Literature DB >> 25938474

Real-world outcomes of paliperidone palmitate compared to daily oral antipsychotic therapy in schizophrenia: a randomized, open-label, review board-blinded 15-month study.

Larry Alphs1, Carmela Benson, Kimberly Cheshire-Kinney, Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer, Lian Mao, Stephen C Rodriguez, H Lynn Starr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Paliperidone Palmitate Research in Demonstrating Effectiveness (PRIDE) study compared the effects of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate with daily oral antipsychotics on treatment failure in adults with schizophrenia.
METHOD: The PRIDE study is a 15-month, randomized, multicenter study (May 5, 2010, to December 9, 2013) of adult subjects with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia and a history of incarceration. Subjects were randomly assigned to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate injections or daily oral antipsychotics (randomly assigned from 7 acceptable, prespecified oral antipsychotics) for 15 months. The primary end point was time to first treatment failure, defined as arrest/incarceration; psychiatric hospitalization; suicide; treatment discontinuation or supplementation due to inadequate efficacy, safety, or tolerability; or increased psychiatric services to prevent hospitalization. Time to first treatment failure was determined by a blinded event-monitoring board and analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: In this study, 450 patients were randomly assigned, and 444 were included in the intent-to-treat population. Paliperidone palmitate was associated with significant delay in time to first treatment failure versus oral antipsychotics (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.09-1.88; log rank P = .011). Observed treatment failure rates over 15 months were 39.8% and 53.7%, respectively. Arrest/incarceration and psychiatric hospitalization were the most common reasons for treatment failure in the paliperidone palmitate and oral antipsychotic groups (21.2% vs 29.4% and 8.0% vs 11.9%, respectively). The 5 most common treatment-emergent adverse events for the paliperidone palmitate treatment group were injection site pain (18.6% of subjects), insomnia (16.8%), weight increased (11.9%), akathisia (11.1%), and anxiety (10.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: In a trial designed to reflect real-world management of schizophrenia, once-monthly paliperidone palmitate demonstrated superiority compared to oral antipsychotics in delaying time to treatment failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01157351. © Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25938474     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.14m09584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  33 in total

1. 

Authors:  Japheth Bool; Alex Crawley; Annabelle Wanson; Breanna Davis; Katelyn Halpape
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Pharmacotherapy management of schizophrenia for family physicians.

Authors:  Japheth Bool; Alex Crawley; Annabelle Wanson; Breanna Davis; Katelyn Halpape
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A Reasonable Alternative to Clozapine in the Chronically Relapsing Smoking Patient? A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  John R Tomko; Nadeem Ahmed; Cynthia Kuntz; Justine Zick
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-11

Review 4.  Long-Acting Injectable Paliperidone Palmitate: A Review of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Matthew T Morris; Sandip P Tarpada
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2017-05-15

5.  Cross-Sectional Study of Homeless High Service Utilizers in Los Angeles County Jails: Race, Marginalization and Opportunities for Diversion.

Authors:  Sonya Shadravan; Dustin Stephens; Oona Appel; Kristen Ochoa
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 6.  Barriers to the Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in the Management of Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Eduard Parellada; Miquel Bioque
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Taishiro Kishimoto; Katsuhiko Hagi; Masahiro Nitta; Stefan Leucht; Mark Olfson; John M Kane; Christoph U Correll
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Real-World Evidence of the Clinical and Economic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics Among Patients with Schizophrenia in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dee Lin; Philippe Thompson-Leduc; Isabelle Ghelerter; Ha Nguyen; Marie-Hélène Lafeuille; Carmela Benson; Panagiotis Mavros; Patrick Lefebvre
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Use in Patients with Schizophrenia and Criminal Justice System Encounters.

Authors:  Madhav P Bhatta; Saroj Bista; Antoine C El Khoury; Eric G Hutzell; Neeta Tandon; Douglas Smith
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-05-19

10.  Evidence-Based Expert Consensus Regarding Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia from the Taiwanese Society of Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology (TSBPN).

Authors:  Kai-Chun Yang; Yin-To Liao; Yen-Kuang Yang; Shih-Ku Lin; Chih-Sung Liang; Ya-Mei Bai
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.