Literature DB >> 25939365

Equivalence of kernel machine regression and kernel distance covariance for multidimensional phenotype association studies.

Wen-Yu Hua1, Debashis Ghosh2.   

Abstract

Associating genetic markers with a multidimensional phenotype is an important yet challenging problem. In this work, we establish the equivalence between two popular methods: kernel-machine regression (KMR), and kernel distance covariance (KDC). KMR is a semiparametric regression framework that models covariate effects parametrically and genetic markers non-parametrically, while KDC represents a class of methods that include distance covariance (DC) and Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC), which are nonparametric tests of independence. We show that the equivalence between the score test of KMR and the KDC statistic under certain conditions can lead to a novel generalization of the KDC test that incorporates covariates. Our contributions are 3-fold: (1) establishing the equivalence between KMR and KDC; (2) showing that the principles of KMR can be applied to the interpretation of KDC; (3) the development of a broader class of KDC statistics, where the class members are statistics corresponding to different kernel combinations. Finally, we perform simulation studies and an analysis of real data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study. The ADNI study suggest that SNPs of FLJ16124 exhibit pairwise interaction effects that are strongly correlated to the changes of brain region volumes.
© 2015, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confounding; Distance covariance; Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion; Neuroimaging genomics; Permutation test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939365     DOI: 10.1111/biom.12314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Adaptive testing for association between two random vectors in moderate to high dimensions.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Xu; Gongjun Xu; Wei Pan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Powerful Genetic Association Analysis for Common or Rare Variants with High-Dimensional Structured Traits.

Authors:  Xiang Zhan; Ni Zhao; Anna Plantinga; Timothy A Thornton; Karen N Conneely; Michael P Epstein; Michael C Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Recent publications from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Reviewing progress toward improved AD clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 21.566

4.  A Statistical Approach for Testing Cross-Phenotype Effects of Rare Variants.

Authors:  K Alaine Broadaway; David J Cutler; Richard Duncan; Jacob L Moore; Erin B Ware; Min A Jhun; Lawrence F Bielak; Wei Zhao; Jennifer A Smith; Patricia A Peyser; Sharon L R Kardia; Debashis Ghosh; Michael P Epstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Leveraging Family History in Case-Control Analyses of Rare Variation.

Authors:  Claudia R Solis-Lemus; S Taylor Fischer; Andrei Todor; Cuining Liu; Elizabeth J Leslie; David J Cutler; Debashis Ghosh; Michael P Epstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sequence Kernel Association Test of Multiple Continuous Phenotypes.

Authors:  Baolin Wu; James S Pankow
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  A fast small-sample kernel independence test for microbiome community-level association analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Zhan; Anna Plantinga; Ni Zhao; Michael C Wu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Generalized reduced rank latent factor regression for high dimensional tensor fields, and neuroimaging-genetic applications.

Authors:  Chenyang Tao; Thomas E Nichols; Xue Hua; Christopher R K Ching; Edmund T Rolls; Paul M Thompson; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Comparison of statistical tests for group differences in brain functional networks.

Authors:  Junghi Kim; Jeffrey R Wozniak; Bryon A Mueller; Xiaotong Shen; Wei Pan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Testing cross-phenotype effects of rare variants in longitudinal studies of complex traits.

Authors:  Pratyaydipta Rudra; K Alaine Broadaway; Erin B Ware; Min A Jhun; Lawrence F Bielak; Wei Zhao; Jennifer A Smith; Patricia A Peyser; Sharon L R Kardia; Michael P Epstein; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.