Literature DB >> 25940684

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of Arm Kinematics With and Without a Trunk Restraint During a Reaching Task in Individuals With Stroke.

Kuan-yi Li1, Keh-chung Lin2, Chih-kuang Chen3, Rong-jiuan Liing4, Ching-yi Wu5, Wan-ying Chang6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the concurrent and predictive validity of measurements of kinematic variables during reaching tasks with and without a trunk constraint in individuals with stroke.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trials. SETTINGS: Hospitals and a laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with stroke (N=95) enrolled in previous and ongoing clinical trials.
INTERVENTIONS: Upper limb training protocols were 90 to 120 minutes of intervention every weekday for 3 to 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional capacity was assessed using the Action Research Arm Test and motor impairment using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity. Movement kinematics were measured during a reaching task with and without a trunk constraint. We derived 5 endpoint control variables and 3 joint recruitment variables for estimating concurrent and predictive validity.
RESULTS: The adjusted R(2) values for the constraint tasks ranged from .24 to .38 and for the unconstraint tasks from .29 to .40. Movement time was the most prominent kinematic variable for the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity before and after the intervention (P<.05). For the Action Research Arm Test, movement time and endpoint displacement were the most significant variables before and after the intervention, respectively (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring kinematic performance during an unconstrained task is appropriate and possibly sufficient to represent motor impairment and functional capacity of individuals with stroke. Movement time is the dominant variable associated with motor impairment and functional capacity, and endpoint displacement is unique in reflecting functional capacity of individuals with stroke.
Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional residual capacity; Kinematics; Motor; Rehabilitation; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940684     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  5 in total

1.  Using Inertial Measurement Units and Electromyography to Quantify Movement during Action Research Arm Test Execution.

Authors:  Eva Repnik; Urška Puh; Nika Goljar; Marko Munih; Matjaž Mihelj
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  End-point kinematics using virtual reality explaining upper limb impairment and activity capacity in stroke.

Authors:  Netha Hussain; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Margit Alt Murphy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Measures of Interjoint Coordination Post-stroke Across Different Upper Limb Movement Tasks.

Authors:  Anne Schwarz; Janne M Veerbeek; Jeremia P O Held; Jaap H Buurke; Andreas R Luft
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28

4.  Association Between Finger-to-Nose Kinematics and Upper Extremity Motor Function in Subacute Stroke: A Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Ze-Jian Chen; Chang He; Nan Xia; Ming-Hui Gu; Yang-An Li; Cai-Hua Xiong; Jiang Xu; Xiao-Lin Huang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-12

5.  Quantifying Quality of Reaching Movements Longitudinally Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  M Saes; M I Mohamed Refai; B J F van Beijnum; J B J Bussmann; E P Jansma; P H Veltink; J H Buurke; E E H van Wegen; C G M Meskers; J W Krakauer; G Kwakkel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.