Literature DB >> 25946964

Quantitative headspace analysis of selected odorants from latrines in Africa and India.

Charles Jean-François Chappuis, Yvan Niclass, Christine Vuilleumier, Christian Starkenmann.   

Abstract

This analytical investigation focuses on the quantification of odorant molecules in the headspace of latrines. Hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan were derivatized under a more stable N-ethyl maleimide conjugate. Since the amount of odorant molecules is very low in the gas phase, we developed a method that had two steps of concentration. The first step consisted of the accumulation of volatiles in buffered water by bubbling 350 L of air in a bottle. The second step consisted of loading the water on a 1 g solid-phase extraction cartridge, shipping it to our laboratories, and desorbing with Et2O, which achieved a total concentration factor of 3.5 × 10(6). The acidification of the water phase gave us access to the acids, and an additional bottle containing an acidic ion-exchange resin gave us access to trimethyl amine. The limits of quantification in the gas phase were 8.7 × 10(-4) μg/L air for hydrogen sulfide, 1 × 10(-4) μg/L air for methyl mercaptan, 1 × 10(-3) μg/L air for butyric acid, 1 × 10(-4) μg/L air for p-cresol, 1 × 10(-5) μg/L air for indole, and 1 × 10(-5) μg/L air for skatole. The system was calibrated by using olfactometers, which can deliver a precisely known quantity of volatiles into the air. We were able to quantify all compounds near their odor detection thresholds (ODTs). All ODTs were measured in our laboratory with the same olfactometry method. This allowed accurate and comparable ODT values for malodorant compounds from toilets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25946964     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Key Odorants from Pig Production Based on Improved Measurements of Odor Threshold Values Combining Olfactometry and Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry (PTR-MS).

Authors:  Michael Jørgen Hansen; Pernille Lund Kasper; Anders Peter S Adamsen; Anders Feilberg
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors.

Authors:  Siddharth Kawadiya; Claire Welling; Sonia Grego; Marc A Deshusses
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  A three-factor benefits framework for understanding consumer preference for scented household products: psychological interactions and implications for future development.

Authors:  Rachel S Herz; Maria Larsson; Rafael Trujillo; Marisa C Casola; Farah K Ahmed; Stacy Lipe; Morgan E Brashear
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 4.  Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances.

Authors:  Anne Nakagiri; Charles B Niwagaba; Philip M Nyenje; Robinah N Kulabako; John B Tumuhairwe; Frank Kansiime
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Simulating latrine conditions to assess perfume performance against malodour.

Authors:  Charles Jean-François Chappuis; Robin Huber; Yvan Niclass; Christian Starkenmann
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.576

6.  Modification of Major Contributors Responsible for Latrine Malodor on Exposure to Hypochlorous Acid: The Potential for Simultaneously Impacting Odor and Infection Hazards to Encourage Latrine Use.

Authors:  Tim E Dennler-Church; Jeremy C Butz; Joseph E McKinley; Erika K Keim; Mary C Hall; John S Meschke; JoAnne M Mulligan; Jeffrey F Williams; Lori I Robins
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.707

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.