Literature DB >> 25938252

Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.

Sabine Born1, Dirk Kerzel1, Jay Pratt2.   

Abstract

The contingent attentional capture hypothesis proposes that visual stimuli that do not possess characteristics relevant for the current task will not capture attention, irrespective of their bottom-up saliency. Typically, contingent capture is tested in a spatial cuing paradigm, comparing manual reaction times (RTs) across different conditions. However, attention may act through several mechanisms and RTs may not be ideal to disentangle those different components. In 3 experiments, we examined whether color singleton cues provoke cuing effects in temporal order judgments (TOJs) and whether they would be contingent on attentional control sets. Experiment 1 showed that color singleton cues indeed produce cuing effects in TOJs, even in a cluttered and dynamic target display containing multiple heterogeneous distractors. In Experiment 2, consistent with contingent capture, we observed reliable cuing effects only when the singleton cue matched participants' current attentional control set. Experiment 3 suggests that a sensory interaction account of the differences found in Experiment 2 is unlikely. Our results help to discern the attentional components that may play a role in contingent capture. Further, we discuss a number of other effects (e.g., reversed cuing effects) that are found in RTs, but so far have not been reported in TOJs. Those differences suggest that RTs are influenced by a multitude of mechanisms; however, not all of these mechanisms may affect TOJs. We conclude by highlighting how the study of attentional capture in TOJs provides valuable insights for the attention literature, but also for studies concerned with the perceived timing between stimuli. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25938252     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  The illusion of control: Sequential dependencies underlie contingent attentional capture.

Authors:  Greg Huffman; Victoria M Antinucci; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

3.  Investigating attentional control sets: Evidence for the compilation of multi-feature control sets.

Authors:  Simon Merz; Frank Beege; Lars-Michael Schöpper; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking.

Authors:  Katherine S Moore; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Ariel Kershner; Korissa Belville; Jaimie Jasina; Aziza Ransome; Jessica Avanzato
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.355

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.