Literature DB >> 25943502

The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer?

P J Andrews1,2, N Choudhury1, A Takhar1, A L Poirrier1, T Jacques1, P S Randhawa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of nasal inspiratory peak flow (NIPF) in providing a clinically accurate objective measure following functional septorhinoplasty by comparing it to the validated disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, SNOT-22. Studies so far have demonstrated poor correlation between bilateral NIPF and symptom-specific nasal questionnaires following septorhinoplasty.
DESIGN: To perform a prospective comparative analysis between NIPF and the validated disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire SNOT-22 and to determine whether a correlation exists following septorhinoplasty surgery.
SETTING: The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 122 patients (78 males, 44 females; mean age 33.5 ± 12.2 years) were recruited from the senior authors rhinology clinic and underwent functional septorhinoplasty surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative nasal inspiratory peak flow (NIPF) measurements were performed in addition to the completion of three subjective quality-of-life and symptom assessment tool questionnaires; Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS: 0-10).
RESULTS: The mean preoperative NIPF was 88.2 L/min, and the postoperative value was 101.6 L/min and showed a significant improvement following surgery (P = 0.0064). The mean total SNOT-22 score improved significantly from 48.6 to 26.6 (P < 0.0001); the NOSE score from 14.1 to 6.6 (P < 0.0001); and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) blockage score from 6.9 to 3.2 (P < 0.0001). All individual domains assessed showed improvements postoperatively, but no correlation was found between the NIPF and SNOT-22 score. Equally, we did not find a correlation between NIPF and the symptom-specific NOSE questionnaire and the nasal blockage domain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that NIPF does not correlate with the SNOT-22 disease-specific questionnaire, although both outcomes significantly improve postoperatively. At present, we are still lacking a clinically accurate objective measure of nasal function for the evaluation of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25943502     DOI: 10.1111/coa.12455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  8 in total

1.  A national survey of functional septorhinoplasty surgery performed in the United Kingdom: a clinician end-user questionnaire to assess current practice and help inform future practice.

Authors:  Samit Unadkat; Alfonso Luca Pendolino; Anil Joshi; Rajiv Bhalla; Timothy Woolford; Alwyn D'Souza; Premjit Randhawa; Hesham Saleh; Peter Andrews
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Effects of Functional Rhinoplasty on Nasal Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rui Zhao; Kai Chen; Yuedi Tang
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 3.  Long-term patient-related outcome measures of septoplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chi Lap Nicholas Tsang; Theresa Nguyen; Torunn Sivesind; Anders Cervin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Unilateral and Bilateral PNIF in Quality Control of Nasal Septal Surgery.

Authors:  Liv Kari Døsen; Knut Kvinnesland; Magnus TarAngen; Olga Shiryaeva; Caryl Gay; Rolf Haye
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-16

5.  In-office treatment of nasal valve obstruction using a novel, bipolar radiofrequency device.

Authors:  Ofer Jacobowitz; Mark Driver; Moshe Ephrat
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-04

6.  The internal nasal valve: a validated grading system and operative guide.

Authors:  B Patel; J S Virk; P S Randhawa; P J Andrews
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Assessment of Rhinoplasty Outcomes with FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module: Norwegian Linguistic Validation and Clinical Application in 243 Patients.

Authors:  Amin Kalaaji; Stine Dreyer; Jakob Schnegg; Lena Sanosyan; Tatjana Radovic; Ivana Maric
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Quality-of-life impact after in-office treatment of nasal valve obstruction with a radiofrequency device: 2-year results from a multicenter, prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Moshe Ephrat; Ofer Jacobowitz; Mark Driver
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 3.858

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.