Literature DB >> 25939375

Subcutaneous immunization with a novel immunogenic candidate (urease) confers protection against Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis infections.

Morteza Abkar1, Jafar Amani2, Abbas Sahebghadam Lotfi3, Gholamreza Nikbakht Brujeni4, Saeed Alamian5, Mehdi Kamali6.   

Abstract

Brucellosis is a world prevalent endemic illness that is transmitted from domestic animals to humans. Brucella spp. exploits urease for survival in the harsh conditions of stomach during the gastrointestinal infection. In this study, we examined the immune response and the protection elicited by using recombinant Brucella urease (rUrease) vaccination in BALB/c mice. The urease gene was cloned in pET28a and the resulting recombinant protein was employed as subunit vaccine. Recombinant protein was administered subcutaneously and intraperitoneally. Dosage reduction was observed with subcutaneous (SC) vaccination when compared with intraperitoneal (IP) vaccination. rUrease induced mixed Th1-Th2 immune responses with high titers of specific IgG1 and IgG2a. In lymphocyte proliferation assay, splenocytes from IP and SC-vaccinated mice displayed a strong recall proliferative response with high amounts of IL-4, IL-12 and IFN-γ production. Vaccinated mice were challenged with virulent Brucella melitensis, B. abortus and B. suis. The SC vaccination route exhibited a higher degree of protection than IP vaccination (p value ≤ 0.05). Altogether, our results indicated that rUrease could be a useful antigen candidate for the development of subunit vaccines against brucellosis.
© 2015 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucellosis; intraperitoneal; subcutaneous; subunit vaccine; urease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939375     DOI: 10.1111/apm.12400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  7 in total

1.  Survey of Omp19 immunogenicity against Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis: influence of nanoparticulation versus traditional immunization.

Authors:  Morteza Abkar; Abbas Sahebghadam Lotfi; Jafar Amani; Khadijeh Eskandari; Mehdi Fasihi Ramandi; Jafar Salimian; Gholamreza Nikbakht Brujeni; Saeed Alamian; Mehdi Kamali; Hamid Koushki
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines for Brucellosis: Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles-Adsorbed Antigens Induce Cross Protective Response in Mice.

Authors:  Zohre Sadeghi; Mahdi Fasihi-Ramandi; Saeid Bouzari
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-05-29

3.  Meta-Analysis and Advancement of Brucellosis Vaccinology.

Authors:  Tatiane F Carvalho; João Paulo A Haddad; Tatiane A Paixão; Renato L Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Oral immunization of mice with Omp31-loaded N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles induces high protection against Brucella melitensis infection.

Authors:  Morteza Abkar; Mahdi Fasihi-Ramandi; Hamid Kooshki; Abbas Sahebghadam Lotfi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-12-13

Review 5.  Evaluation of Brucellosis Vaccines: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Mohsen Heidary; Shirin Dashtbin; Roya Ghanavati; Marzie Mahdizade Ari; Narjess Bostanghadiri; Atieh Darbandi; Tahereh Navidifar; Malihe Talebi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-18

6.  A review of Brucellosis in Iran: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Control, and Prevention

Authors:  Maryam Golshani; Saeid Buozari
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  Comparison of Immune Effects Between Brucella Recombinant Omp10-Omp28-L7/L12 Proteins Expressed in Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic Systems.

Authors:  Lin Zhu; Qiuju Wang; Yujian Wang; Yulin Xu; Duo Peng; He Huang; Liping Hu; Kai Wei; Ruiliang Zhu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-09-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.