Literature DB >> 25942522

Assessment of a wound cleansing solution in the treatment of problem wounds.

Anneke E Andriessen1, Thomas Eberlein.   

Abstract

 Chronic wounds will heal in most cases if provided an optimal local wound environment and therapy that addresses underlying disease. The quality of topical wound management will influence the speed of the wound healing process. The value of cleansing chronic wounds is considered a basic principle in modern wound management. Several methods are available for wound cleansing and debridement. Currently, there has been focus on measures of wound cleansing whereby debris and exudate are gently and continuously removed to prepare the wound bed for wound closure. For this purpose, physiological solutions or specific disinfectants may be used. This retrospective analysis of existing data was performed looking at the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using a wound antiseptic to treat problem wounds. Wound cleansing upon dressing changes using a polyhexanide containing solution (Prontosan®, B Braun, Melsungen AG, Germany) in venous leg ulcers was compared to cleansing with either Ringer's solution or saline. The wounds of the patients treated with polyhexanide solution healed faster and in more cases (97% versus 89%). The Kaplan-Meier mean estimate (and associated standard error [SE]) demonstrated a statistically significant difference between treatment groups (P < 0.0001) in time to healing. The Kaplan-Meier mean time to healing for the study group (SG) was 3.31 months (SE = 0.17) compared to 4.42 months (SE = 0.19) for the control group ([CG], saline/Ringer's solution). .

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 25942522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wounds        ISSN: 1044-7946            Impact factor:   1.546


  8 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a polyhexanide irrigation solution on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a porcine wound model.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Andrew Harding; Joel Gil; Fernando Parajon; Jose Valdes; Michael Solis; Alex Higa
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Mode of action of poloxamer-based surfactants in wound care and efficacy on biofilms.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Rui Chen; Dieter Mayer; Anne-Marie Salisbury
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Bacterial floras and biofilms of malignant wounds associated with breast cancers.

Authors:  Isabelle Fromantin; Damien Seyer; Sarah Watson; Florence Rollot; Jacqueline Elard; Marie Christine Escande; Yann De Rycke; Irène Kriegel; Véronique Larreta Garde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Wound cleansing for treating venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Niamh Em McLain; Zena Eh Moore; Pinar Avsar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-10

5.  Decolonization potential of 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution in urethral catheters under practice-like in vitro conditions.

Authors:  Florian H H Brill; Henrik Gabriel; Holger Brill; Jan-Hendrik Klock; Joerg Steinmann; Andreas Arndt
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Povidone-iodine ointment demonstrates in vitro efficacy against biofilm formation.

Authors:  Matthias J Hoekstra; Samantha J Westgate; Stefan Mueller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  The impact of topical agents and dressing on pH and temperature on wound healing: A systematic, narrative review.

Authors:  Rosemarie Derwin; Declan Patton; Pinar Avsar; Helen Strapp; Zena Moore
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.099

8.  Antibiofilm Properties of Antiseptic Agents Used on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Koko Barrigah-Benissan; Jerome Ory; Catherine Dunyach-Remy; Cassandra Pouget; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Albert Sotto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 6.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.