| Literature DB >> 25943209 |
Mark P Holden1,2, Nora S Newcombe1, Ilyse Resnick1, Thomas F Shipley1.
Abstract
Memory for spatial location is typically biased, with errors trending toward the center of a surrounding region. According to the category adjustment model (CAM), this bias reflects the optimal, Bayesian combination of fine-grained and categorical representations of a location. However, there is disagreement about whether categories are malleable. For instance, can categories be redefined based on expert-level conceptual knowledge? Furthermore, if expert knowledge is used, does it dominate other information sources, or is it used adaptively so as to minimize overall error, as predicted by a Bayesian framework? We address these questions using images of geological interest. The participants were experts in structural geology, organic chemistry, or English literature. Our data indicate that expertise-based categories influence estimates of location memory-particularly when these categories better constrain errors than alternative ("novice") categories. Results are discussed with respect to the CAM.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian models; Categorization; Expertise; Location memory; Spatial cognition
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25943209 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Sci ISSN: 0364-0213