Literature DB >> 25940211

A Single-Center Experience with the NeuroPace RNS System: A Review of Techniques and Potential Problems.

Brian Lee1, Muhammad N Zubair2, Yvette D Marquez2, David M Lee2, Laura A Kalayjian3, Christianne N Heck3, Charles Y Liu4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The clinical results for the RNS System (NeuroPace, Mountain View, California, USA) closed-loop responsive neurostimulator for the treatment of medically intractable partial-onset seizures have been encouraging. The University of Southern California (USC) Neurorestoration Center and the Keck Hospital of USC have become the world's first institutions to implant an RNS System post U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. As one of the study centers, we review our experience with our group of patients who have been implanted with the RNS System.
METHODS: A total of 40 surgeries by a single surgeon were performed on 10 patients (7 male and 3 female) with an average age of 39.2 years (24-66 years) and were followed for an average of 45 months (30-54 months). The average age at seizure onset was 14 years (birth-37 years) with an average of 4.7 (3-12) failed antiepileptic drugs. We reviewed the patients' charts for complications from the surgeries including infections requiring surgical intervention, hematomas, hardware failures, and death.
RESULTS: Of the 40 surgeries, there were 10 initial implantations of the neurostimulator and leads, 24 neurostimulator replacements for expected end of neurostimulator service, 2 incision and drainage procedures (I & Ds) for soft tissue infection followed by 1 explantation and 1 reimplantation (same patient), and 2 revisions because of one lead that was damaged at the exit point between the skull and a titanium mesh and the second lead that was damaged at an acute bend over the skull (same patient). Eight of the patients had no complications and underwent an average of 2.7 neurostimulator replacements over 7 consecutive years to date. Each patient underwent routine postoperative computed tomography imaging of the brain, and none had any intracranial hematomas or misplaced leads requiring revision surgery. Finally, there were no deaths in our patient population.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with the NeuroPace RNS System over an average follow-up of 45 months suggests that the surgery and device are safe when placed by an experienced surgeon. Although there were no clinically significant hematomas or patient deaths, we did have 1 patient each with infection and lead damage at the point of exit from the skull. We compare the results of this study with other neuromodulation procedures for epilepsy to evaluate the safety and complications associated with the RNS System. Our initial experience suggests that the RNS System can be readily incorporated into an active epilepsy surgical center.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy; NeuroPace; Neuromodulation; RNS System; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940211     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  11 in total

Review 1.  Seizure detection: do current devices work? And when can they be useful?

Authors:  Xiuhe Zhao; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Clinical neuroprosthetics: Today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Morgan B Lee; Daniel R Kramer; Terrance Peng; Michael F Barbaro; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 3.  Optogenetic Approaches to Target Specific Neural Circuits in Post-stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Michelle Y Cheng; Markus Aswendt; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  A comparison of insertion methods for surgical placement of penetrating neural interfaces.

Authors:  Brianna Thielen; Ellis Meng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Responsive manipulation of neural circuit pathology by fully implantable, front-end multiplexed embedded neuroelectronics.

Authors:  Zifang Zhao; Claudia Cea; Jennifer N Gelinas; Dion Khodagholy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurorecovery and Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael J Young; David J Lin; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.212

7.  Functional Frequency Discrimination From Cortical Somatosensory Stimulation in Humans.

Authors:  Daniel R Kramer; Krista Lamorie-Foote; Michael Barbaro; Morgan Lee; Terrance Peng; Angad Gogia; Charles Y Liu; Spencer S Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  Direct Electrical Stimulation in Electrocorticographic Brain-Computer Interfaces: Enabling Technologies for Input to Cortex.

Authors:  David J Caldwell; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Rajesh P N Rao
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  A Multi-Channel Asynchronous Neurostimulator With Artifact Suppression for Neural Code-Based Stimulations.

Authors:  Sahar Elyahoodayan; Wenxuan Jiang; Huijing Xu; Dong Song
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Advances in neurochemical measurements: A review of biomarkers and devices for the development of closed-loop deep brain stimulation systems.

Authors:  Juan M Rojas Cabrera; J Blair Price; Aaron E Rusheen; Abhinav Goyal; Danielle Jondal; Abhijeet S Barath; Hojin Shin; Su-Youne Chang; Kevin E Bennet; Charles D Blaha; Kendall H Lee; Yoonbae Oh
Journal:  Rev Anal Chem       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.