Literature DB >> 25938248

Situation model updating in young and older adults: Global versus incremental mechanisms.

Heather R Bailey1, Jeffrey M Zacks1.   

Abstract

Readers construct mental models of situations described by text. Activity in narrative text is dynamic, so readers must frequently update their situation models when dimensions of the situation change. Updating can be incremental, such that a change leads to updating just the dimension that changed, or global, such that the entire model is updated. Here, we asked whether older and young adults make differential use of incremental and global updating. Participants read narratives containing changes in characters and spatial location and responded to recognition probes throughout the texts. Responses were slower when probes followed a change, suggesting that situation models were updated at changes. When either dimension changed, responses to probes for both dimensions were slowed; this provides evidence for global updating. Moreover, older adults showed stronger evidence of global updating than did young adults. One possibility is that older adults perform more global updating to offset reduced ability to manipulate information in working memory. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25938248      PMCID: PMC4451381          DOI: 10.1037/a0039081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  22 in total

1.  Situation models and aging.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; J M Curiel; R A Zwaan; D E Copeland
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-03

2.  Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models.

Authors:  G H Bower; M Rinck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Temporal and spatial distance in situation models.

Authors:  M Rinck; G H Bower
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

4.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Aging and the representation of spatial situations in narrative understanding.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Daniel G Morrow; Richard Leno
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Age differences in rereading.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Danielle D Gagne; Daniel G Morrow; Barbara Herman DeWall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

Review 7.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; G A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Aging, parafoveal preview, and semantic integration in sentence processing: testing the cognitive workload of wrap-up.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-01-09

9.  Who when where: an experimental test of the event-indexing model.

Authors:  Mike Rinck; Ulrike Weber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

10.  Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment.

Authors:  R Katzman; T Brown; P Fuld; A Peck; R Schechter; H Schimmel
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  9 in total

1.  Does semantic knowledge influence event segmentation and recall of text?

Authors:  Kimberly M Newberry; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

2.  Event Boundaries in Memory and Cognition.

Authors:  Gabriel A Radvansky; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-09-21

3.  Semantic knowledge attenuates age-related differences in event segmentation and episodic memory.

Authors:  Barbara L Pitts; Maverick E Smith; Kimberly M Newberry; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 4.  Constructing Experience: Event Models from Perception to Action.

Authors:  Lauren L Richmond; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading.

Authors:  Heather R Bailey; Christopher A Kurby; Jesse Q Sargent; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

6.  Filling the gap despite full attention: the role of fast backward inferences for event completion.

Authors:  Frank Papenmeier; Alisa Brockhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-01-28

7.  Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Irene P Kan; Kendra L Pizzonia; Anna B Drummey; Eli J V Mikkelsen
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-11-27

8.  Neural Evidence for Representational Persistence Within Events.

Authors:  Youssef Ezzyat; Lila Davachi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  On the predictability of event boundaries in discourse: An ERP investigation.

Authors:  Francesca Delogu; Heiner Drenhaus; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.