Hispano-Americans in Europe: what do we know about their health status and determinants? A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Policy makers and health practitioners are in need of guidance to respond to the growing geographic mobility of Hispano-American migrants in Europe. Drawing from contributions from epidemiology, social sciences, demography, psychology, psychiatry and economy, this scoping review provides an up-to-date and comprehensive synthesis of studies addressing the health status and determinants of this population. We describe major research gaps and suggest specific avenues of further inquiry.
METHODS: We identified systematically papers that addressed the concepts "health" and "Hispano Americans" indexed in five data bases from Jan 1990 to May 2014 with no language restrictions. We screened the 4,464 citations retrieved against exclusion criteria and classified 193 selected references in 12 thematic folders with the aid of the reference management software ENDNOTE X6. After reviewing the full text of all papers we extracted relevant data systematically into a table template to facilitate the synthesising process.
RESULTS: Most studies focused on a particular disease, leaving unexplored the interlinkages between different health conditions and how these relate to legislative, health services, environmental, occupational, and other health determinants. We elucidated some consistent results but there were many heterogeneous findings and several popular beliefs were not fully supported by empirical evidence. Few studies adopted a trans-national perspective and many consisted of cross-sectional descriptions that considered "Hispano-Americans" as a homogeneous category, limiting our analysis. Our results are also constrained by the availability and varying quality of studies reviewed.
CONCLUSIONS: Burgeoning research has produced some consistent findings but there are huge gaps in knowledge. To prevent unhelpful generalisations we need a more holistic and nuanced understanding of how mobility, ethnicity, income, gender, legislative status, employment status, working conditions, neighbourhood characteristics and social status intersect with demographic variables and policy contexts to influence the health of the diverse Hispano-American populations present in Europe.

Background

The last fifteen years have seen a dramatic increase in the population of Hispano-American (HA) origin residing in Europe, with numbers estimated at 2.7 million according to EUROSTAT data in 2011. Spain, in particular, experienced massive migration from South-American countries between 2000 and 2007, where approximately 1,850,000 Hispano-Americans (HAs) registered as new citizens in the National Statistics System (INE).

More recently, the economic recession and high unemployment rates in South-European countries have caused secondary migration flows predominantly directed back to the countries of origin (Additional file 1), but also to the United States and other European countries including the UK, Germany, France, The Netherlands and Switzerland (Additional file 2). In London for example, the HA population has recently increased four-fold placing the UK amongst the European countries with the largest HA population outside of the Mediterranean area [1]. In Switzerland, the majority of undocumented migrants residing in Geneva [2] and Lausanne [3] originate from HA countries.

This relatively new migrant group is composed mainly of persons born in Ecuador, Colombia, Bolivia, Peru and Argentina, who migrate for economic reasons and are employed in low-skilled sectors including services, construction, domestic work and personal care. In Spain, the Hispano-American population has benefited from a “positive selection” legislation including facilities to obtain the Spanish nationality after two years of continued residence in Spain, as opposed to the 10-year requested for migrants of other origins. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Article 45) grants these new European citizens with full rights to look for a job in another EU country, work there without needing a work permit, residing there for that purpose, staying even after employment has finished, and enjoy equal treatment as EU-born populations in access to employment, working conditions and all other social and tax advantages. With an estimated 583,800 HAs having obtained a Spanish passport between 2004 and 2012 and persistently high unemployment rates in this country, a continuing increase of secondary migratory flows of these new European citizens within the EU is a plausible scenario.

Given that HA immigration to Europe is a relatively new phenomenon, little is known about the health status and its determinants among this population. The extended body of literature on “Latinos’ health” in North-America is of limited applicability to the European context due to divergent legislative frameworks and migrant population profiles.

With the growing dispersion of HAs beyond Mediterranean Europe, there is an increasing need to further our understanding of their most compelling health needs. A broad perspective is needed to account for such needs, transcending the traditional narrow focus on individuals’ health status and “risk behaviours” to account more comprehensively for the various layers of determinants that affect populations’ health, from the individual level to the immediate social environment and the broader social and economic structures of our societies, so “the causes of the causes” are duly accounted for [4].

As part of a larger project financed by the European Commission 7th Framework Programme (COHEMI- Coordinating Resources to Assess and Improve the Health of Hispano American Migrants in Europe) this scoping review provides an up-to-date and comprehensive synthesis of the state of the art on this matter in order to inform a research agenda. Drawing on contributions from the social and medical sciences, demography, epidemiology, psychology, psychiatry and economy, we identify current gaps in knowledge and propose specific avenues for future research.

Methods

We searched systematically the electronic databases EMBASE, GLOBAL HEALTH, MEDLINE/PubMed and SOCIAL POLICY AND PRACTICE using the platform OVID and employing a combination of terms that covered the concepts “Migrant” and “Hispano American”. We adjusted the search strategy iteratively through various scoping searches before we produced a final version. We searched papers published since January 1990 and up to May 2014, with no language restrictions. We also conducted a systematic search through the regional Latin-American database LILACS (“Literatura Latino-Americana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud”) (Table 1). Book chapters and unpublished documents (“grey literature”) were identified by hand-searching citations in the papers reviewed and through web pages of institutions dealing with migrants’ health. This documentation was not reviewed systematically but informed the discussion of our findings.

