| Literature DB >> 25937913 |
Ruihe Gao1, Juan Shi1, Ruifen Huang1, Zhuang Wang1, Youqing Luo1.
Abstract
Pine wilt disease (PWD) has caused significant Masson pine mortality in the Three Gorges reservoir region in central China. In this study, five uniform Masson pine stand types infected by PWD were selected and surveyed on slopes and aspects with similar environmental conditions. In sites that had been infected, soil bulk density was reduced, and the difference among the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05) at the 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm soil layers, but not at 20-40 cm. Other soil water-related physical properties, excluding noncapillary porosity, significantly differed among the groups in all soil layers. Additionally, the values of available phosphorus, sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium were higher in the invaded stands, but the total nitrogen and organic matter contents were lower. Masson pine does not become reestablished following PWD-induced mortality but is instead replaced by broad-leaved tree species. Among the 19 examined environmental variables, five were found to be significantly related with the ordination of plant community structure: Masson pine stumps (MPS), K(+), capillary water holding capacity (CWHC), capillary porosity (CP), and soil water content (SWC). Among these factors, the plant community structure was principally related to MPS and K(+). The findings of this study show that the outbreak of PWD has impacted Masson pine forest soil properties and altered forest community composition. The disease is negatively related with the presence of Masson pine and positively associated with that of broad-leaved tree species.Entities:
Keywords: Bursaphelenchus xylophilus; Masson pine; invasive alien species; pine wilt disease; soil property; three Gorges reservoir region
Year: 2015 PMID: 25937913 PMCID: PMC4409418 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Pine sawyer beetle (Monochamus alternatus Hope) is one of the most important vector of pine wood nematode in China.
Figure 2Current distribution of pine wilt disease throughout the southeastern provinces of China (2013). (Data obtained from the No.2 bulletin of State Forestry Administration in 2014—The epidemic area of Pine Wilt Disease. www.forestry.gov.cn/main/3600/content-657977.html).
Figure 3The location of Yiling District (study areas), Hubei province, P.R. China. (A) Current distribution of pine wilt disease throughout the counties in the Three Gorges reservoir regions (2013); (B) Current distribution of pine wilt disease areas in Yiling District. (Data obtained from the Station of Pest and Disease Control and Quarantine of Yiling District, Hubei province, P.R. China).
Stand characteristics of five Masson pine forest sites infected by pine wood nematode
| Stand | ST1 | ST2 | ST3 | ST4 | ST5 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
| Other spp. | Total |
| Other spp. | Total |
| Other spp. | Total |
| Other spp. | Total |
| Other spp. | |
| Number of stems (tree ha−1) | 1836 ± 205.51 | 1303 ± 174.62 | 533 ± 65.11 | 1489 ± 226.90 | 933 ± 171.05 | 556 ± 117.06 | 1304 ± 289.17 | 704 ± 243.77 | 600 ± 155.56 | 1263 ± 281.38 | 537 ± 162.49 | 726 ± 145.01 | 1141 ± 150.03 | 348 ± 203.77 | 793 ± 72.86 |
| Mean DBH | 9.22 ± 1.26 | 10.79 ± 1.41 | 4.16 ± 0.42 | 9.63 ± 1.21 | 12.58 ± 1.77 | 4.67 ± 0.12 | 10.51 ± 0.72 | 13.83 ± 0.42 | 6.62 ± 1.28 | 9.95 ± 2.25 | 15.03 ± 2.53 | 6.18 ± 2.10 | 15.43 ± 0.97 | 21.24 ± 1.99 | 12.17 ± 0.93 |
| Basal area (m2/ha) | 16.29 ± 2.41 | 15.54 ± 2.62 | 0.75 ± 0.47 | 14.65 ± 1.18 | 13.57 ± 1.34 | 1.09 ± 0.16 | 14.96 ± 3.93 | 12.38 ± 4.65 | 2.58 ± 0.74 | 14.92 ± 7.36 | 11.96 ± 4.73 | 2.96 ± 0.92 | 21.78 ± 4.45 | 13.09 ± 5.53 | 8.69 ± 1.24 |
| Soil texture (sand:silt:clay) | Loamy sand (87:5:8) | Loamy sand (84:5:11) | Loamy sand (84:6:10) | Loamy sand (83:8:9) | Loamy sand (80:9:11) | ||||||||||
| Masson pine stumps (100 m2) | 0 | 2.67 | 4.33 | 6.67 | 8.5 | ||||||||||
| Elevation (m) | 141.00 ± 41.39 | 211.67 ± 71.32 | 214.33 ± 83.20 | 232.67 ± 77.89 | 223.33 ± 41.79 | ||||||||||
| Slope (°) | 24.00 ± 2.65 | 18.33 ± 4.16 | 23.32 ± 7.76 | 21.00 ± 5.57 | 17.33 ± 4.51 | ||||||||||
DBH, diameter at breast height.
