Literature DB >> 25940466

Comparison on the molecular response profiles between nano zinc oxide (ZnO) particles and free zinc ion using a genome-wide toxicogenomics approach.

Guanyong Su1, Xiaowei Zhang2, John P Giesy1,3,4, Javed Musarrat5, Quaiser Saquib5, Abdulaziz A Alkhedhairy5, Hongxia Yu6.   

Abstract

Increasing production and applications of nano zinc oxide particles (nano-ZnO) enhances the probability of its exposure in occupational and environmental settings, but toxicity studies are still limited. Taking the free Zn ion (Zn(2+)) as a control, cytotoxicity of a commercially available nano-ZnO was assessed with a 6-h exposure in Escherichia coli (E. coli). The fitted dose-cytotoxicity curve for ZnCl2 was significantly sharper than that from nano-ZnO. Then, a genome-wide gene expression profile following exposure to nano-ZnO was conducted by use of a live cell reporter assay system with library of 1820 modified green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing promoter reporter vectors constructed from E. coli K12 strains, which resulted in 387 significantly altered genes in bacterial (p < 0.001). These altered genes were enriched into ten biological processing and two cell components (p < 0.05) terms through statistical hypergeometric testing, strongly suggesting that exposure to nano-ZnO would result a great disturbance on the functional gene product synthesis processing, such as translation, gene expression, RNA modification, and structural constituent of ribosome. The pattern of expression of 37 genes altered by nano-ZnO (fold change>2) was different from the profile following exposure to 6 mg/L of free zinc ion. The result indicates that these two Zn forms might cause toxicity to bacterial in different modes of action. Our results underscore the importance of understanding the adverse effects elicited by nano-ZnO after entering aquatic environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytotoxicity; Gene expression; Gene set enrichment analysis; Nanoparticle; Pathways

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940466     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4507-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  36 in total

Review 1.  Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel.

Authors:  Andre Nel; Tian Xia; Lutz Mädler; Ning Li
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Freundlich and dual Langmuir isotherm models for predicting 137Cs binding on Savannah River Site soils.

Authors:  Momoko Goto; Robert Rosson; J Marion Wampler; W Crawford Elliott; Steven Serkiz; Bernd Kahn
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Toxicological effect of ZnO nanoparticles based on bacteria.

Authors:  Zhongbing Huang; Xu Zheng; Danhong Yan; Guangfu Yin; Xiaoming Liao; Yunqing Kang; Yadong Yao; Di Huang; Baoqing Hao
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Effect of TiO, nanoparticles on the interface in the PET-rubber composites.

Authors:  Cristina Vladuta; Luminita Andronic; Anca Duta
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-04

6.  Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium.

Authors:  Roberta Brayner; Roselyne Ferrari-Iliou; Nicolas Brivois; Shakib Djediat; Marc F Benedetti; Fernand Fiévet
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  ZnO particulate matter requires cell contact for toxicity in human colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Philip J Moos; Kevin Chung; David Woessner; Matthew Honeggar; N Shane Cutler; John M Veranth
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Nanosized zinc oxide particles induce neural stem cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Deng; Qixia Luan; Wenting Chen; Yanli Wang; Minghong Wu; Haijiao Zhang; Zheng Jiao
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.874

9.  SlyA, a MarR family transcriptional regulator, is essential for virulence in Dickeya dadantii 3937.

Authors:  M Manjurul Haque; M Shahinur Kabir; Luqman Qurata Aini; Hisae Hirata; Shinji Tsuyumu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by four typical nanomaterials: the role of particle size, shape and composition.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Chao Liu; Danfeng Yang; Huashan Zhang; Zhuge Xi
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.446

View more
  6 in total

1.  Molecular and cellular effects of contamination in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Miriam Hampel; Julian Blasco; Helmut Segner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future.

Authors:  Linlin Wang; Chen Hu; Longquan Shao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-02-14

3.  Physicochemical characteristics and toxicity of surface-modified zinc oxide nanoparticles to freshwater and marine microalgae.

Authors:  Mana M N Yung; Paul-Antoine Fougères; Yu Hang Leung; Fangzhou Liu; Aleksandra B Djurišić; John P Giesy; Kenneth M Y Leung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Antimicrobial Resistance and Inorganic Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Andrea-Sarahí Balderrama-González; Hilda-Amelia Piñón-Castillo; Claudia-Adriana Ramírez-Valdespino; Linda-Lucila Landeros-Martínez; Erasmo Orrantia-Borunda; Hilda-Esperanza Esparza-Ponce
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Nanobiotics against antimicrobial resistance: harnessing the power of nanoscale materials and technologies.

Authors:  Nayanika Chakraborty; Diksha Jha; Indrajit Roy; Pradeep Kumar; Shailendra Singh Gaurav; Kalisvar Marimuthu; Oon-Tek Ng; Rajamani Lakshminarayanan; Navin Kumar Verma; Hemant K Gautam
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 9.429

Review 6.  Nanoparticles in the environment: where do we come from, where do we go to?

Authors:  Mirco Bundschuh; Juliane Filser; Simon Lüderwald; Moira S McKee; George Metreveli; Gabriele E Schaumann; Ralf Schulz; Stephan Wagner
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.893

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.