Table 1

Search strategy

	Concept and search fields
Data base	Migrant	Hispano-American
Embase 1980–2014 (Week 20)	inmigr*,immigr*,emigr*, migrant*	central america*, south america*, southamerica*, latin america*, latinamerica*,hispano america*,hispanoamerica*, ibero america*, iberoamerica*,iberian america*, hispanic america*, andean* argentin*, bolivia*, chile*, colombia*,costa rica*, costarica*, cuba*, ecuador*, equador*, salvador*, guatemala*, hondura*, mexic*, nicaragua*, panama*, paraguay*, peru*, puerto ric*, puertoric*, dominican*, uruguay*, venezuel*
Global Health 1910–2014 (Week 19)	Search fields: subject heading,title
Ovid MEDLINE (R) 1946- May 2014 (Week 2)
Social Policy and Practice, 2014-04
		Search fields:subject heading, title,abstract
LILACS	migracion$, migrante$, inmigra$, emigra$
	Search fields: key word

*/$ = truncation symbols used as substitutes for any string of zero or more characters in the search terms.

The OVID search yielded 4,216 citations (Additional file 3) and we identified 248 additional references through LILACS. We excluded duplicated studies, conference proceedings, studies not conducted in Europe, and those that did not present specific findings related to HAs in their abstract. We also excluded studies focused on Tripanosoma Cruzi/Chagas disease, which is highly prevalent in some HA populations [5], because at least 9 previous systematic reviews have already examined this topic [6-14]. Taking into account the conceptual difficulties related to grouping HA migrants as an analytical category and the conundrums of defining who is a “migrant” [15] we pragmatically considered “HA migrants in Europe” as persons born in any Spanish-speaking country situated in Central-South America/Caribbean, who are currently residing or have ever resided in any European country. The complete citation screening process was conducted by the first author (MR). A second researcher (JML) screened independently 5% of the references retrieved and a 99% agreement resulted from this exercise. The process for selecting studies is described in Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA flow chart of citations.

All the citations retrieved through OVID were exported into the reference management software ENDNOTE X6. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 193 references were retained for review. Guided by socio-ecological frameworks [16] we classified citations into 12 thematic folders to account for the different factors that influence individuals’ health, from the individual level to health services and broader contextual factors. We read the full text of all the studies selected and extracted data systematically using a template that included information on the study site, design, study population, sample size and key findings. The tables resulting from this process are included as additional files (Additional file 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15). The PRISMA check list form is provided as Additional file 16.

Results

Of the 193 studies reviewed, most focused on the health status of HAs, including communicable diseases (38%), non-communicable diseases (17%), maternal and child health (14%), and emotional health (10%). Only a minority addressed health determinants including health service factors (8%), health behaviours (6%) and broader structural and socio-economic factors, including the economic and working environment as well as legislative frameworks and other social determinants of health (7%). (Additional file 17).

Most studies were conducted in Spain (65%), followed by Sweden (13%) and Italy (8%), with some additional papers conducted in other European countries, including Switzerland (3%), the United Kingdom (2%), The Netherlands (1%), Norway (1%), France (1%) and Finland (1%). Studies conducted in countries other than Spain focused mostly on non-communicable diseases, accounting for more than 50% of the studies in this area. Conversely, amongst the studies addressing communicable infections, less than 1/4 were conducted out of Spain (Additional file 18).

The majority of studies consisted of quantitative cross-sectional descriptions and/or analyses, and were conducted after 2008. Only 10 employed qualitative tools (5%) and four adopted a mixed-methods approach (2%). Qualitative research addressed health care services, occupational factors and emotional health, but was almost non-existent in the literature addressing communicable and non-communicable conditions. Only three studies collected data at both country of origin (CO) and destination, truly incorporating a transnational dimension.

Most studies compared specific health indicators of HAs with those of the locally born populations. The “HA population” was often grouped as an analytical category and only a minority of studies focused on nationals from a single country. The country of origin of study participants - sometimes not indicated in the description of the sample - was often not considered in the interpretation of results.

Health status

Communicable infections

Of all the studies reviewed 74 (38%) addressed one or more communicable infections. Of these, 29 focused on HIV (Additional file 4), 11 on other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (Additional file 5), and 14 on Tuberculosis (TB) (Additional file 6). An additional 20 studies focused on other communicable diseases (Additional file 7). With the exception of research focused on a range of “imported diseases” and studies on STIs and TB where the interlinks with HIV were often made explicit, most studies addressed a single specific disease, with limited accounts of the concurrence of different pathologies and how these intersect with individuals’ quality of life.

Studies in Britain [17], Italy [18] and Spain [19] reported higher HIV prevalence rates in homosexual and to a lesser extent heterosexual HA men vs locals, with rates going from 4.5% in heterosexual HA men in Spain [19] to 78% in men who have sex with men (MSM) who injected drugs and attended STI clinics in Italy [20]. In Spain, the most common area of origin of reported HIV cases in the foreign born was HA [21] and the proportion of HIV cases of HA origin increased from 17% to 22% between 2000 and 2007 [22]. A quarter of HIV+ HAs attended at a tropical medicine unit in Spain had not started treatment when indicated [23].

