Helena Podrouzkova1, Helena Bedanova2, Martin Tretina2, Josef Korinek1,3, Radka Stepanova4, Jana Hruskova1, Petr Nemec2, Tomas Konecny1, Marek Orban1,2. 1. ICRC, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic. 2. Center of Cardiovascular and Transplant Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno. 3. 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague. 4. Department of Biostatistics, ICRC, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Around 20-40% of heart transplant patients experience moderate to severe rejection within the first year after heart transplantation. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a gold standard for diagnosing heart transplant rejection. There is a need for non-invasive alternatives that allow for early, safe and reliable diagnosis of acute graft rejection prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. AIMS: Our aim was to investigate the potential of speckle tracking derived strain analysis in the diagnosis of acute graft rejection. METHODS: Patients indicated for EMB consented to a trans-thoracic echocardiography examination (TTE) within 2 hours of the EMB. Of this cohort, those with at least 2 EMBs separated ≥ 1 week, and whose TTE could be analyzed for strain, were included. The relationship between strain and EMB results was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients included (mean age 51.33±1.79, 67% male), 23 had findings of rejection identified on at least one EMB and at least one EMB without rejection for comparison. A significant deterioration in the longitudinal strain during rejection compared to non-rejection was found on apical 4-chamber views (-11.51±0.91 vs -13.48±0.96, P=0.025) and apical 2-chamber views (-11.84±0.78 vs -14.43±0.83, P=0.002). In the patients in whom no rejection was identified on either EBM, there was no significant change in longitudinal strain values at two different time points. CONCLUSION: Worsening of longitudinal strain was associated with acute cellular rejection. Routine TTE-based strain analysis could help in early detection of cardiac rejection and timing of EMB.
BACKGROUND: Around 20-40% of heart transplant patients experience moderate to severe rejection within the first year after heart transplantation. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a gold standard for diagnosing heart transplant rejection. There is a need for non-invasive alternatives that allow for early, safe and reliable diagnosis of acute graft rejection prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. AIMS: Our aim was to investigate the potential of speckle tracking derived strain analysis in the diagnosis of acute graft rejection. METHODS:Patients indicated for EMB consented to a trans-thoracic echocardiography examination (TTE) within 2 hours of the EMB. Of this cohort, those with at least 2 EMBs separated ≥ 1 week, and whose TTE could be analyzed for strain, were included. The relationship between strain and EMB results was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients included (mean age 51.33±1.79, 67% male), 23 had findings of rejection identified on at least one EMB and at least one EMB without rejection for comparison. A significant deterioration in the longitudinal strain during rejection compared to non-rejection was found on apical 4-chamber views (-11.51±0.91 vs -13.48±0.96, P=0.025) and apical 2-chamber views (-11.84±0.78 vs -14.43±0.83, P=0.002). In the patients in whom no rejection was identified on either EBM, there was no significant change in longitudinal strain values at two different time points. CONCLUSION: Worsening of longitudinal strain was associated with acute cellular rejection. Routine TTE-based strain analysis could help in early detection of cardiac rejection and timing of EMB.
Authors: Justin Godown; Debra A Dodd; Michael Stanley; Corey Havens; Meng Xu; James C Slaughter; David W Bearl; Jonathan H Soslow Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2018-03-25
Authors: Justin Godown; William A McEachern; Debra A Dodd; Michael Stanley; Corey Havens; Meng Xu; James C Slaughter; David W Bearl; Jonathan H Soslow Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Jihye You; Jeong Jin Yu; Mi Jin Kim; Seulgi Cha; Jae Suk Baek; Eun Seok Choi; Bo Sang Kwon; Chun Soo Park; Tae-Jin Yun; Young-Hwue Kim Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Roman Panovský; Martin Pešl; Jan Máchal; Tomáš Holeček; Věra Feitová; Lenka Juříková; Lucia Masárová; Eva Pešlová; Lukáš Opatřil; Mary Luz Mojica-Pisciotti; Vladimír Kincl Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 4.123