Literature DB >> 25940058

In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy.

Jennifer M Racz1, Nicole Look Hong2, Steven Latosinsky1,3.   

Abstract

The absence of a widely accepted method for aesthetic evaluation following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer limits the ability to evaluate cosmetic outcomes. In this study, two different panel scoring approaches were compared in an attempt to identify a gold standard scoring system for subjectively assessing cosmetic outcomes following breast-conserving therapy. Standardized photographs of each participant were evaluated independently by twelve health care professionals involved in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment using the Danoff four-point scale. Individual Danoff scores were combined using two methods, a random sample "three-panel" score and an iterative "Delphi-panel" score, in order to create a final cosmetic score for each patient. Agreement between these two aggregative approaches was assessed with a weighted kappa (wk) statistic. Patient and professional recruitment occurred at two separate tertiary care multi-disciplinary breast health centers. Women with unilateral breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving therapy (segmental mastectomy or lumpectomy and radiotherapy) and were at least 2 years after radiotherapy were asked to participate. Ninety-seven women were evaluated. The Delphi approach required three rounds of evaluation to obtain greater than 50% agreement in all photographs. The wk statistic between scores generated from the "three-panel" and "Delphi-panel" approaches was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.89), thus demonstrating substantial agreement. Evaluation of cosmetic outcomes following breast-conserving therapy using a "three-panel" and "Delphi-panel" score provide similar results, confirming the reliability of either approach for subjective evaluation. Simplicity of use and interpretation favors the "three-panel" score. Future work should concentrate on the integration of the three-panel score with objective and patient-reported scales to generate a comprehensive cosmetic evaluation platform.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi; breast cancer; breast conservation; cosmetic outcome; cosmetic scales; subjective evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940058     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  3 in total

1.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Brigid K Killelea; Theodore N Tsangaris; Meghan Butler; Karen Stavris; Fangyong Li; Xiaopan Yao; Veerle Bossuyt; Malini Harigopal; Donald R Lannin; Lajos Pusztai; Nina R Horowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Quantitative 3-Dimensional Photographic Assessment of Breast Cosmesis After Whole Breast Irradiation for Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bhavana V Chapman; Xiudong Lei; Prithvi Patil; Shikha Tripathi; Krista M Nicklaus; Aaron J Grossberg; Simona F Shaitelman; Alastair M Thompson; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Fatima Merchant; Mia K Markey; Benjamin D Smith; Jay P Reddy
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-21

3.  Cosmesis after early stage breast cancer treatment with surgery and radiation therapy: experience of patients treated in a Chilean radiotherapy centre.

Authors:  Lorena Vargas; Sebastián Solé; Claudio Vicente Solé
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-03-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.