Amongst sex workers, HIV rates differed markedly by sex. A 0.2% prevalence was found in HA female sex workers in Spain [24] while amongst transsexual women HIV rates were above 16% in both Italy and Spain [25-28]. The HIV prevalence in HA male sex workers in Spain (16%) was well above the rates in locals (9%) [29].

Misconceptions about HIV were common amongst HAs in Spain [30,31], where HA MSM reported unprotected anal sex more frequently than local MSM [32]. In the Netherlands, sex workers who originated from HA used condoms less consistently than those originating from other countries and the locally born [33].

A study conducted in England and Wales, reported that 39% of the HIV+ cases identified in persons born in South/Central America had probably acquired the infection in the UK [34]. Similarly, many of the HIV infections in HAs living in Spain appeared to have been locally acquired [35] with the highest percentages of recent infection reported in this population (28%) as compared to locals (23%) and persons from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (12%) [36]. In the European Union (EU), the percentage of Latin-Americans amongst AIDS reports in MSM is increasing [37].

This review also identified some encouraging findings: no differences in response to HIV treatment were found in HAs vs locals [38] nor signs of increased transmission of drug resistant HIV [39] and the number of HIV diagnoses in HA children were reported to decrease [40,41]. In Britain, self-reported HIV test uptake reached 90% in MSM born in South/Central America [17] and in Spain, fear of discrimination was not reported to be a major barrier to HIV testing at mobile units [42].

An additional 11 studies focused on other STIs, including the human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) [43-47], human papilloma virus (HPV) [48-50], syphilis [51], chlamydia [52] and Karposi sarcoma [53]. In Switzerland and Spain, HAs were disproportionally affected by syphilis [51,54]. The prevalence of chlamydia was three times higher in a sample of undocumented migrants (78% originating from Latin-America) who presented at a Swiss hospital to undergo voluntary termination of pregnancy vs a control sample of pregnant women with legal residency permit who attended the same hospital during the same time period [52]. The higher prevalence of HTLV-1/2 in HA females vs locals [46] and other migrant groups [44,45] prompted suggestions for HTLV antenatal screening in HA pregnant women in Spain [44,45]. Similarly, the high prevalence of HPV infection (21%-62%) [48-50] and increased risk of cervical cancer [55,56] led researchers to highlight the importance of promoting cervical cancer screening in this population [55-57].

We identified 14 studies focused on TB [58-71]. Several studies found high percentages of HAs amongst TB cases diagnosed in migrants [58-63], ranging from 43-44% in migrant children in Spain and Italy [58,61] to 68% in undocumented migrants in Switzerland [62]. In Italy and Switzerland HAs were at higher risk of TB than migrants from other areas [65,66]. In Spain, HAs were more likely to develop TB as an AIDS defining disease than locals [67] and HA inmates were at higher risk of latent TB than Spanish-born prisoners [68].

Only 2.8% of foreign-born TB cases were ill on arrival to Spain but half developed the disease within the following 2 years [59,60]. Although this was often attributed to reactivation of latent infection [60,66] transmission between local and foreign-born communities made an important contribution to the burden of TB [63]. The bidirectional transmission operating between communities was partially attributed to cultural and linguistic “similarities” that enhanced social interaction between HAs and the locally-born [60,63]. The high mobility of this population- including cases of deportation in undocumented migrants- could impede TB treatment compliance [62] although one study found that HAs adhered to treatment better than locals (82% vs 76%) [70]. In consistency with studies conducted with other migrant groups [72], misconceptions about TB transmission routes prevailed [71].

An additional 20 studies focused on other communicable diseases. These mainly described the prevalence of cysticercosis [73-75], hepatitis A, B, C and G [76-80], malaria [81], toxoplasma gondii [82,83], intestinal parasitosis, visceral toxocarlasis [84,85], rubella [86,87], varicella [88], and other infectious/parasitic diseases [84,85,89,90]. These studies often drew screening [78-80,87,88] and vaccination recommendations [91,92].

Non-communicable conditions

Less attention has been paid to non-communicable conditions, which accounted for 17% of the articles reviewed. We identified 15 studies that focused on cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and related risk factors (Additional file 8), 13 cancer (Additional file 9), and four on other non-communicable conditions (Additional file 10).

Studies on cancer focused on prevalence rates in migrants vs non-migrants [56,57,93-99], uptake of gynaecological screening [55,100,101] and psychosocial vulnerabilities in affected children [102]. Prevalence of cancer in HAs vs locals varied depending on the type of cancer [98]. HAs were at increased risk of gallbladder [94], testicular [93,98], stomach [98] and papillary thyroid cancer (females) [96], but at lower risk of nervous system [93,97,98], breast [95], ovarian [99], colon cancer [98], and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [98]. Risks of cervical cancer increased in HA women aged > 50 [56] and Central Americans [55]. Some studies suggest that genetic and childhood environmental risk factors might explain differences in nervous system, breast, gallbladder and thyroid cancer rates better than exposures after migration [94-97]. Other factors could also influence some types of cancers as illustrated by the lower mammogram uptake reported in HAs vs locally born females [100,101].

