Heather L Crouse1, Francisco Torres2, Henry Vaides2, Michael T Walsh3, Elise M Ishigami3, Andrea T Cruz1, Susan B Torrey1,4, Miguel A Soto2. 1. a Department of Pediatrics, Section of Emergency Medicine , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , Texas , USA. 2. b Department of Pediatrics , Hospital Nacional Pedro Bethancourt , La Antigua , Guatemala. 3. c Global Health Initiative , Texas Children's Hospital , Houston , Texas , USA. 4. d Department of Emergency Medicine , Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine , New York City , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Triage process implementation has been shown to be effective at improving patient outcomes. This study sought to develop, implement and assess the impact of an Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT)-based emergency triage process in the paediatric emergency department (PED) of a public hospital in Guatemala. METHODS: The study was a quality improvement comparison with a before/after design. Uptake was measured by percentage of patients with an assigned triage category. Outcomes were hospital admission rate, inpatient length of stay (LOS), and mortality as determined by two distinct medical record reviews for 1 year pre- and post-intervention: a random sample (RS) of all PED patients and records for all critically-ill (CI) children [serious diagnoses or admission to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU)]. Demographics, diagnoses and disposition were recorded. RESULTS: The RS totalled 1027 (51.4% male); median ages pre- and post-intervention were 2.0 and 2.4 years, respectively. There were 196 patients in the CI sample, of whom 56.6% were male and one-third were neonates; median ages of the CI group pre- and post-intervention were 3.1 and 5.6 months, respectively. One year after implementation, 97.5% of medical records had been assigned triage categories. Triage categories (RS/CI) were: emergency (2.9%/54.6%), priority (47.6%/44.4%) and non-urgent (49.4%/1.0%). The CI group was more frequently diagnosed with shock (25%/1%), seizures (9%/0.5%) and malnutrition (6%/0.5%). Admission rates for the RS (8% vs 4%, P=0.01) declined after implementation. For the CI sample, admission rate to the PICU (47% vs 24%, P=0.002) decreased and LOS (7.3 vs 5.7 days, P=0.09) and mortality rates (12% vs 6%, P=0.15) showed trends toward decreasing post-implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric-specific triage algorithms can be implemented and sustained in resource-limited settings. Significant decreases in admission rates (both overall and for the PICU) and trends towards decreased LOS and mortality rates of critically ill children suggest that ETAT-based triage systems have the potential to greatly improve patient care in Latin America.
BACKGROUND: Triage process implementation has been shown to be effective at improving patient outcomes. This study sought to develop, implement and assess the impact of an Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT)-based emergency triage process in the paediatric emergency department (PED) of a public hospital in Guatemala. METHODS: The study was a quality improvement comparison with a before/after design. Uptake was measured by percentage of patients with an assigned triage category. Outcomes were hospital admission rate, inpatient length of stay (LOS), and mortality as determined by two distinct medical record reviews for 1 year pre- and post-intervention: a random sample (RS) of all PED patients and records for all critically-ill (CI) children [serious diagnoses or admission to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU)]. Demographics, diagnoses and disposition were recorded. RESULTS: The RS totalled 1027 (51.4% male); median ages pre- and post-intervention were 2.0 and 2.4 years, respectively. There were 196 patients in the CI sample, of whom 56.6% were male and one-third were neonates; median ages of the CI group pre- and post-intervention were 3.1 and 5.6 months, respectively. One year after implementation, 97.5% of medical records had been assigned triage categories. Triage categories (RS/CI) were: emergency (2.9%/54.6%), priority (47.6%/44.4%) and non-urgent (49.4%/1.0%). The CI group was more frequently diagnosed with shock (25%/1%), seizures (9%/0.5%) and malnutrition (6%/0.5%). Admission rates for the RS (8% vs 4%, P=0.01) declined after implementation. For the CI sample, admission rate to the PICU (47% vs 24%, P=0.002) decreased and LOS (7.3 vs 5.7 days, P=0.09) and mortality rates (12% vs 6%, P=0.15) showed trends toward decreasing post-implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric-specific triage algorithms can be implemented and sustained in resource-limited settings. Significant decreases in admission rates (both overall and for the PICU) and trends towards decreased LOS and mortality rates of critically ill children suggest that ETAT-based triage systems have the potential to greatly improve patient care in Latin America.
Entities:
Keywords:
BCM/TCH, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children’s Hospital; CETEP, Clasificación Evaluación y Tratamiento de Emergencias Pediátricas; CI, critically ill sample; Clasificación; ETAT; Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment; Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT); Evaluación y Tratamiento de Emergencias Pediátricas (CETEP); HCW, shealthcare workers; HNPB, Hospital Nacional Pedro Bethancourt; International emergency medicine; LOS, inpatient length of stay; MoH, Guatemalan Ministry of Health; PAHO, Pan-American Health Organization; PED, paediatric emergency department; PICU, paediatric intensive care unit; Paediatric emergency medicine; Paediatric triage; QI, quality improvement; RS, random sample
Authors: Rupa Kapoor; Leslie Avendaño; Maria Antonieta Sandoval; Andrea T Cruz; Esther M Sampayo; Miguel A Soto; Elizabeth A Camp; Heather L Crouse Journal: Glob Pediatr Health Date: 2017-07-13
Authors: Robert O Opoka; Andrew S Ssemata; William Oyang; Harriet Nambuya; Chandy C John; James K Tumwine; Charles Karamagi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Nabila Zaka; Emma C Alexander; Logan Manikam; Irena C F Norman; Melika Akhbari; Sarah Moxon; Pavani Kalluri Ram; Georgina Murphy; Mike English; Susan Niermeyer; Luwei Pearson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Johanna Dekker-Boersema; Jonas Hector; Laura Frances Jefferys; Clemência Binamo; Deavis Camilo; Gerard Muganga; Mussa Manuel Aly; Ernesto Belario Rafael Langa; Penelope Vounatsou; Michael André Hobbins Journal: Afr J Emerg Med Date: 2019-07-02
Authors: Christopher Hands; Sandra Hands; Madeleine Verriotis; James Bunn; Emma Bailey; Robert J Samuels; Kadiatu Sankoh; Ayeshatu Mustapha; Bhanu Williams; Sebastian Taylor Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2021-12-18 Impact factor: 4.413