Literature DB >> 25939988

Visual function affects prosocial behaviors in older adults.

Dac A Teoli1, Merideth D Smith2, Monique J Leys3, Priyanka Jain3, J Vernon Odom3.   

Abstract

Eye-related pathological conditions such as glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration commonly lead to decreased peripheral/central field, decreased visual acuity, and increased functional disability. We sought to answer if relationships exist between measures of visual function and reported prosocial behaviors in an older adult population with eye-related diagnoses. The sample consisted of adults, aged ≥ 60 years old, at an academic hospital's eye institute. Vision ranged from normal to severe impairment. Medical charts determined the visual acuities, ocular disease, duration of disease (DD), and visual fields (VF). Measures of giving help were via validated questionnaires on giving formal support (GFS) and giving informal support; measures of help received were perceived support (PS) and informal support received (ISR). ISR had subscales: tangible support (ISR-T), emotional support (ISR-E), and composite (ISR-C). Visual acuities of the better and worse seeing eyes were converted to LogMAR values. VF information converted to a 4-point rating scale of binocular field loss severity. DD was in years. Among 96 participants (mean age 73.28; range 60-94), stepwise regression indicated a relationship of visual variables to GFS (p < 0.05; Multiple R (2) = 0.1679 with acuity-better eye, VF rating, and DD), PS (p < 0.05; Multiple R (2) = 0.2254 with acuity-better eye), ISR-C (p < 0.05; Multiple R (2) = 0.041 with acuity-better eye), and ISR-T (p < 0.05; Multiple R (2) = 0.1421 with acuity-better eye). The findings suggest eye-related conditions can impact levels and perceptions of support exchanges. Our data reinforces the importance of visual function as an influence on prosocial behavior in older adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Age related; Low vision; Prosocial behaviors; Visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939988     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-015-0080-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  46 in total

1.  Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality.

Authors:  Stephanie L Brown; Randolph M Nesse; Amiram D Vinokur; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

2.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

3.  Recovering from spousal bereavement in later life: does volunteer participation play a role?

Authors:  Yunqing Li
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Measuring social support among older adults.

Authors:  N Krause; K Markides
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1990

5.  Depression and anxiety in visually impaired older people.

Authors:  Jennifer R Evans; Astrid E Fletcher; Richard P L Wormald
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Social support as a mediator in the relation between functional status and quality of life in older adults.

Authors:  Jason T Newsom; Richard Schulz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-03

Review 7.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The importance of friendship and family support in adaptation to chronic vision impairment.

Authors:  J P Reinhardt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Proper method for calculating average visual acuity.

Authors:  J T Holladay
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mental stress as consequence and cause of vision loss: the dawn of psychosomatic ophthalmology for preventive and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel; Jiaqi Wang; Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Muneeb Faiq; Christine Heim
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 6.543

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.