CVD risks were reported to be lower in HAs vs locals in one study [103] but could increase over the years [104]. Important heterogeneities were identified: South Americans in Spain had a reduced risk of mortality from ischemic heart disease [105] but persons originating from Central America and the Caribbean showed the highest mortality rates due to cerebro-vascular pathologies [105-107]. In Sweden, the risk of stroke in Chileans and locals was similar [108].

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in HAs was below the level identified in locals and other migrants in a study conducted in a Spanish primary care centre [109]. However, the prevalence of risk factors underlying metabolic conditions linked to diabetes such as obesity, overweight and high body mass index (BMI) was consistently above the level found in autochthonous populations [110-113]. Obesity rates reached 17% in HA males living in Spain [110] and in Sweden the difference in BMI persisted after adjusting for age, educational status, physical activity and smoking [113]. The prevalence of overweight in adopted children of HA origin living in Sweden was particularly high in Chileans (28.6%) as compared with locals (14%), leading researchers to suggest that genetic factors could play a major role in the development of this condition [112]. The role of genetic vs environmental exposures was seen as less clear in the case of DM [114]. In one study conducted in Sweden, adoptees and second generation migrants originating from HA had a lower risk for DM than locals [115]. In another study, also conducted in Sweden, the low risk for DM persisted in adoptees from low prevalence South American countries, but increased in children born in Sweden whose parents originated from South America. These findings point to exposures in utero or early childhood as relevant factors to be considered [116].

While non communicable conditions such as osteoarthritis and skin problems tended to be less prevalent amongst HAs there were some exceptions such as headaches, migraines, anaemia, low back pain and constipation [117]. The three studies focused on allergies found that the HA population was disproportionally affected by allergies/asthma [118-120] with symptoms appearing mostly after arrival in Europe [119].

Emotional and psychological health

We identified 20 studies (10%) that focused on “emotional and psychological health” (Additional file 11). The presence of vulnerability factors in the HA population living in Europe is well described in the literature and includes exposure to traumatic experiences of violence at the countries of origin [121] as well as post-migration stressors including adaptation to a new context [122-125], cultural barriers [126], economic difficulties [121], inability to meet pre-migration expectations [127], occupational worries [128], poor sense of control [121], break-up of social and family ties, feelings of loss, novelty and nostalgia, undocumented residence status [122], and lack of a consolidated community [129]. In Italy, higher rates of “somatisation” were described amongst HAs [130,131]. However, evidence on the actual prevalence of psychological disorders in this population is inconclusive with studies reporting higher [129,132,133], similar [134], and lower rates [135] vs local populations. Differing patterns have also been found when disaggregating the analysis by sex [136] and country of birth [137], including reports of wide disparities in antidepressant consumption [138].

Some studies question the widespread concept of migration as a “risk factor” for poor mental health and suggest that general socio-economic stressors- as opposed to stressors specific to the migration process- could have the greatest impact on mental distress in the HA population. A study in Barcelona found for example that “homesickness” and perceived discrimination were not associated to psychopathology [127] and in Sweden, economic difficulties were stronger risk factors for psychological distress than pre-migration exposure to violence [121]. We identified inconsistencies regarding the role played by perceived discrimination on HA’s health with studies finding both strong [139-141] and no association [134] with mental health indicators.

The use of coping strategies to manage stress was seldom investigated. Religiosity was reported to be high and negatively related to stress in both sexes [142]. Logical analysis, reappraisal, seeking guidance and problem-solving were strategies more widely used than negative coping modalities such as cognitive avoidance, acceptance-resignation, seeking alternative rewards and emotional discharge [128]. However, somatisation, anxiety, hostility and obsessive-compulsive disorders were reported to increase with length of stay, as did the use of avoidance coping strategies [128]. In a study conducted in Spain, social integration in the community positively correlated with subjective well being [123]. However, other studies conducted in Spain found that participation in a community group was positively related to poor mental health [139] and that Ecuadorians from high ethnic density neighbourhoods were more likely to have mental health problems than those living in areas with low ethnic density [143].

Maternal and child health

A total of 27 studies addressed maternal and child health [144-170] (Additional file 12). The use of caesarean section (CS) was consistently higher in HAs vs locals [146,149-153,160,166] and all the studies that investigated rates of low birth weight (LBW) except for two [151,165] found that these were higher [144,158-161,166] or similar [153] in children born to local women. However, in Finland, newborns to Latin-American mothers had more interventions after birth and higher perinatal mortality [151] and in Sweden, the risk of non-normal birth was 50% higher [163]. In Spain, the risk of some infections [158,164], poor prenatal care [158] and rates of very low birth weight were also higher in children born to HAs mothers when compared with locals [161].

