicals and whole sediments in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos.

Authors:  Sabrina Schiwy; Jennifer Bräunig; Henriette Alert; Henner Hollert; Steffen H Keiter
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Contaminated sediments and bioassay responses of three macroinvertebrates, the midge larva Chironomus riparius, the water louse Asellus aquaticus and the mayfly nymph Ephoron virgo.

Authors:  H J De Lange; E M De Haas; H Maas; E T H M Peeters
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Approach for detecting mutagenicity of biodegraded and ozonated pharmaceuticals, metabolites and transformation products from a drinking water perspective.

Authors:  Stefan Gartiser; Christoph Hafner; Kerstin Kronenberger-Schäfer; Oliver Happel; Christoph Trautwein; Klaus Kümmerer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Genotoxic and teratogenic effect of freshwater sediment samples from the Rhine and Elbe River (Germany) in zebrafish embryo using a multi-endpoint testing strategy.

Authors:  M Garcia-Käufer; S Gartiser; C Hafner; S Schiwy; S Keiter; C Gründemann; H Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Testing sediment biological effects with the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca: the gap between laboratory and nature.

Authors:  Feiyue Wang; Richard R Goulet; Peter M Chapman
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Comparison of in vitro and in situ genotoxicity in the Danube River by means of the comet assay and the micronucleus test.

Authors:  Melanie Boettcher; Stefanie Grund; Steffen Keiter; Thomas Kosmehl; Georg Reifferscheid; Nadja Seitz; Paula Suares Rocha; Henner Hollert; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Responses in sediment bioassays used in the Netherlands: can observed toxicity be explained by routinely monitored priority pollutants?

Authors:  Joost Lahr; Johanna L Maas-Diepeveen; Suzanne C Stuijfzand; Pim E G Leonards; Jeanette M Drüke; Simone Lücker; Albert Espeldoorn; Lia C M Kerkum; Leo L P van Stee; A Jan Hendriks
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Analysis of POPs in human samples reveal a contribution of brominated dioxin of up to 15% of the total dioxin TEQ.

Authors:  Ingrid Ericson Jogsten; Jessika Hagberg; Gunilla Lindström; Bert van Bavel
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  8 in total

1.  Danio rerio as a model in aquatic toxicology and sediment research.

Authors:  H Hollert; Steffen H Keiter
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Acetylcholinesterase in zebrafish embryos as a tool to identify neurotoxic effects in sediments.

Authors:  Britta Kais; Daniel Stengel; Annika Batel; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Time-dependent expression and activity of cytochrome P450 1s in early life-stages of the zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Jennifer Bräunig; Sabrina Schiwy; Oliver Broedel; Yvonne Müller; Marcus Frohme; Henner Hollert; Steffen H Keiter
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Evaluation of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a co-solvent for toxicity testing of hydrophobic organic compounds.

Authors:  Jakub J Modrzyński; Jan H Christensen; Kristian K Brandt
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Genotoxic and teratogenic effect of freshwater sediment samples from the Rhine and Elbe River (Germany) in zebrafish embryo using a multi-endpoint testing strategy.

Authors:  M Garcia-Käufer; S Gartiser; C Hafner; S Schiwy; S Keiter; C Gründemann; H Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Environmental Impacts of Biosurfactants from a Life Cycle Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Briem; Lars Bippus; Amira Oraby; Philipp Noll; Susanne Zibek; Stefan Albrecht
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.635

7.  Bioluminescent Vibrio fischeri Assays in the Assessment of Seasonal and Spatial Patterns in Toxicity of Contaminated River Sediments.

Authors:  Sergio Jarque; Petr Masner; Jana Klánová; Roman Prokeš; Ludek Bláha
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  A Simple and Effective Method for Extracting Potential Mutagens from Sediment Samples in the Classroom Laboratory Setting.

Authors:  Catalina Durán; Valentina Blanco; Claudia Piccini; Pablo Zunino; Eliana Rodríguez
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2018-04-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.