| Literature DB >> 25938775 |
Charlotte González-Abraham, Exequiel Ezcurra, Pedro P Garcillán, Alfredo Ortega-Rubio, Melanie Kolb, Juan E Bezaury Creel.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25938775 PMCID: PMC4418966 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 3Statistical properties of the ecoregional human footprint.
(a) Relationship between the mean human footprint in each of 24 Mexican ecoregions, and the standard deviation of their footprint values (r = 0.99;P < 0.00001). (b) Relationship between mean human footprint in each ecoregion and the skewness of the distribution of footprint values (r = 0.87; P < 0.00001). (c) Relationship between mean human footprint and the mean patch size of low footprint area in each ecoregion (r = 0.84; P < 0.00001; in all cases the fitted curve was obtained using polynomial regression).
Fig 4Ecoregional footprint nested within biomes.
Large differences in ecoregional HF values (white points) were observed within most biomes (black points). Biomes names as follow Great Plains (GP), Mediterranean California (MC), North American Deserts (NAD), Southern Semi-Arid Highlands (SSAH), Temperate Sierras (TS), Tropical Dry Forests (TDF) and Tropical Humid Forests (THF).