The single study that employed a qualitative approach identified that some HA women in Spain perceived pre-natal controls to offer little benefit [145] although in Sweden, HA women did not use antenatal care either less nor later than recommended [155]. The use of intrapartum epidural analgesia was common [147,150] and mothers were satisfied with its use as a pain reliever [148].

Some researchers pointed to greater use of contraceptive methods in HAs as compared to people from SSA and Asia [168] but there was a strikingly high variability in reported use by country of origin, ranging from 100% in Colombians to 55% in Dominicans [169]. A study with undocumented Latin-American women in Geneva found that four out of five pregnancies resulting in live births were unintended [170].

Health services

We reviewed 15 studies focused on patterns of service use [171-178], reasons for consultation [179,180], barriers and facilitators to access [181], users’ perceptions over the quality of services [182,183], health providers’ views [184], and the degree of implementation of clinical protocols [185] (Additional file 13).

A study on causes of hospitalization conducted in Spain found that most cases in HAs fell in the “pregnancy and childbirth” category (44%), followed by digestive problems (11%) and trauma (7%). Infectious diseases accounted for 3.2% cases and were the 6th most common cause of admission [179]. Amongst undocumented migrants, primary consultations other than gynaecological and paediatric services were mostly due to acute respiratory infections, depressive disorders, headache, back pain, and hypertension [180].

Access to health services was perceived to be generally easy once a personal health-care card had been obtained. Still, fears of asking for time off at work and mistrust in health providers were found to deter some persons from seeking care in Spain [181]. The perceived quality of services compared favourably to those received at the countries of origin and gratuity was appreciated [178,183]. However, middle-aged Chilean women who had lived in Sweden for 15–20 years highlighted the importance of improving providers’ communication skills in a context of persisting power imbalances between health providers and users [182]. Spanish providers perceived that HAs presented “fewer difficulties” than other immigrants [184] and better compliance with paediatric visits [185].

The use of dermatology [175,176], dental [177] and other specialist services [172] was lower in HAs vs locals and an economic analysis found that the health “expenditure” generated by this population was below the local average [174]. Findings regarding the use of emergency services in Spain show some inconsistent results with reports of HA men resorting to emergency services more [172] and less [174] frequently than locals. Still, qualitative inquiries suggest that emergency services are preferred for practical reasons [183] and may be used for non-urgent conditions by HAs who are not entitled to see a family physician [178].

Social, economic and occupational factors

Only 7% of the studies reviewed focused on social, economic and occupational factors [137,186-198] (Additional file 14).

In Spain, having a monthly income above €1,000 was associated with better self-reported health [193] although one study found that measures of subjective social status predicted heath status better than socio-economic indicators [194]. In Sweden, studies conducted with refugees examined the relationship between migration and self-reported health [195] after adjusting for social class and low material standards. The authors concluded that “being an immigrant” was a risk factor for ill health as important as lifestyle factors [195], and that ethnicity was an independent powerful determinant of self-rated health [196]. In Spain, discrimination emerged as a key factor triggering violence in the HA population [189] and perceived insecurity affected social integration negatively [191]. Studies on self-reported health by sex showed inconclusive results: HA men had better outcomes than HA females in two studies [192,193] but Bolivian men scored the lowest in another [137].

A qualitative exploration with Colombians in Barcelona found that participants were poorly informed about how to prevent labour-related risk hazards [186]. In the UK, a transnational study found that the use of home remedies for minor ailments persisted after migration. Social interactions led to the incorporation of other herbs commonly used by migrants originating from other countries [188]. Reported self-medication with anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and antibiotics was high (77%) [198].

Health behaviours

A total of 11 studies (6%) focused on health behaviours. These addressed mostly dietary habits [199-202] and substance use patterns [203-209] (Additional file 15).

Major dietary changes occurred frequently after migration, including decreased consumption of fruits and soups [200,201] and increased use of processed products [200]. The impact of migration on eating practices was influenced by distance from country of origin, legal status allowing more or less return visits at home, price and availability of local foods, strength of social networks [199], level of ethnic identity [202], and busy work schedules restricting time available to cook [201].

An increased consumption of alcohol after migration was reported often in a study conducted in Spain [206] and about 40% of HA respondents declared that they consumed alcohol frequently [203,209]. Around 25%-30% HAs reported smoking, along the lines of consumption levels in Latin-America and Spain [204,206]. Illicit drugs were perceived as “dangerous” by HA youth [209] who also reported lower use than locals [207]. Reported prevalence of illegal substance use was 5%-6% [203,204], with men in the 25–39 age group being the most frequent users and cocaine the substance most commonly used [208].

Discussion

This scoping review synthesises existing knowledge about the heath status and determinants of HAs in Europe in order to inform a research agenda. The 193 studies reviewed focused mostly on the health status of this population and paid disproportionately little attention to the determinants of health. The majority of studies addressed communicable infections, followed by “maternal and child health” and a range of “psycho-pathologies”. Burgeoning research in the last few years has yielded some specific, consistent findings about the health status and determinants of HAs in Europe (Table 2). These suggest that this population has a tendency to overweight, is prone to deliver babies using Caesarean sections, is more likely to have post-birth complications than locals, is prone to be affected by allergies/asthma, utilises specialised services less than locals, and carries a disproportionate burden of communicable infections in specific sub-populations. However there are many inconsistent findings and some popular perceptions about “Hispano-American migrants” are not fully confirmed by the evidence reviewed (Table 3). Most studies adopted a vertical approach focusing on a particular disease but left unexplored the interlinkages between different pathologies and health conditions and how these relate to occupational, legislative, social and environmental factors. Many considered “HA migrants” as a homogeneous analytical category masking likely heterogeneities. This review describes these important research gaps and suggests specific avenues of inquiry to advance knowledge in this field.

