OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether maternal employment during pregnancy - overall and in selected occupational sectors - is associated with birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), term low birth weight (LBW), length of gestation, and preterm delivery in a population-based birth cohort design. METHODS: We used data from >200 000 mother-child pairs enrolled in 13 European birth cohorts and compared employed versus non-employed women. Among employees, we defined groups of occupations representing the main sectors of employment for women where potential reproductive hazards are considered to be present. The comparison group comprised all other employed women not included in the occupational sector being assessed. We performed meta-analyses of cohort-specific estimates and explored heterogeneity. RESULTS: Employees had a lower risk of preterm delivery than non-employees [adjusted odds ratio (OR adj) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.81-0.91]. Working in most of the occupational sectors studied was not associated with adverse birth outcomes. Being employed as a nurse was associated with lower risk SGA infants (OR adj0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99) whereas food industry workers had an increased risk of preterm delivery (OR adj1.50, 95% CI 1.12-2.02). There was little evidence for heterogeneity between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, overall, employment during pregnancy is associated with a reduction in the risk of preterm birth and that work in certain occupations may affect pregnancy outcomes. This exploratory study provides an important platform on which to base further prospective studies focused on the potential consequences of maternal occupational exposures during pregnancy on child development.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether maternal employment during pregnancy - overall and in selected occupational sectors - is associated with birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), term low birth weight (LBW), length of gestation, and preterm delivery in a population-based birth cohort design. METHODS: We used data from >200 000 mother-child pairs enrolled in 13 European birth cohorts and compared employed versus non-employed women. Among employees, we defined groups of occupations representing the main sectors of employment for women where potential reproductive hazards are considered to be present. The comparison group comprised all other employed women not included in the occupational sector being assessed. We performed meta-analyses of cohort-specific estimates and explored heterogeneity. RESULTS: Employees had a lower risk of preterm delivery than non-employees [adjusted odds ratio (OR adj) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.81-0.91]. Working in most of the occupational sectors studied was not associated with adverse birth outcomes. Being employed as a nurse was associated with lower risk SGA infants (OR adj0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99) whereas food industry workers had an increased risk of preterm delivery (OR adj1.50, 95% CI 1.12-2.02). There was little evidence for heterogeneity between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, overall, employment during pregnancy is associated with a reduction in the risk of preterm birth and that work in certain occupations may affect pregnancy outcomes. This exploratory study provides an important platform on which to base further prospective studies focused on the potential consequences of maternal occupational exposures during pregnancy on child development.
Authors: Qingyang Xiao; Hanyi Chen; Matthew J Strickland; Haidong Kan; Howard H Chang; Mitchel Klein; Chen Yang; Xia Meng; Yang Liu Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Laura Birks; Maribel Casas; Ana M Garcia; Jan Alexander; Henrique Barros; Anna Bergström; Jens Peter Bonde; Alex Burdorf; Nathalie Costet; Asta Danileviciute; Merete Eggesbø; Mariana F Fernández; M Carmen González-Galarzo; Wojciech Hanke; Vincent Jaddoe; Manolis Kogevinas; Inger Kull; Aitana Lertxundi; Vasiliki Melaki; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Nicolás Olea; Kinga Polanska; Franca Rusconi; Loreto Santa-Marina; Ana Cristina Santos; Tanja Vrijkotte; Daniela Zugna; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Sylvaine Cordier; Martine Vrijheid Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Anna A Usynina; Andrej M Grjibovski; Jon Øyvind Odland; Alexandra Krettek Journal: Int J Circumpolar Health Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 1.228
Authors: Mariana Buen; Eliana Amaral; Renato T Souza; Renato Passini; Giuliane J Lajos; Ricardo P Tedesco; Marcelo L Nomura; Tábata Z Dias; Patrícia M Rehder; Maria Helena Sousa; José Guilherme Cecatti Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 4.379