Soil water-related physical properties after different periods of infection by pine wood nematode
| Soil layer (cm) | Stand type | Bulk density (g/cm3) | Maximum water holding capacity (%) | Capillary water holding capacity (%) | Noncapillary porosity (%) | Capillary porosity (%) | Total soil porosity (%) | Soil water content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–10 cm | ST1 | 1.50 ± 0.10a | 25.25 ± 2.68a | 20.17 ± 1.48a | 3.42 ± 1.52a | 13.53 ± 1.51a | 16.95 ± 2.44a | 14.19 ± 2.57a |
| ST2 | 1.49 ± 0.022a | 30.13 ± 3.34ab | 24.90 ± 2.10a | 3.49 ± 1.64a | 16.61 ± 1.66ab | 20.10 ± 2.46ab | 16.66 ± 1.49a | |
| ST3 | 1.33 ± 0.185b | 32.85 ± 5.81b | 24.97 ± 3.50a | 6.88 ± 2.58 | 19.57 ± 4.60b | 26.46 ± 7.15bc | 14.09 ± 3.36a | |
| ST4 | 1.28 ± 0.093b | 40.27 ± 7.49c | 34.84 ± 7.36b | 4.29 ± 3.02a | 27.67 ± 7.58c | 31.96 ± 8.26c | 29.63 ± 9.74b | |
| ST5 | 1.39 ± 0.122ab | 33.38 ± 4.27b | 23.85 ± 2.98a | 6.98 ± 4.13a | 17.31 ± 3.28ab | 24.29 ± 4.97b | 17.75 ± 2.75a | |
| 4.247 | 7.103 | 10.852 | 2.508 | 9.064 | 6.442 | 10.155 | ||
| 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.068 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | ||
| 10–20 cm | ST1 | 1.61 ± 0.078a | 25.31 ± 3.82a | 21.32 ± 3.66a | 2.50 ± 1.64a | 13.38 ± 2.86a | 15.88 ± 3.08a | 16.39 ± 3.93a |
| ST2 | 1.43 ± 0.102ab | 30.89 ± 4.26ab | 23.88 ± 1.76ab | 5.06 ± 3.43a | 16.85 ± 2.21ac | 21.91 ± 4.75ab | 16.72 ± 2.54a | |
| ST3 | 1.49 ± 0.156ab | 27.52 ± 5.19a | 20.91 ± 4.38a | 4.56 ± 2.24a | 14.29 ± 4.38a | 18.85 ± 5.64ab | 14.36 ± 3.66a | |
| ST4 | 1.37 ± 0.126b | 36.64 ± 6.94b | 34.56 ± 7.13c | 3.45 ± 0.60a | 25.74 ± 7.17bc | 27.19 ± 7.22a | 30.92 ± 8.42b | |
| ST5 | 1.42 ± 0.074b | 34.26 ± 4.14b | 29.31 ± 5.78bc | 3.47 ± 1.99a | 20.77 ± 4.87c | 24.24 ± 4.04a | 24.21 ± 6.35c | |
| 3.935 | 5.523 | 8.539 | 2.755 | 7.253 | 4.394 | 11.232 | ||
| 0.013 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.000 | ||
| 20–40 cm | ST1 | 1.55 ± 0.071a | 28.05 ± 4.11a | 22.24 ± 5.78a | 3.79 ± 3.04a | 14.4 ± 3.99a | 18.19 ± 3.24a | 18.35 ± 5.51a |
| ST2 | 1.43 ± 0.023a | 28.33 ± 1.05a | 21.38 ± 3.32a | 4.89 ± 2.69a | 14.93 ± 2.20a | 19.82 ± 1.06a | 17.72 ± 2.76a | |
| ST3 | 1.52 ± 0.243a | 28.81 ± 7.92a | 23.13 ± 6.58a | 4.01 ± 2.55a | 16.04 ± 6.08a | 20.05 ± 7.97a | 14.70 ± 5.30a | |
| ST4 | 1.37 ± 0.107a | 37.01 ± 5.45b | 33.77 ± 3.03b | 2.53 ± 3.64a | 24.83 ± 3.29b | 27.36 ± 6.15b | 30.52 ± 3.73b | |
| ST5 | 1.37 ± 0.076a | 35.53 ± 4.34b | 31.81 ± 3.65b | 2.75 ± 0.90a | 23.37 ± 3.47b | 26.12 ± 4.13b | 26.41 ± 1.79b | |
| 2.538 | 4.398 | 9.325 | 0.747 | 9.065 | 3.966 | 17.609 | ||
| 0.065 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.569 | 0.000 | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Values are mean ± SD. For each column, values with different letters are significantly different at P = 0.05.
