| Literature DB >> 25944327 |
Laurent Pierot1, Colin Derdeyn2.
Abstract
Three recently published trials have conclusively proven the benefit of mechanical endovascular thrombectomy over best medical therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion. These trials shared some features and differed in others. These similarities and differences in trial design and execution affect the conclusions and recommendations that can be made from the data. We will examine the implications of these studies for neurointerventionists, both for current practice and for future studies. In particular, we will focus on procedural details such as patient selection, devices, adjunctive therapies, treatment time windows, and performance metrics.Entities:
Keywords: clinical trial; editorial; stents; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25944327 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stroke ISSN: 0039-2499 Impact factor: 7.914