Literature DB >> 25940067

Incidence and Predictors of Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Abhishek Maan1, Marwan M Refaat1, Edwin Kevin Heist1, Jonathan Passeri1, Ignacio Inglessis1, Leon Ptaszek1, Gus Vlahakes1, Jeremy N Ruskin1, Igor Palacios1, Thoralf Sundt1, Moussa Mansour1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. The development of conduction abnormalities is a major complication in the postprocedural period of TAVR.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the development of postprocedural conduction abnormalities and the requirement of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation in patients undergoing TAVR.
METHODS: Data from 137 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR (Edwards SAPIEN valve, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) between June 2008 and October 2012 were reviewed. Patients with prior history of PPM (n = 27) were excluded. The role of various predictors for pacemaker implantation after TAVR, including the valve index (calculated as [valve size/left ventricular outflow tract diameter] × 100) was investigated.
RESULTS: A total of 31/110 (28.2%) patients required implantation of a PPM after TAVR. The median time to implantation of a PPM was 5 days after the procedure. The development of postprocedural complete heart block was the most common indication for implantation of a PPM (16/31; 51.6%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of preexisting right bundle branch block (RBBB) was found to be a strong predictor of PPM implantation after TAVR (adjusted odds ratio: 4.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.29-18.46, P = 0.020). Using the receiver operated curve analysis, a cut-off value of valve index of 128 was found to be a strong predictor for PPM implantation with a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 61% (c statistic = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the presence of prior RBBB and a valve index of 128 as important risk factors for PPM implantation after TAVR. A larger implanted valve size relative to left ventricular outflow tract diameter leads to a greater compression of the intrinsic conduction system, increasing the need for pacemaker placement. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  permanent pacemaker implantation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940067     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: why is this still happening?

Authors:  Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  A Disruptive Technology: Determining Need for Permanent Pacing After TAVR.

Authors:  Amneet Sandhu; Wendy S Tzou
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Predictors of right ventricular pacing and pacemaker dependence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.

Authors:  Esseim Sharma; Antony F Chu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meer Rabeel Zafar; Syed Farrukh Mustafa; Timothy W Miller; Talal Alkhawlani; Umesh C Sharma
Journal:  Cardiooncology       Date:  2020-07-14

5.  Predictors of conduction recovery after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Derek Q Phan; Jesse Goitia; Ming-Sum Lee; Nigel Gupta; Vicken Aharonian; Prakash Mansukhani; Naing Moore; Somjot S Brar; Ray Zadegan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Gurjit Singh; Marc K Lahiri; Arfaat Khan; Claudio D Schuger
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2017-01-09

7.  Aortic Valve Calcification as a Predictor of Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Pacemaker Dependence.

Authors:  Esseim Sharma; Brian McCauley; Dhairyasheel S Ghosalkar; Michael Atalay; Scott Collins; Anshul Parulkar; Wasiq Sheikh; Malik B Ahmed; Antony Chu
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2020-05-03

8.  Larger Valve Size is Associated with Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Edwards SAPIEN 3™ Transcatheter Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Mansoor Ahmad; Jay N Patel; Minchul Kim; Timir Baman; Marco Barzallo; Sudhir Mungee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-04-02

9.  Quality of life outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients requiring pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Aishwarya Bhardwaj; Tharmathai Ramanan; Abhishek C Sawant; Everett Sinibaldi; Michael Pham; Sahoor Khan; Reema Qureshi; Nikhil Agrawal; Charl Khalil; Rosemary Hansen; Shannon Baldo; Gerald Colern; John Corbelli; Ashish Pershad; Hiroko Beck; Vijay Iyer
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-06-12

10.  A meta-analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Aaqib H Malik; Syed Zaid; Hasan Ahmad; Joshua Goldberg; Tanya Dutta; Cenap Undemir; Martin Cohen; Wilbert S Aronow; Steven L Lansman
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.