| Literature DB >> 25943073 |
Ranjita Sengupta1,2, Rachel C Anderson1,2, Eric Altermann2,3, Warren C McNabb2,4, Siva Ganesh5, Kelly M Armstrong1, Paul J Moughan2, Nicole C Roy1,2,6.
Abstract
Lactobacillus fermentum is commonly found in food products, and some strains are known to have beneficial effects on human health. However, our previous research indicated that L. fermentum AGR1487 decreases in vitro intestinal barrier integrity. The hypothesis was that cell surface structures of AGR1487 are responsible for the observed in vitro effect. AGR1487 was compared to another human oral L. fermentum strain, AGR1485, which does not cause the same effect. The examination of phenotypic traits associated with the composition of cell surface structures showed that compared to AGR1485, AGR1487 had a smaller genome, utilized different sugars, and had greater tolerance to acid and bile. The effect of the two strains on intestinal barrier integrity was determined using two independent measures of paracellular permeability of the intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cell line. The transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) assay specifically measures ion permeability, whereas the mannitol flux assay measures the passage of uncharged molecules. Both live and UV-inactivated AGR1487 decreased TEER across Caco-2 cells implicating the cell surfaces structures in the effect. However, only live AGR1487, and not UV-inactivated AGR1487, increased the rate of passage of mannitol, implying that a secreted component(s) is responsible for this effect. These differences in barrier integrity results are likely due to the TEER and mannitol flux assays measuring different characteristics of the epithelial barrier, and therefore imply that there are multiple mechanisms involved in the effect of AGR1487 on barrier integrity.Entities:
Keywords: Inflammatory; Lactobacillus fermentum; germ-free rodents; intestinal barrier integrity; tight junctions
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25943073 PMCID: PMC4554451 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
Figure 1Four treatment groups of AGR1485 and AGR1487 supernatants that were produced for testing in the TEER assay. All treatments were made in M199 supplemented with 1% nonessential amino acids.
Figure 2Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of AGR1485 and AGR1487 genomic DNA digested with restriction enzyme I-CeuI. The marker ladder contained lambda DNA, where the fragments were multimers of 48.5 kb (from gel bottom upwards 48.5, 87, 145.5, 194 kb etc.). The values given are the sizes (kb) of the DNA fragments from the bacterial strains.
Figure 3Viability of AGR1485 and AGR1487 in (A) 0.3% bile in MRS broth, (B) different concentrations of bile in MRS agar, and (C and D) MRS broth at different pH values. The values plotted are the means of three replicates and the error bars show SEM. *P < 0.05 compared to control MRS broth or agar at the same time point.
Figure 4Effect of AGR1485 and AGR1487 at different growth phases on TEER across Caco-2 cell monolayers over time. Growth curves of (A) AGR1485 and (B) AGR1487 showing the optical densities that were selected to represent each growth phase (black data points). Values shown are the means of three replicates. Effect of log phase (C) AGR1485 and (D) AGR1487, and stationary phase (E) AGR1485, and (F) AGR1487 on TEER. The plotted values are the means of 12 replicates (four replicates per run, three independent runs) and the error bars show the SEM. The least significant difference levels at 5% probability (5% LSD) are given.
Figure 5Effect of metabolites produced by (A) AGR1485 or (B) AGR1487 on TEER across Caco-2 cell monolayers over time. Treatment 1: Bacteria alone; Treatment 2: Bacteria cultured with Caco-2 cell monolayers; Treatment 3: Bacteria cultured with Caco-2 cell debris; Treatment 4: Bacteria cultured with Caco-2 cell supernatant. The plotted values are the means of 12 replicates (four replicates per run, three independent runs) and the error bars show the SEM. The least significant difference levels at 5% probability (5% LSD) are given.
Figure 6Effect of live and UV-killed AGR1485 and AGR1487 on (A) TEER and (B) mannitol flux across Caco-2 cell monolayers over time. The plotted values are the means of 12 replicates (four replicates per run, three independent runs) and the error bars show the SEM. For the TEER data, the least significant difference levels at 5% probability (5% LSD) is given. For the mannitol flux data, the *indicate P < 0.05 compared to the control.