Table 2

Findings specific to the HA migrant population in Europe that were consistently identified in the literature

Results consistently found	Evidence
HIV prevalence in MSM and transgender women of HA origin >16%	17,18,19,20,25,26,27,28
Frequent post-migration acquisition of HIV and TB in HA migrants	34,35,36,60,63
HAs amongst TB cases in migrants > 40%	58,59,60,61,62,63
Prevalence of specific STIs in HA migrants > locals	46,48,50
Prevalence of other communicable diseases (Malaria, Toxoplasmosis, Neurocysticercosis etc.) in HA migrants > locals / high % of HAs amongst total cases diagnosed	73,74,75,81,82,83,90
Prevalence of obesity/overweight/high BMI > locals	110,111,112,113
Prevalence of allergies in HA migrants > locals/other migrant groups	118,119,120
Caesarean Section in HAs > locals	146,149,150,151,152,153,160,166
Some adverse peri-natal outcomes in HAs > locals	151,158,161,163
Use of specialised health services in HAs < locals	172,175,176,177,

Table 3

Popular beliefs not fully supported by the available evidence

Popular assumptions	Study results	Comments
HA migrants are more prone to psychological disorders than locals	YES:129,132,133	Studies report higher [129,132,133], similar [134] and lower rates [135]. Differing patterns when disaggregating the analysis by sex [136] and country of birth [137]
	NO:134,135
	Depends on sex and nationality:136,137
Communicable infections are the main health problem affecting HA migrants	NO:179,180	Most causes of hospitalization fell in the “Pregnancy and Childbirth” category (44%), followed by digestive problems (11%) and trauma (7%). Infectious diseases accounted for 3.2% cases [179]. Main causes of consultations in undocumented migrants: gynaecological and paediatric, acute respiratory infections, depressive disorders, headache, lower back pain and hypertension [180]
HIV and TB are mainly “imported” from countries of origin	NO:34,35,36,60,63	Many HIV cases seem locally acquired [34-36].
		Only 2.8% of foreign-born TB cases ill on arrival but 50% develop disease in 2 years [60]. Reactivation of latent infection [60] but also transmission between local and foreign-born [63]
HAs overuse health services causing operational and financial burdens	Wide heterogeneities: 171,172,174,217	Health “expenditure” HAs < locals [174]. Studies report that HA men resort to emergency services more [172] and less [174] than locals. Wide heterogeneities depending on demographics, health status, area of residence, country of origin and type of service [171,172,174,217]
Strong social networks correlate with better health indicators in HA migrants	YES:123	Social integration in the community positively correlates with subjective well being [123]. Social integration through community group positively related to poor mental health [139]. Ecuadorians from high ethnic density areas more likely to be a possible psychiatric case vs those living in low ethnic density neighbourhoods [143]
	NO:139,143
Women are the more disadvantaged in terms of poor health	YES:192,193	Heterogeneous results on self-perceived health by sex: men had better outcomes in two studies [192,193] but Bolivian men scored lowest in another [137]
	NOT ALWAYS:137

It is now widely accepted that the conditions in which people are born, grow, live and work are crucial determinants of populations’ health [210] and amongst “ethnicity and health” scholars there is a high level of consensus on the need to move beyond an exclusive focus on behavioural and genetic determinants to account for broader contextual factors [211]. Still, this review illustrates that the greatest share of scientific production on the health of HAs in Europe is focused on the health status of this population and pays disproportionately little attention to the social, occupational and economic determinants of health. Research efforts have focused on communicable infections although these contribute only partially to the burden of disease in a population that is more commonly affected by gynaecological and obstetric conditions, traumatic accidents, headaches, back pain, depression and gastrointestinal disorders [179,180] (Table 3). This is in line with the wider body of literature addressing migrants’ and ethnic minorities’ health, where these tend to be portrayed as “sources of infection” in spite of being more commonly affected by similar diseases as locals [212,213].

A comprehensive understanding of HAs’ health requires a closer look at various layers of social determinants of health (SDH). We need to understand better the pathways through which the living and working conditions of HA populations in Europe influence their health status and behaviours. Beyond basic demographic characteristics and income indicators we need to account for neighbourhood characteristics such as ethnic density and social cohesion indicators, and consider legal status, religion, social class, employment status, working conditions and ethnicity as cross-cutting axis linking “migrant status” to health outcomes. The specificities of diverse HA populations should be examined, and greater policy attention paid to the “invisibility” of domestic and personal care work - commonly performed by HAs in Europe- and the “unseen” hazards related to it [214]. A careful evaluation of the achievements and pitfalls of policies designed to regularise domestic work, such as the voucher system in Belgium and France [215] and the recent failed attempt in Spain [216] could shed light into what should be done to address this issue.

