Literature DB >> 25938348

The effect of dabigatran on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in vitro and ex vivo samples.

Roslyn Bonar1, Emmanuel J Favaloro, Soma Mohammed, Leonardo Pasalic, John Sioufi, Katherine Marsden.   

Abstract

The new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban provide alternatives to warfarin for treatment and prevention of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in various settings. These have been developed as not requiring laboratory monitoring; however, under certain clinical situations, including recent haemorrhage/thrombosis, emergency surgical procedures, testing may be indicated.The aim of this study was to assess findings of haemostasis laboratory tests for one of the DOACs, dabigatran (Pradaxa), tested across a wide range of laboratory assays.Laboratories (n = 72) enrolled in the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) Haematology program were sent set(s) of seven dabigatran spiked plasma samples covering the concentration 0-800 ng/mL. Also, 30 ex vivo patient samples under therapy with dabigatran were assessed.Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time assays showed some sensitivity to dabigatran; however, a normal result could not inform on drug exclusion. The thrombin time (TT) was very sensitive to dabigatran, and a normal TT could generally be used for drug exclusion. More specialised assays such as the Hemoclot, a direct thrombin inhibition assay, and in-house dilute TT methods, showed good reproducibility and concordance with expected drug levels assessed by mass spectrometry and were effective to quantify drug levels. Dabigatran also affected factor assays, lupus anticoagulant and factor inhibitor measurement, leading to potential misinterpretation of test results. Ex vivo sample testing provided similar and extended information.Dabigatran affects many haemostasis tests. Some can be used to predict the presence, absence or quantity of dabigatran in patient plasma. For others, interference may lead to false conclusions regarding patients' haemostatic status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25938348     DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  8 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker; Deborah M Siegal; Mark Crowther; David A Garcia
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Interference of direct oral anticoagulants in haemostasis assays: high potential for diagnostic false positives and false negatives.

Authors:  Emmanuel J Favaloro; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) interference in hemostasis assays.

Authors:  Karen A Moser; Kristi J Smock
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 4.  Laboratory measurement of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: selecting the optimal assay based on drug, assay availability, and clinical indication.

Authors:  Adam Cuker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Measurement and reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 6.  Inherited Thrombophilia in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Lina Khider; Nicolas Gendron; Laetitia Mauge
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Lupus anticoagulant testing during anticoagulation, including direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Emmanuel J Favaloro; Leonardo Pasalic
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-03-15

8.  Inhibition of thrombin generation 12 hours after intake of direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Michael Metze; Christian Pfrepper; Tristan Klöter; Stephan Stöbe; Roland Siegemund; Thomas Siegemund; Elvira Edel; Ulrich Laufs; Sirak Petros
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.