Literature DB >> 25938300

What does a professionalism assessment scale measure?

Pieter C Barnhoorn1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25938300      PMCID: PMC4426204          DOI: 10.5116/ijme.5539.e386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Educ        ISSN: 2042-6372


× No keyword cloud information.
Klemenc-Ketis and Vrecko described the development and validation of a professionalism assessment scale for medical students in a recent issue of this journal. In the introduction to this article they state that 'professionalism can be defined as a collection of attitudes, values, behaviours and relationships that act as the foundation of the health professional's contract with society'. Subsequently, the authors describe how they have developed a professionalism assessment scale for medical students. They used input from teachers as well as from students, because they argue that it is important to incorporate students' opinions about professionalism into research in this field. The engagement of students in the study of professionalism is of great importance. The experts on professionalism do not have a monopoly on wisdom. However, there is someone who knows best, what is, meant by professionalism, namely, the patient. Professionalism can be defined as 'placing the best interests of patients at the centre of everything you do'. The patient is the sole reason for the existence of us doctors! In addition to incorporating students' opinions about professionalism it is necessary to incorporate patients' opinions on assessment scales in further research. Furthermore, it is important to ask ourselves what we are measuring when we claim to measure professionalism. The items of the professionalism assessment scale measure beliefs about professionalism. The question is whether beliefs about professionalism are synonymous with professionalism. Beliefs drive behaviour. However, the actual demonstrated behaviour not only depends on beliefs but on other factors, such as the environment and on students' competencies. A helpful model, which can be used to differentiate between these levels, may be the onion model described by Korthagen. This model consists, of the following layers, from the outside to the inside: environment, behaviour, competencies, beliefs, identity and, at the centre mission. It can serve as a framework for reflection and development. The levels in this model can be seen from different perspectives. From each perspective, there will be a differet answer to the question of the essential qualities of a professional doctor, while it is also possible to employ various perspectives parallel to one another. Many a medical student values, for instance the empathy items, described by Klemenc-Ketis and Vrecko, but does that imply that they can behave empathetically in a stressful environment? Incorporating patients opinions and differentiation between levels of professionalism might take this valuable research on professionalism assessment scale measure to a higher level.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
  2 in total

1.  Refining a definition of medical professionalism.

Authors:  Pieter C Barnhoorn; Callum Youngson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Development and validation of a professionalism assessment scale for medical students.

Authors:  Zalika Klemenc-Ketis; Helena Vrecko
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2014-11-09
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Causes and characteristics of medical student referrals to a professional behaviour board.

Authors:  Pieter C Barnhoorn; Jan H Bolk; Marleen W Ottenhoff-de Jonge; Walther N K A van Mook; Arnout Jan de Beaufort
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-15

2.  Attitudes toward professionalism in medical students and its associations with personal characteristics and values: what actually makes a difference? [Response to Letter].

Authors:  Polona Selic; Anja Cerne; Zalika Klemenc-Ketis; Davorina Petek; Igor Svab
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-08-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.