The literature on migrants’ health reports wide heterogeneities in patterns of health service utilisation, depending on demographic factors, area of residence, country of origin and type of service [171,172,174,217-220]. In the case of HAs, the popular perception that they resort to health care services more often than locals- which is sometimes attributed to their “low tolerance to pain” [221]- is not fully confirmed by the existing evidence (Table 3). A more careful examination that accounts for a variety of demographic and socio-economic factors is needed to unpack the complex patterns and determinants of service use in diverse HA populations.

Cancer risks varied by area of origin and cancer typology [98]. We also identified substantial heterogeneities in cardiovascular mortality [105,107], morbidity [108] and risk factors [104,222]. Our findings mirror the inconsistent picture found for other migrant groups and support recent calls to develop “fine-grained monitoring systems” that account for different populations and health conditions [212]. Future research should investigate how rates of CVD in HAs in Europe compare to those of locally-born residents, HAs who never migrated, those residing in different European countries [223], and “second generation” migrants [103]. However, there are many methodological challenges to be faced, particularly in relation to the availability of ethnicity indicators and reliable comparable data [224].

Our findings do not support the popular belief that HAs exhibit higher rates of psychopathology than the locally born. The inconclusiveness of results in this field - with studies finding levels of psychopathology that are both above and below the rates found in locals- casts doubts on the widespread assumption that migration “per se” is a risk factor of mental disorders (Table 3). Along the same lines, previous reviews on the prevalence of mental illness in migrant populations have also found wide disparities [225]. While the vulnerabilities faced by HA migrants in Europe are well described in the literature, we don’t know enough about how these translate into prevalence of psycho-pathology and the specific factors that trigger or hinder the development of mental disorders. Beyond dissecting the relative influence of stressors directly related with the migration process from other more general strains that also affect the local populations, we need to examine the interlinks between different sources of stress including perceived discrimination, legal status, and interpersonal violence, and how these intersect with other factors such as sex, age, income, occupational status, reasons to migrate, sexual orientation, class and ethnicity [226-228].

In a context of rapidly changing population flows exacerbated by the economic recession, it becomes crucial to longitudinally explore patterns and determinants of health in HAs who initially settled in Spain but who decided to re-emigrate back home or moved to other European countries where the “cultural congruity” that has been described and questioned [134,229] as a “protective factor” in Spain, may not operate. Attention should also be paid to HAs who decide to stay in contexts of high unemployment and job insecurity - firmly established determinants of poor mental health [230-240]. Against the unstable macro-economic backdrop of many European countries, the role played by discrimination as a social determinant of health, and how it interlinks with broader societal attitudes including racism and class prejudices merits additional attention. Further research on the role of social support will help us to interpret the unexpected positive correlations found between poor mental health and indicators of “social integration” [139,143], contributing to current debates over the influence of neighbourhood characteristics on health indicators [241,242].

In spite of unfavourable economic and social contexts, this review has found some promising prospects related to the effective mobilisation of coping strategies in this population [128,142]. The potential benefits (and limitations) of self-esteem and self-efficacy as health-protective factors [243-245] should be further examined and empirical data collected to inform the vulnerability-resilience debate [246].

The inconclusiveness of results in the field of mental health could be partly explained by the difficulty of diagnosing psychiatric disorders in populations of diverse cultural backgrounds with possible differing conceptualisations of mental health and ways to communicate distress [247]. Future studies should consider how psychopathology is defined at the countries of origin [247,248] and investigate further the cultural sensitivity of diagnostic instruments used [225].

Additional research is needed to monitor patterns of substance use and its determinants. We also need to understand better how maternal and child health indicators and determinants vary along the migration experience. The birth weight advantage of children born to HA mother identified in several studies [159,160,166] has led researchers to suggest that a “healthy migrant effect” or selected migration of healthier individuals might operate [159]. We consistently identified poor indicators for other birth outcomes [158,161,163,164] including perinatal mortality [151], which underscores the need to further investigate the nature, extent and duration of the “healthy migrant effect” [249] as well as perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing/providing good quality antenatal care from both users’ and providers’ perspectives. The extremely high rates of unwanted pregnancies [170] reported in the mid 2000s amongst undocumented HA migrants calls for additional up-to-date research in this field.

The majority of studies identified through our search strategy focused on communicable infections with a marked predominance of research focused on Chagas disease. This is not surprising given the particularly high prevalence of this disease amongst HAs, specially Bolivians [5], and the fact that public health policies known to be effective to prevent infection through blood transfusions and from mother-to-child are yet to be adopted by most European countries [250]. Other infectious diseases such as TB and STIs have received less research attention but the available evidence consistently points to a high proportion of HAs amongst TB cases identified in migrants (>40%), with frequent post-migration infection (Table 3). Besides considering how the conditions of migration influence reactivation of latent TB, the extent and mechanisms through which recent, post-migration TB infection occurs within host countries, and how these relate to social networking patterns with the autonomous populations and other migrant groups will further understanding of the nature and extent of the bidirectional transmission patterns reported in the literature [60,63]. Particular focus should also be placed on MSM and transsexual females of HA origin, consistently found to bear a disproportionate burden of HIV. Epidemiological, cost-effectiveness and qualitative studies are needed to assess the value of screening migrants for STIs and other communicable infections. These studies should be framed within broader ethical debates and should consider the fundamental principles of ethnic health research to ensure that besides addressing a public health concern, the evidence generated does actually revert into better health-care experiences and outcomes for minority populations [211].