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01.
Soil chemical properties after different periods of infection by pine wood nematode
| Stand type | Total | Organic matter (%) | Soil pH (5:1) | Available P (mg/kg) | K+ (mg/kg) | Na+ (mg/kg) | Ca2+ (mg/kg) | Mg2+ (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST 1 | ||||||||
| Mean | 0.13 ± 0.031a | 2.53 ± 0.427a | 5.15 ± 0.375a | 17.92 ± 0.699a | 163.11 ± 39.138a | 48.95 ± 7.641a | 1695.96 ± 820.095a | 21.71 ± 3.646a |
| Range | 0.11–0.16 | 2.25–3.02 | 4.78–5.53 | 17.52–18.73 | 117.97–187.52 | 41.74–56.96 | 773.53–2342.65 | 17.59–23.04 |
| ST 2 | ||||||||
| Mean | 0.12 ± 0.004a | 2.67 ± 0.332a | 5.31 ± 0.112a | 15.34 ± 3.352a | 178.89 ± 0.944ab | 52.8 ± 5.119a | 1487.69 ± 550.722a | 22.01 ± 0.577a |
| Range | 0.11–0.13 | 2.28–2.89 | 5.22–5.43 | 11.48–17.52 | 178.28–179.98 | 47.4–57.58 | 1081.62–2114.55 | 21.41–22.56 |
| ST 3 | ||||||||
| Mean | 0.14 ± 0.059a | 4.08 ± 1.827a | 5.80 ± 0.958a | 18.73 ± 5.539a | 173.42 ± 30.609ab | 44.86 ± 3.373a | 1903.18 ± 618.018a | 23.14 ± 1.141a |
| Range | 0.11–0.21 | 2.66–6.14 | 5.08–6.89 | 13.89–24.77 | 142.02–203.17 | 42.41–48.71 | 1208.82–2574.26 | 22.07–24.34 |
| ST 4 | ||||||||
| Mean | 0.09 ± 0.016a | 2.39 ± 0.530a | 5.46 ± 0.285a | 15.91 ± 3.045a | 192.93 ± 9.793ab | 57.29 ± 7.740a | 2536.77 ± 802.410a | 23.27 ± 0.569a |
| Range | 0.07–0.10 | 1.93–2.97 | 5.17–5.74 | 12.68–18.73 | 183.74–203.23 | 48.84–64.04 | 1627.21–3144.49 | 22.83–23.91 |
| ST 5 | ||||||||
| Mean | 0.12 ± 0.014a | 2.45 ± 0.544a | 5.14 ± 0.185a | 18.02 ± 0.699a | 209.41 ± 22.058b | 73.45 ± 41.151a | 2129.29 ± 674.501a | 23.86 ± 1.105a |
| Range | 0.11–0.13 | 1.83–2.86 | 4.96–5.33 | 17.52–18.93 | 185.97–229.76 | 48.08–120.93 | 1682.35–2905.15 | 22.65–24.82 |
| 1.198 | 1.789 | 0.950 | 0.611 | 1.596 | 0.991 | 0.969 | 0.739 | |
| 0.37 | 0.208 | 0.475 | 0.644 | 0.25 | 0.456 | 0.466 | 0.586 | |
Values are mean ± SD. For each column, values with different letters are significantly different at P = 0.05.
