Literature DB >> 25941220

Determination of appropriate weight-based cutoffs for empiric cefazolin dosing using data from a phase 1 pharmacokinetics and safety study of cefazolin administered for surgical prophylaxis in pediatric patients aged 10 to 12 years.

Michael L Schmitz1, Jeffrey L Blumer2, Wes Cetnarowski3, Christopher M Rubino4.   

Abstract

Despite over 40 years of worldwide usage, relatively few data have been published on the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in pediatric surgical patients. The primary objectives of this study were to examine the pharmacokinetics and safety of cefazolin in children 10 to 12 years of age (inclusive) receiving 1 or 2 g of cefazolin, based on body weight. This multiple-center, open-label study enrolled pediatric patients electively scheduled for surgical procedures who required cefazolin as part of their routine clinical management. Patients weighing ≥25 to <50 kg received a 1-g dose, and patients weighing ≥50 to ≤85 kg received a 2-g dose. Postdose pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were conducted following drug administration. Cefazolin concentration-time data were analyzed by using both noncompartmental and population pharmacokinetics methods. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to identify appropriate weight-based cutoffs for the dosing of children aged 10 to 17 years of age. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study and provided the requisite pharmacokinetic data. In general, cefazolin was well tolerated. The mean cefazolin terminal elimination half-life, clearance, and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity in this population were 1.95 h, 0.804 ml/min/kg, and 607 mg · h/liter, respectively. Patients weighing 50 to 60 kg exhibited elevated cefazolin exposures. Observed pharmacokinetic parameters and simulation results indicated that a weight-based cutoff of 60 kg is predicted to provide cefazolin exposure consistent with that observed in normal, healthy adults at recommended doses for surgical prophylaxis. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01904357.).
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25941220      PMCID: PMC4468723          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00082-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

Review 1.  Methodological issues in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  E Bellissant; V Sébille; G Paintaud
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Current guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wounds.

Authors:  R K Woods; E P Dellinger
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Keith M Olsen; Trish M Perl; Paul G Auwaerter; Maureen K Bolon; Douglas N Fish; Lena M Napolitano; Robert G Sawyer; Douglas Slain; James P Steinberg; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  CDC growth charts: United States.

Authors:  R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2000-06-08

5.  Pharmacodynamics of cefazolin in the presence of normal and impaired renal function.

Authors:  M F Rein; F B Westervelt; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations of cefazolin in pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  M C Nahata; D E Durrell; M E Ginn-Pease; D R King
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

7.  The population approach to pharmacokinetic data analysis: rationale and standard data analysis methods.

Authors:  L B Sheiner
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.518

Review 8.  Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  E P Dellinger; P A Gross; T L Barrett; P J Krause; W J Martone; J E McGowan; R L Sweet; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Prediction of the distribution volumes of cefazolin and tobramycin in obese children based on physiological pharmacokinetic concepts.

Authors:  R Koshida; E Nakashima; N Taniguchi; A Tsuji; L Z Benet; F Ichimura
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Comparative distribution kinetics of cefazolin and tobramycin in children.

Authors:  R Koshida; E Nakashima; F Ichimura; O Nakano; R Watanabe; N Taniguchi; A Tsuji
Journal:  J Pharmacobiodyn       Date:  1987-09
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Drug Dose Selection in Pediatric Obesity: Available Information for the Most Commonly Prescribed Drugs to Children.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kyler; Jonathan Wagner; Chelsea Hosey-Cojocari; Kevin Watt; Valentina Shakhnovich
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Cefazolin pharmacokinetics in premature infants.

Authors:  Stephen J Balevic; P Brian Smith; Daniela Testoni; Huali Wu; Kim L R Brouwer; Kanecia O Zimmerman; Nazario D Rivera-Chaparro; Daniel K Benjamin; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dose Selection of Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis of Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Michael L Schmitz; Christopher M Rubino; Nikolas J Onufrak; Diana Valencia Martinez; Diane Licursi; Angela Karpf; Wes Cetnarowski
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.126

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.