Most of the studies reviewed adopted a cross-sectional approach based on data collected at a single receiving country with only 3 studies collecting data both at sending and reception countries. The paucity of trans-national and longitudinal studies is partly due to methodological challenges. Further research efforts, coupled with adequate funding should be directed to address these so both pre-migration and post-migration influences can be properly accounted for [251]. Differing reasons for migration should be considered as potential determinants of health and due attention should be paid to the health of migrants who return to their country of origin after a “failed” migration experience.

Amongst the studies that disaggregated data by sex, many found diverging results for women and men, suggesting that sex and gender should be further examined as factors influencing health outcomes in this population. Besides advancing knowledge on the often overlapping vulnerabilities that affect many migrant women, the finding that Bolivian men had some poorer health outcomes than their female counterparts [137] underscores the need to also investigate the reasons behind the health disadvantage described in some HA men. Changes in gender roles and relations resulting from migration processes- and its implications for health- deserve additional research. Moving yet one step further, a broad spectrum of gender identities including those of transgender females should be considered. By accounting for a plurality of “masculinities” and “feminities” future research should contribute to disentangle the often neglected interlink between sex and gender, and how these two variables intersect with other factors, including socioeconomic status and ethnicity, to influence health.

Hispano-Americans share a common language, but they can’t be categorised as a homogeneous “ethnic group”. The wide spectrum of ethnicities across HA populations, very often mixed, is just the most visible of an array of heterogeneities that characterises a population with differing reasons to migrate as well as educational, occupational, and social class backgrounds. Still, many of the studies reviewed grouped together “Latin-Americans” as an analytical category neglecting within-group differences. The diversity of results in the remarkable cases where data was disaggregated by country of origin and sex indicates that more refined analysis are needed so the commonalities and differences vs locals, other migrant populations, and within the HA migrant population itself can be better described and understood. To counter the “colour-blind” approach [252] prevailing in the literature, due attention should be paid to “whiteness” [242] and how ethnicity intertwines with migrant and socio-economic status to potentially influence health inequities. The ethnic diversity of the HA population in Europe provides a good opportunity to advance towards a more nuanced understanding of the interlinks between ethnicity, income, migrant status, and social status as determinants of health.

It has been argued that ethnicity and migration have been neglected in the “Social Determinants of Health” agenda [252]. This review illustrates the disproportionately little attention that the social determinants have received in European research addressing Hispano-Americans’ health. We call for continued increasing attention to this field of research, and make specific suggestions on how to readdress the balance. Conceptual models that go beyond categorizing individuals by broad regions of origin and that account for different potential sources of inequities [242,253] should underpin future studies in this field, so over-simplifications and over-generalisations likely to reinforce stigmatising clichés are avoided [252] and the interest of minority groups are better served by health research [211].

Limitations

The variability of study populations, sampling methods, recruitment strategies and outcome measures used constitute intrinsic limitations of this review. We had to balance the sensitivity vs specificity of our search strategy to make the task feasible while at the same time giving an accurate account of the state of the art. We are aware that we might have missed relevant papers and in particular studies on “migrants’ health” that did not include in their abstracts findings that were specific to HAs. However, many of these studies considered “the migrant population” as a homogeneous category or disaggregated their origin in broad terms (E.g.: Latin-American and the Caribbean) tending to mask - rather than shed light- into likely heterogeneities across migrant groups. To minimise potential publication bias we searched the regional database LILACS. We acknowledge that many of the studies that address the health of HAs in Europe are “grey literature” reports that are not published in scientific journals. While not feasible to include these in our review, due attention was paid to relevant documents, which informed our discussion. In spite of the limitations described, we are confident that this review accurately scopes the current state of knowledge on the health status and determinants of HAs in Europe and will be crucial to inform the research agenda on this matter.

Conclusions

Burgeoning research addressing the health of HAs in Europe has produced some solid findings but there are huge gaps in knowledge and several prevailing beliefs are not fully supported by empirical evidence. Most studies adopted a vertical approach focusing on a particular disease but left unexplored the interlinkages between different pathologies and health conditions and how these relate to the broad determinants of health. Many considered “HA migrants” as a homogeneous analytical category masking likely heterogeneities. To prevent unhelpful generalisations and stereotyping simplifications we need a more holistic and nuanced understanding of how mobility, ethnicity, income, legislative status, employment status, working conditions, neighbourhood characteristics, gender relations and social status intersect with demographic variables and policy contexts to influence the health of the diverse HA populations present in Europe.