Literature DB >> 25942525

Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2012.

Bina Rawal1, Bryan R Deane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the timely disclosure of results of company-sponsored clinical trials related to all new medicines approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) during 2012. This is an extension of the previously reported study of trials related to all new medicines approved in Europe in 2009, 2010 and 2011, which found that over three-quarters of all these trials were disclosed within 12 months and almost 90% were disclosed by the end of the study.
METHODS: The methodology used was exactly as previously reported. Various publicly available information sources were searched for both clinical trial registration and disclosure of results. All completed company-sponsored trials related to each new medicine approved for marketing by the EMA in 2012, carried out in patients and recorded on a clinical trials registry and/or included in an EMA European Public Assessment Report (EPAR), were included. Information sources were searched between 1 May and 31 July 2014. OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: The main outcome measure was the proportion of trials for which results had been disclosed on a registry or in the scientific literature either within 12 months of the later of either first regulatory approval or trial completion, or by 31 July 2014 (end of survey). Of the completed trials associated with 23 new medicines licensed to 17 different companies in 2012, results of 90% (307/340) had been disclosed within 12 months, and results of 92% (312/340) had been disclosed by 31 July 2014.
CONCLUSIONS: The disclosure rate within 12 months of 90% suggests the industry is now achieving disclosure in a timely manner more consistently than before. The overall disclosure rate at study end of 92% indicates that the improvement in transparency amongst company-sponsored trials has been maintained in the trials associated with new medicines approved in 2012.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Publication bias; Results disclosure; Transparency; Trial publication; Trial registration; Trial registries

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25942525     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1047749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmaceutical Benefit-Risk Communication Tools: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dominic Way; Hortense Blazsin; Ragnar Löfstedt; Frederic Bouder
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  William T Gattrell; Sally Hopewell; Kate Young; Paul Farrow; Richard White; Elizabeth Wager; Christopher C Winchester
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.

Authors:  Gary Evoniuk; Bernadette Mansi; Barbara DeCastro; Jennie Sykes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-04-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.