Literature DB >> 25942367

Fixed Bearings versus Rotating Platforms in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Peter B White1, Amar S Ranawat1, Chitranjan S Ranawat1.   

Abstract

Rotating platforms were introduced as an alternative to fixed bearings in hopes of providing more natural kinematics and improved clinical outcomes. In-vitro wear studies showed significantly less wear with rotating platforms as opposed to fixed-bearing designs. Kinematic follow-up studies showed significantly improved axial rotation with rotating-platform knees. However, these benefits have failed to translate into improved clinical outcomes or survivorship. This article reviews our institution's experience, as well as the latest clinical research on wear, kinematics, clinical outcomes, and survivorship of fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25942367     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1550338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  2 in total

1.  Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.

Authors:  Oystein Gothesen; Stein Hakon L Lygre; Michelle Lorimer; Stephen Graves; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Spontaneous 180-Degree Rotatory Dislocation of Rotating-Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen Sierra; Chibuzo Akalonu; Kevin West; Matthew Blue; George Brindley
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.