Important tree species with importance value (IV) over 0.50 in Masson pine forest
| Species | Number of individuals | Number of plots | Total basal area (m2) | DBH (cm) | Height (m) | Crown breadth (m2) | Importance value (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1187 | 15 | 22.82 | 12.89 ± 8.90 | 10.41 ± 2.61 | 16.92 ± 16.61 | 49.63 | |
| 160 | 9 | 3.29 | 13.89 ± 9.81 | 9.12 ± 2.37 | 28.82 ± 13.45 | 8.41 | |
| 202 | 15 | 0.75 | 5.85 ± 3.59 | 5.35 ± 2.43 | 10.81 ± 10.22 | 7.39 | |
| 116 | 13 | 0.54 | 6.93 ± 3.33 | 5.57 ± 1.95 | 11.98 ± 8.58 | 5.3 | |
| 92 | 12 | 0.22 | 4.98 ± 2.39 | 5.69 ± 1.83 | 17.87 ± 10.51 | 4.31 | |
| 37 | 7 | 0.19 | 4.72 ± 3.14 | 4.25 ± 1.66 | 9.89 ± 13.94 | 2.31 | |
| 18 | 8 | 0.03 | 4.09 ± 1.43 | 4.36 ± 1.56 | 8.55 ± 5.06 | 2.02 | |
| 13 | 6 | 0.08 | 8.64 ± 2.38 | 2.96 ± 1.13 | 12.69 ± 18.56 | 1.58 | |
| 11 | 6 | 0.02 | 4.6 ± 1.35 | 3.69 ± 1.31 | 6.79 ± 4.26 | 1.47 | |
| 9 | 6 | 0.02 | 4.46 ± 1.65 | 3.56 ± 1.72 | 6.29 ± 2.98 | 1.44 | |
| 11 | 5 | 0.01 | 3.61 ± 0.94 | 3.43 ± 0.84 | 6.65 ± 4.60 | 1.25 | |
| 20 | 4 | 0.03 | 4.33 ± 1.35 | 5.61 ± 1.69 | 11.63 ± 7.99 | 1.21 | |
| 30 | 3 | 0.05 | 4.17 ± 1.50 | 3.66 ± 1.46 | 6.07 ± 6.76 | 1.19 | |
| 6 | 5 | 0.01 | 3.43 ± 0.85 | 2.98 ± 0.71 | 3.65 ± 1.84 | 1.17 | |
| 10 | 4 | 0.11 | 7.99 ± 7.63 | 5.12 ± 3.41 | 9.16 ± 9.12 | 1.14 | |
| 9 | 4 | 0.01 | 4.16 ± 1.24 | 3.43 ± 1.35 | 12.38 ± 12.27 | 1.01 | |
| 6 | 4 | 0.04 | 7.43 ± 6.60 | 7.03 ± 3.10 | 18.96 ± 32.82 | 0.99 | |
| 18 | 3 | 0.02 | 3.48 ± 0.63 | 3.26 ± 0.90 | 6.97 ± 6.82 | 0.96 | |
| 5 | 3 | 0.01 | 3.14 ± 0.79 | 4.62 ± 0.79 | 11.52 ± 9.08 | 0.73 | |
| 5 | 2 | 0.03 | 8.18 ± 4.49 | 4.64 ± 1.67 | 15.18 ± 13.16 | 0.54 | |
| 5 | 2 | 0.01 | 3.86 ± 1.01 | 2.93 ± 1.11 | 4.66 ± 1.58 | 0.52 | |
| 5 | 2 | 0.01 | 3.61 ± 0.67 | 3.68 ± 1.60 | 5.62 ± 4.43 | 0.52 | |
| 4 | 2 | 0.01 | 4.65 ± 0.66 | 5.63 ± 0.85 | 5.51 ± 2.21 | 0.5 | |
| 4 | 2 | 0.01 | 7.16 ± 3.23 | 6.01 ± 2.22 | 5.67 ± 2.36 | 0.5 | |
| 4 | 2 | 0.02 | 6.62 ± 2.01 | 4.63 ± 1.08 | 5.73 ± 2.07 | 0.5 | |
| Remaining species(12) | 19 | 8 | 0.11 | 4.82 ± 2.12 | 4.86 ± 1.63 | 13.23 ± 15.09 | 3.41 |
Importance values of Masson pine compared to other woody plant species in five Masson pine forest sites infected for different periods of time by pine wood nematode
| Species | Importance value (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST1 | ST2 | ST3 | ST4 | ST5 | |
| 67.23 | 53.61 | 50.24 | 42.65 | 29.24 | |
| 3.44 | 2.44 | 32.71 | |||
| 6.01 | 4.49 | 3.79 | 13.71 | 3.69 | |
| 2.14 | 3.36 | 10.74 | 5.06 | ||
| 5.06 | 2.18 | 8.18 | 2.44 | ||
| 3.59 | 2.34 | 2.35 | 5.17 | ||
| 2.14 | 2.34 | 2.16 | 2.72 | 2.19 | |
| 2.42 | 2.58 | 1.89 | 2.35 | ||
| 2.04 | 2.27 | 1.87 | 2.54 | ||
