Literature DB >> 25945452

Urban washout: how strong is the rural-background effect?

John C Hogenbirk1, Matthew R McGrail2, Roger Strasser1,3, Sara A Lacarte1, Ajay Kevat4, Michael Lewenberg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test predictors of practice location of fully qualified Monash University Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) graduates.
DESIGN: Cohort survey, 2011.
SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Rural (n = 67/129) and urban (n = 86/191) background doctors starting at Monash University 1992-1999. Approximately 60% female, 77% married/partnered, 79% Australian-born, mean age 34 years, 31% general practitioners, 72% fully qualified and 80% training/practising in major cities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First and current practice location once fully qualified. Intended practice location in 5-10 years.
RESULTS: Logistic regression found that rural versus urban background was a significant predictor of rural (outside major city) first practice location (odds ratio (OR) 5.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-19.2) and rural current practice location (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.5-21.2) for fully qualified doctors. General practitioner versus other medical specialists significantly predicted first (OR 7.2, 95% CI 2.1-25.2) or current (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.1-11.9) rural practice location. Preference for a rural practice location in 5-10 years was predicted by rural background (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.6-11.8) and positive intention towards rural practice upon completing MBBS (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.7-12.6). Surveyed in 2011, 28% of those who also responded to the 2006 survey shifted their preferred future practice location from rural to urban communities versus 13% shifting from urban to rural (McNemar-Bowker test, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: The majority of fully qualified Monash MBBS graduates practicing in rural communities have rural backgrounds. The rural-background effect diminished over time and may need continued support during training and full practice.
© 2015 National Rural Health Alliance Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  doctor; logistic regression; practice intention; practice location

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25945452     DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Rural Health        ISSN: 1038-5282            Impact factor:   1.662


  5 in total

1.  Family Medicine Residencies: How Rural Training Exposure in GME Is Associated With Subsequent Rural Practice.

Authors:  Deborah J Russell; Elizabeth Wilkinson; Stephen Petterson; Candice Chen; Andrew Bazemore
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-08

2.  Practice intentions at entry to and exit from medical schools aspiring to social accountability: findings from the Training for Health Equity Network Graduate Outcome Study.

Authors:  Sarah Larkins; Karen Johnston; John C Hogenbirk; Sara Willems; Salwa Elsanousi; Marykutty Mammen; Kaatje Van Roy; Jehu Iputo; Fortunato L Cristobal; Jennene Greenhill; Charlie Labarda; Andre-Jacques Neusy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 3.  Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities?

Authors:  John Wakerman; John Humphreys; Deborah Russell; Steven Guthridge; Lisa Bourke; Terry Dunbar; Yuejen Zhao; Mark Ramjan; Lorna Murakami-Gold; Michael P Jones
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2019-12-16

Review 4.  Approaches Used to Describe, Measure, and Analyze Place of Practice in Dentistry, Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Rural Graduate Workforce Research in Australia: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Hannah Beks; Sandra Walsh; Laura Alston; Martin Jones; Tony Smith; Darryl Maybery; Keith Sutton; Vincent L Versace
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Gender equity at last: a national study of medical students considering a career in rural medicine.

Authors:  Caleb Kim; Hanh Ngo; Denese Playford
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.