Literature DB >> 25947313

Particulate matter components, sources, and health: Systematic approaches to testing effects.

Kate Adams1, Daniel S Greenbaum, Rashid Shaikh, Annemoon M van Erp, Armistead G Russell.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Exposure to particulate matter (PM) is associated with adverse health outcomes. There has long been a question as to whether some components of the PM mixture are of greater public health concern than others so that the sources that emit the more toxic components could be controlled. In this paper, we describe the National Particle Component Toxicity (NPACT) initiative, a comprehensive research program that combined epidemiologic and toxicologic approaches to evaluate this critical question, partly relying on information from a national network of air quality monitors that provided data on speciated PM2.5 (PM with an aerodynamic diameter<2.5 μm) starting in 2000. We also consider the results of the NPACT program in the context of selected research on PM components and health in order to assess the current state of the field. Overall, the ambitious NPACT research program found associations of secondary sulfate and, to a somewhat lesser extent, traffic sources with health effects. Although this and other research has linked a variety of health effects to multiple groups of PM components and sources of PM, the collective evidence has not yet isolated factors or sources that would be closely and unequivocally more strongly related to specific health outcomes. If greater success is to be achieved in isolating the effects of pollutants from mobile and other major sources, either as individual components or as a mixture, more advanced approaches and additional measurements will be needed so that exposure at the individual or population level can be assessed more accurately. Enhanced understanding of exposure and health effects is needed before it can be concluded that regulations targeting specific sources or components of PM2.5 will protect public health more effectively than continuing to follow the current practices of targeting PM2.5 mass as a whole. IMPLICATIONS: This paper describes a comprehensive epidemiologic and toxicologic research program to evaluate whether some components and sources of PM may be more toxic than others. This question is important for regulatory agencies in setting air quality standards to protect people's health. The results show that PM from coal and oil combustion and from traffic sources was associated with adverse health outcomes, but other components and sources could not definitively be ruled out. Thus, given current knowledge, the current practice of setting air quality standards for PM mass as a whole likely remains an effective approach to protecting public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25947313     DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.1001884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  41 in total

Review 1.  DNA-protein crosslinks from environmental exposure: Mechanisms of formation and repair.

Authors:  Yusuke Kojima; Yuichi J Machida
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Air pollution exposure is associated with the gut microbiome as revealed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing.

Authors:  Farnaz Fouladi; Maximilian J Bailey; William B Patterson; Michael Sioda; Ivory C Blakley; Anthony A Fodor; Roshonda B Jones; Zhanghua Chen; Jeniffer S Kim; Frederick Lurmann; Cameron Martino; Rob Knight; Frank D Gilliland; Tanya L Alderete
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  A community-engaged approach to investigate cardiovascular-associated inflammation among American Indian women: A research protocol.

Authors:  Jada L Brooks; Diane C Berry; Emily G Currin; Alasia Ledford; George J Knafl; Barbara L Fredrickson; Linda S Beeber; David B Peden; Giselle M Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Exposure to air pollutants and the gut microbiota: a potential link between exposure, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Maximillian J Bailey; Noopur N Naik; Laura E Wild; William B Patterson; Tanya L Alderete
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2020-04-29

5.  Excitation Emission Matrix Fluorescence Spectroscopy for Combustion Generated Particulate Matter Source Identification.

Authors:  Jay W Rutherford; Neal Dawson-Elli; Anne M Manicone; Gregory V Korshin; Igor V Novosselov; Edmund Seto; Jonathan D Posner
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Is breast cancer a result of epigenetic responses to traffic-related air pollution? A review of the latest evidence.

Authors:  Debashish Sahay; Mary B Terry; Rachel Miller
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.778

7.  The joint effect of ambient air pollution and agricultural pesticide exposures on lung function among children with asthma.

Authors:  Wande Benka-Coker; Lauren Hoskovec; Rachel Severson; John Balmes; Ander Wilson; Sheryl Magzamen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic investigation reveals metabolic perturbations in PM2.5-treated A549 cells.

Authors:  Dacheng Huang; Yajuan Zou; Anees Abbas; Bona Dai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Air pollution and Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Patrick T Bradshaw; Ghassan B Hamra
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-27

10.  Source-specific contributions of particulate matter to asthma-related pediatric emergency department utilization.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan; Patrick Ryan; Farzan Oroumyeh; Yajna Jathan; Madhumitaa Roy; Siv Balachandran; Cole Brokamp
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2021-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.