Literature DB >> 2593777

Urine screening for leucocytes and bacteria by dipstick and reflectance spectrophotometry.

B A Barker, J G Ratcliffe, G C Turner.   

Abstract

In order to develop a rapid and reliable method for screening large numbers of urines for leucocytes and bacteria a dipstick method was used with colorimetric reading of colour changes with a reflectance spectrophotometer. One thousand consecutive urine specimens were tested by that method using a single dipstick for leucocyte esterase, nitrite, blood and protein in parallel with routine methods for enumeration of leucocytes by microscopy and quantitative culture for bacteria. Results of the four dipstick tests taken together had predictive values of 83.7% for a positive test for evidence of infection and 97.2% for a negative result. The false negative rate was 1%. Of the 191 urines with a significant bacteriuria (greater than 10(5) organisms/ml), 10 were false negatives by dipstick testing, representing 5% of all infected urines. Elimination of the need for culture on specimens that were negative by all four tests would reduce the workload by 36%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2593777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Lab Sci        ISSN: 0308-3616


  6 in total

1.  Screening of urines with dipstrips: does it reduce workload and consumable costs?

Authors:  A P MacGowan; P Cowling; R J Marshall; D S Reeves
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Screening of urines with dipstrips: could it replace microscopy?

Authors:  R H George
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Can urine dipstick testing for urinary tract infection at point of care reduce laboratory workload?

Authors:  H D Patel; S A Livsey; R A Swann; S S Bukhari
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Measurement of urinary lipopolysaccharide antibodies by ELISA as a screen for urinary tract infection.

Authors:  A P MacGowan; R J Marshall; P Cowling; D S Reeves
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Urinalysis before joint arthroplasty. To dipstick or not? That is the question.

Authors:  D Singh; C Roberts; G Bentley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Utilising low-cost, easy-to-use microscopy techniques for early peritonitis infection screening in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Mark Buckup; Janelle M Kaneda; Alisha M Birk; Eleanor Glockner; Ross Venook; Aditya Jain; Shuchita Sharma; Cynthia Wong; Ken Sutha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.