| Literature DB >> 25938580 |
Tanja Strecker1, Romain L Barnard2, Pascal A Niklaus3, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen4, Alexandra Weigelt5, Stefan Scheu1, Nico Eisenhauer5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Loss of biodiversity and increased nutrient inputs are two of the most crucial anthropogenic factors driving ecosystem change. Although both received considerable attention in previous studies, information on their interactive effects on ecosystem functioning is scarce. In particular, little is known on how soil biota and their functions are affected by combined changes in plant diversity and fertilization. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25938580 PMCID: PMC4418810 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Effects of plant diversity and shoot biomass on microbial basal respiration and soil microbial biomass C and N.
Effects of plant species richness on (A) basal respiration and (B) soil microbial biomass C. (C) Relationships between aboveground plant biomass (dry weight) and soil microbial biomass C, and (D) between aboveground plant biomass and soil microbial biomass N. (E) Effects of plant functional group richness on basal respiration. Note log scale of y-axes. Black dots are measures from unfertilized plots, white dots from fertilized plots. Regression lines with 95% confidence bands. Asterisks indicate significant differences (**p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001).
Fertilization and plant community effects on soil microbial properties.
| logBR | logMBCSIR | logqO2 | logMBN | C-to-N ratio | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1, 33 | 4.8 |
| 1, 33 | 16.1 |
| 1, 33 | 3.7 | 0.0621 | 1, 32 | 18 |
| 1, 32 | 7.9 |
|
|
| 1, 32 | 12 |
| 1, 32 | 8.21 |
| 1, 32 | 1.1 | 0.2988 | 1, 32 | 2.5 | 0.122 | 1, 32 | 0 | 0.8984 |
|
| 1, 32 | 6.9 |
| 1, 32 | 3.04 | 0.0906 | 1, 32 | 1.7 | 0.2088 | 1, 32 | 0.6 | 0.458 | 1, 32 | 0.2 | 0.689 |
|
| 1, 32 | 0.5 | 0.4994 | 1, 32 | 0.44 | 0.5133 | 1, 32 | 2.7 | 0.1116 | 1, 32 | 3.1 | 0.087 | 1, 32 |
|
|
|
| 1, 32 | 7.4 |
| 1, 32 | 1.56 | 0.2203 | 1, 32 | 4 |
| 1, 32 | 0.3 | 0.601 | 1, 32 |
|
|
|
| 1, 32 | 0.3 | 0.5856 | 1, 32 | <0.01 | 0.9706 | 1, 32 | 0.4 | 0.5182 | 1, 32 | 1.5 | 0.238 | 1, 32 | 0.2 | 0.6669 |
|
| 1, 32 | 9 |
| 1, 32 | 7.43 |
| 1, 32 | 0.4 | 0.5416 | 1, 32 | 1.9 | 0.179 | 1, 32 | 0.2 | 0.643 |
|
| 32, 33 | 1 | 0.4781 | 32, 33 | 2.36 |
| 32, 33 | 1 | 0.4507 | 32, 32 | 5.8 |
| 32, 32 | 6.1 |
|
|
| 1, 32 | 25 |
| 1, 32 | 0.22 | 0.6418 | 1, 32 | 45 |
| 1, 32 | 0 | 0.943 | 1, 32 | 0.4 | 0.5202 |
|
| 1, 32 | 2.7 | 0.1073 | 1, 32 | 2.62 | 0.1152 | 1, 32 | 0.7 | 0.3947 | 1, 32 | 2.2 | 0.144 | 1, 32 | 0 | 0.9049 |
|
| 1, 32 | 2.8 | 0.1068 | 1, 32 | 0.53 | 0.4738 | 1, 32 | 2.4 | 0.1283 | 1, 32 | 1.5 | 0.237 | 1, 32 | 0.1 | 0.8107 |
|
| 1, 32 | 2.1 | 0.1545 | 1, 32 | <0.01 | 0.9568 | 1, 32 | 3.3 | 0.0773 | 1, 32 | 0 | 0.892 | 1, 32 | 2.1 | 0.1619 |
|
| 1, 32 | 5 |
| 1, 32 | 0.01 | 0.9343 | 1, 32 |
|
| 1, 32 | 0.8 | 0.394 | 1, 32 | 0.1 | 0.7176 |
|
| 1, 32 | 0.1 | 0.7453 | 1, 32 | 0.07 | 0.7912 | 1, 32 | 0 | 0.8335 | 1, 32 | 0.2 | 0.656 | 1, 32 | 0.3 | 0.5655 |
|
| 1, 32 | 0.3 | 0.5753 | 1, 32 | 0.1 | 0.7579 | 1, 32 | 0.2 | 0.6323 | 1, 32 | 0.1 | 0.727 | 1, 32 | 0.4 | 0.5201 |
|
| 33 | 33 | 33 | 32 | 32 | ||||||||||
|
| 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | ||||||||||
|
| 2.24 | 3.49 | 2.22 | 7.48 | 6.43 | ||||||||||
GLM (type I sum of squares) table of F-values for effects of block, plot, fertilization (FERT), log-transformed plant species richness(logSR), plant functional group richness (FR), presence of grasses (GR), legumes (LEG), small herbs (SH) or tall herbs (TH) and the respective interactions between fertilization and plant community properties on log-transformed data of microbial basal respiration (logBR), microbial biomass C (logMBCSIR), microbial specific respiration (logqO2), and microbial biomass N (log MBN) and un-transformed microbial C-to-N ratio. F-values refer to those where the respective factor was fitted first within its category (plant diversity or presence of plant functional groups). d.f. = degrees of freedom; F = F-value; P = p-value.
↑ / ↓ = increase/decrease with increasing diversity level or in presence of the respective plant functional group or treatment. Significant effects (P≤0.05) are given in bold.
Fig 2Interactive effects of the presence of legumes and fertilization on microbial basal respiration and specific respiration, and correlation between microbial C-to-N ratio and microbial specific respiration in fertilized and unfertilized plots.
(A) Interactive effects of the presence of legumes and fertilization on soil microbial basal respiration and (B) specific respiration. Means with standard error bars. Different letters indicate significant differences (*p≤0.05; **p≤0.01). (C) Regressions between soil microbial C-to-N (C:N) ratio and specific respiration in unfertilized plots (black line, black dots) and fertilized plots (dashed line, white dots) with coefficients of determination and p-values of slopes.
Fig 3Effects of plant functional groups on microbial properties.
Effects of (A) legumes and (B) grasses on microbial C-to-N (C:N) ratio. Effects of small herbs on (C) basal respiration and (D) soil microbial biomass C. Asterisks indicate significant differences (*p≤0.05, **p≤0.01). Means with standard error bars.