Literature DB >> 25947571

One-size MAP does not fit all.

Mourad H Senussi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25947571      PMCID: PMC4423105          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0939-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

One-size mean arterial pressure does not fit all

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1] advocates maintaining a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of at least 65 mm Hg in sepsis patients undergoing resuscitation. Leone and colleagues [2], in an article published in this journal, suggest considering higher MAP targets in the resuscitation of patients with a history of arterial hypertension so they do not progress to acute kidney injury. Asfar and colleagues [3], in a multicenter, open-label trial, showed no significant difference in mortality outcomes in septic shock patients undergoing resuscitation with an MAP target of either 80 to 85 mm Hg (high-target group) or 65 to 70 mm Hg (low-target group). However, the study did show that chronic hypertensive patients in the higher-target group had lower incidences of acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy. This likely stems from the need for higher MAPs in chronic hypertensive patients in order to maintain organ blood flow because of a shift of the organ’s autoregulatory range to the right. Thus, targeting a higher MAP for chronic hypertensive patients may help avoid the development of acute kidney injury and the need for renal replacement therapy. Renal replacement therapy carries with it inherent morbidity as well as additional cost. These costs include the need for dialysate fluid and extra personnel and the use of anticoagulation and the extracorporeal circuit [2]. However, chronic hypertensive patients in the high-target group had a greater incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (5.2% in the low-target group versus 9% in the high-target group). Patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation during sepsis have been shown to have increased incidences of in-hospital stroke and in-hospital mortality [4] as well as subsequent recurrence of atrial fibrillation and increased long-term risks for heart failure, ischemic stroke, and death [5]. This may offset any benefit of a higher MAP. The ideal target MAP may have to be individualized for specific patient populations. More studies are needed to determine whether baseline blood pressure plays a role in the ultimate determination of the ideal MAP target for patients with sepsis.
  5 in total

1.  High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Pierre Asfar; Ferhat Meziani; Jean-François Hamel; Fabien Grelon; Bruno Megarbane; Nadia Anguel; Jean-Paul Mira; Pierre-François Dequin; Soizic Gergaud; Nicolas Weiss; François Legay; Yves Le Tulzo; Marie Conrad; René Robert; Frédéric Gonzalez; Christophe Guitton; Fabienne Tamion; Jean-Marie Tonnelier; Pierre Guezennec; Thierry Van Der Linden; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Eric Mariotte; Gaël Pradel; Olivier Lesieur; Jean-Damien Ricard; Fabien Hervé; Damien du Cheyron; Claude Guerin; Alain Mercat; Jean-Louis Teboul; Peter Radermacher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Incident stroke and mortality associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Joanna M Ghobrial; Lesley H Curtis; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven A Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Long-term outcomes following development of new-onset atrial fibrillation during sepsis.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Bradley G Hammill; Lesley H Curtis; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Optimizing mean arterial pressure in septic shock: a critical reappraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Marc Leone; Pierre Asfar; Peter Radermacher; Jean-Louis Vincent; Claude Martin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Postoperative blood pressure deficit and acute kidney injury progression in vasopressor-dependent cardiovascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Shinjiro Saito; Shigehiko Uchino; Masanori Takinami; Shoichi Uezono; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 9.097

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.