| Literature DB >> 25938505 |
Jong Hyuk Lee1, Chang Min Park2, Sang Joon Park2, Jae Seok Bae1, Sang Min Lee1, Jin Mo Goo2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the added value of quantitative 3D shape analysis in differentiating encapsulated from invasive thymomas.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25938505 PMCID: PMC4418613 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 13D shape analysis software program.
Each thymoma was manually segmented from surrounding structures on all CT images and their 3D shape features were automatically calculated using an in-house developed software program.
Univariate analysis of clinical and CT features of encapsulated and invasive thymomas.
| Variable | Encapsulated thymomas | Invasive thymomas | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 52.0 ± 12.7 | 55.3 ± 13.6 | 0.368 |
| Presence of symptoms | 2 | 9 | 0.089 |
| Presence of myasthenia gravis | 4 | 7 | 0.738 |
| Presence of cystic change | 3 | 16 | 0.004 |
| Presence of calcification | 4 | 7 | 0.738 |
| Diameter (cm) | 4.9 ± 1.7 (range, 2.1–7.8) | 4.2 ± 1.8 (range, 1.7–9.1) | 0.187 |
| WHO | A (n = 1) | A (n = 2) | 0.325 |
| classification | AB (n = 7) | AB (n = 3) | |
| B1 (n = 10) | B1 (n = 12) | ||
| B2 (n = 3) | B2 (n = 8) | ||
| B3 (n = 2) | B3 (n = 5) |
Note—Data are numbers or mean ± standard deviation of each variable.
Univariate analysis of 3D shape features of encapsulated and invasive thymomas.
| Variable | Encapsulated thymomas | Invasive thymomas | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log_Volume | 1.631 ± 0.529 (range, 0.879–3.201) | 1.335 ± 0.604 (range, 0.402–3.076) | 0.530 |
| Surface area (cm2) | 89.989 ± 59.312 (range, 25.773–248.384) | 83.552 ± 86.609 (range, 11.469–452.633) | 0.761 |
| Sphericity | 0.677 ± 0.106 (range, 0.48–0.81) | 0.604 ± 0.104 (range, 0.434–0.795) | 0.016 |
| Discrete compactness | 0.825 ± 0.106 (range, 0.472–0.928) | 0.691 ± 0.160 (range, 0.37–0.900) | 0.001 |
| Roundness | 0.699 ± 0.068 (range, 0.546–0.811) | 0.685 ± 0.074 (range, 0.569–0.818) | 0.486 |
Note—Data are mean ± standard deviation.
Fig 2CT images of encapsulated and invasive thymomas.
(a) A 61 year old female who underwent surgical resection of an encapsulated thymoma (arrow) (discrete compactness, 0.925; sphericity, 0.703). (b) A 40 year old female who underwent surgical resection of an invasive thymoma (arrow) (discrete compactness, 0.722; sphericity, 0.646). Note that although these two kinds of thymomas cannot be easily differentiated grossly owing to similar CT features, there is a distinct difference in 3D shape features, particularly in discrete compactness, between the encapsulated thymoma and invasive thymoma.
Binary logistic regression analysis in differentiating encapsulated from invasive thymomas.
| Models | Significant features | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical and CT features, alone | Cystic change | 7.619 | 1.861–31.196 | 0.005 |
| 3D shape features, alone | Discrete compactness | 92.110 | 3.828–2216.460 | 0.005 |
| Clinical and CT features + 3D shape features | Cystic change | 6.636 | 1.452–30.335 | 0.015 |
| Discrete compactness | 77.775 | 2.595–2331.333 | 0.012 |
†OR = odds ratio
††CI = confidence interval
Fig 3ROC plot of binary logistic regression analysis with backward stepwise selection, using leave-one-out cross-validation method.
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of binary logistic regression models, using leave-one-out cross-validation method, in differentiating encapsulated from invasive thymomas. The graph shows that the combination of 3D shape analysis and CT features (blue line, AUC, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.935–0.975) has significantly higher discriminating performance in differentiating encapsulated from invasive thymomas compared to clinical and CT features (red line, AUC, 0.666; 95% CI, 0.626–0.707) (difference between AUC values, 0.289; p<0.001). For reference, ROC analysis with 3D shape analysis alone is also demonstrated (green line, AUC, 0.896; 95% CI,0.868–0.923).
Interobserver variability of shape features of thymomas.
| Variables | ICC | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log_Volume | 0.994 | 0.983–0.998 | <0.001 |
| Surface area (cm2) | 0.984 | 0.955–0.994 | <0.001 |
| Sphericity | 0.936 | 0.816–0.978 | <0.001 |
| Discrete compactness | 0.969 | 0.911–0.989 | <0.001 |
| Roundness | 0.992 | 0.978–0.997 | <0.001 |
Note—ICCs of less than 0.40 signifies poor agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, good agreement; and 0.81 or greater, excellent agreement.
†ICC = intraclass correlation coefficients.
††CI = confidence interval