| 2.19 | 2.14 | 2.16 | 1.88 | 2.31 | |
| 2.78 | 3.44 | ||||
| 3.69 | 1.86 | ||||
| 3.59 | |||||
| 2.26 | 2.04 | 1.95 | |||
| 2.23 | 2.77 | 2.31 | |||
| 2.62 | 1.86 | ||||
| 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 2.47 | ||
| 2.59 | 2.75 | ||||
| 2.21 | 1.95 | ||||
| 2.46 | |||||
| 2.26 | 2.05 | ||||
| 2.29 | |||||
| 2.2 | |||||
| 1.99 | 2.36 | ||||
| 2.38 | |||||
| Remaining species | 2.2 | 6.24 | 2.05 | 7.44 | 6.78 |
Marginal and conditional effects of environmental variables on plant community structure obtained from the summary of forward selection in redundancy analysis
| Variables | Lambda-A | Lambda-B | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trace | Trace | |||||
| Masson pine stumps (MPS) | 0.18 | 2.95 | 0.002 | 0.18 | 2.95 | 0.002 |
| K+ | 0.17 | 2.57 | 0.014 | 0.14 | 2.31 | 0.026 |
| Capillary water holding capacity (CWHC) | 0.14 | 2.13 | 0.042 | 0.08 | 1.56 | 0.148 |
| Capillary porosity (CP) | 0.13 | 2.02 | 0.049 | 0.05 | 0.82 | 0.622 |
| Soil water content (SWC) | 0.16 | 2.49 | 0.018 | 0.04 | 0.70 | 0.720 |
Describes marginal effects, which show the variance explained when the variable is used as the only factor.
Describes conditional effects, which show the additional variance each variable explains when it is included in the model.
The Monte Carlo permutation with 499 iterations was performed at the 0.05 significance level.
Significant at P < 0.05
Significant at P < 0.01.
Summary of statistical results of the redundancy analysis
| Canonical axes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Total variance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalues | 0.260 | 0.105 | 0.086 | 0.022 | 1 | 1.721 | 0.018 |
| Species-environment correlations | 0.917 | 0.723 | 0.778 | 0.482 | |||
| Cumulative percentage of species variance (%) | 26.0 | 36.5 | 45.1 | 47.3 | |||
| Cumulative percentage of species-environment relation (%) | 53.2 | 74.6 | 92.2 | 96.7 | |||
| Sum of all eigenvalues | 1 | ||||||
| Sum of all canonical eigenvalues | 0.489 |
Significant at P < 0.05.
Figure 4First two canonical axes of the redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination biplot between plant community structure and dominant environmental variables. MPS, Masson pine stumps; K+, the content of K+ at 0–40 cm depth; CWHC, capillary water holding capacity; CP, capillary porosity; SWC, soil water content. 1. Cinnamomum camphora; 2. Pinus massoniana; 3. Quercus aliena; 4. Quercus variabilis; 5. Loropetalum chinensis; 6. Rhus chinensis; 7. Celtis bungeana; 8. Trachycarpus fortunei; 9. Cotinus coggygria; 10. Litsea cubeba; 11. Symplocos paniculata; 12. Rhus typhina; 13.Dalbergia hupeana; 14. Ilex cornuta; 15. Albizia kalkora; 16. Symplocos caudata.