Literature DB >> 25944295

Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.

Christian T Herbst1, Markus Hess2, Frank Müller2, Jan G Švec3, Johan Sundberg4.   

Abstract

Previous research suggests that independent variation of vocal loudness and glottal configuration (type and degree of vocal fold adduction) does not occur in untrained speech production. This study investigated whether these factors can be varied independently in trained singing and how subglottal pressure is related to average glottal airflow, voice source properties, and sound level under these conditions. A classically trained baritone produced sustained phonations on the endoscopic vowel [i:] at pitch D4 (approximately 294 Hz), exclusively varying either (a) vocal register; (b) phonation type (from "breathy" to "pressed" via cartilaginous adduction); or (c) vocal loudness, while keeping the others constant. Phonation was documented by simultaneous recording of videokymographic, electroglottographic, airflow and voice source data, and by percutaneous measurement of relative subglottal pressure. Register shifts were clearly marked in the electroglottographic wavegram display. Compared with chest register, falsetto was produced with greater pulse amplitude of the glottal flow, H1-H2, mean airflow, and with lower maximum flow declination rate (MFDR), subglottal pressure, and sound pressure. Shifts of phonation type (breathy/flow/neutral/pressed) induced comparable systematic changes. Increase of vocal loudness resulted in increased subglottal pressure, average flow, sound pressure, MFDR, glottal flow pulse amplitude, and H1-H2. When changing either vocal register or phonation type, subglottal pressure and mean airflow showed an inverse relationship, that is, variation of glottal flow resistance. The direct relation between subglottal pressure and airflow when varying only vocal loudness demonstrated independent control of vocal loudness and glottal configuration. Achieving such independent control of phonatory control parameters would be an important target in vocal pedagogy and in voice therapy.
Copyright © 2015 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airflow; Glottal adduction; Singing; Subglottal pressure; Vocal register

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25944295     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  6 in total

1.  Laryngeal strategies to minimize vocal fold contact pressure and their effect on voice production.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vocal Loudness Variation With Spectral Slope.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Anil Palaparthi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Regulation of laryngeal resistance and maximum power transfer with semi-occluded airway vocalization.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Effect of Bhramari Pranayama on the Acoustic and Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice in Normophonic Females.

Authors:  Usha Manjunatha; Jayashree S Bhat; Kumar B Radish; Gagan Bajaj; Poovitha Shruthi; Priyanka Suresh Nayak; Saniya Mariam Rasheeka
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance.

Authors:  Martine Van Puyvelde; Xavier Neyt; Francis McGlone; Nathalie Pattyn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20

6.  Morphometric Differences of Vocal Tract Articulators in Different Loudness Conditions in Singing.

Authors:  Matthias Echternach; Fabian Burk; Michael Burdumy; Louisa Traser; Bernhard Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.