BACKGROUND: Palliative care needs among patients in the neurological intensive care unit (neuroICU) are poorly characterized. Our aim was to explore the prevalence and type of potential palliative care consultation triggers in neuroICUs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neuroICU admissions in Project IMPACT from 2001 to 2008. We assessed the prevalence of neuroICU admissions meeting one or more of five validated palliative care consultation triggers and compared the percentage of admissions meeting these triggers in other ICUs from the same hospitals. RESULTS: Among 1268 admissions to 2 neuroICUs, 200 (15.8 %) met one or more triggers for palliative care consultation. Among 13,694 admissions to non-neuroICUs in the same hospitals, 1909 (13.9 %) met one or more palliative care triggers (p = 0.44). The most common trigger in the neuroICU was intracerebral hemorrhage with mechanical ventilation (n = 92; 7.3 %). The most common trigger in non-neuroICUs was ICU admission following ≥10-day hospital stay (n = 805; 5.9 %). Although ICU mortality was not significantly higher in neuroICU vs. non-neuroICU patients meeting triggers (23.4 vs 19.9 %, p = 0.46), neuroICU patients were significantly more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (19.4 vs 8.0 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among neuroICU patients, 15.8 % met triggers for palliative care consultation. Although prevalence of admissions meeting any trigger was similar amongst all ICUs, neuroICU admissions met different types of triggers and were more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. These data suggest that palliative care needs are common among neuroICU patients and discussions with patients and families regarding limitation of life-sustaining therapy may differ in this setting.
BACKGROUND: Palliative care needs among patients in the neurological intensive care unit (neuroICU) are poorly characterized. Our aim was to explore the prevalence and type of potential palliative care consultation triggers in neuroICUs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neuroICU admissions in Project IMPACT from 2001 to 2008. We assessed the prevalence of neuroICU admissions meeting one or more of five validated palliative care consultation triggers and compared the percentage of admissions meeting these triggers in other ICUs from the same hospitals. RESULTS: Among 1268 admissions to 2 neuroICUs, 200 (15.8 %) met one or more triggers for palliative care consultation. Among 13,694 admissions to non-neuroICUs in the same hospitals, 1909 (13.9 %) met one or more palliative care triggers (p = 0.44). The most common trigger in the neuroICU was intracerebral hemorrhage with mechanical ventilation (n = 92; 7.3 %). The most common trigger in non-neuroICUs was ICU admission following ≥10-day hospital stay (n = 805; 5.9 %). Although ICU mortality was not significantly higher in neuroICU vs. non-neuroICU patients meeting triggers (23.4 vs 19.9 %, p = 0.46), neuroICU patients were significantly more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (19.4 vs 8.0 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among neuroICU patients, 15.8 % met triggers for palliative care consultation. Although prevalence of admissions meeting any trigger was similar amongst all ICUs, neuroICU admissions met different types of triggers and were more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. These data suggest that palliative care needs are common among neuroICU patients and discussions with patients and families regarding limitation of life-sustaining therapy may differ in this setting.
Authors: K J Becker; A B Baxter; W A Cohen; H M Bybee; D L Tirschwell; D W Newell; H R Winn; W T Longstreth Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-03-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Judith E Nelson; J Randall Curtis; Colleen Mulkerin; Margaret Campbell; Dana R Lustbader; Anne C Mosenthal; Kathleen Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Karen J Brasel; Jennifer A Frontera; Ross M Hays; David E Weissman Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robert G Holloway; Susan Ladwig; Jessica Robb; Adam Kelly; Eric Nielsen; Timothy E Quill Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Robert G Holloway; Robert M Arnold; Claire J Creutzfeldt; Eldrin F Lewis; Barbara J Lutz; Robert M McCann; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Gustavo Saposnik; Kevin N Sheth; Darin B Zahuranec; Gregory J Zipfel; Richard D Zorowitz Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Judith E Nelson; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Karen J Brasel; Margaret L Campbell; Therese B Cortez; J Randall Curtis; Dana R Lustbader; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen A Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; David E Weissman Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: I J Higginson; C Rumble; C Shipman; J Koffman; K E Sleeman; M Morgan; P Hopkins; J Noble; W Bernal; S Leonard; O Dampier; W Prentice; R Burman; M Costantini Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 2.217