| Literature DB >> 25937347 |
Corrado Lettieri1, Dennis Zavalloni2, Roberta Rossini3, Nuccia Morici4, Federica Ettori5, Ornella Leonzi6, Azeem Latib7, Marco Ferlini8, Daniela Trabattoni9, Paola Colombo4, Mario Galli10, Giuseppe Tarantini11, Massimo Napodano11, Emanuela Piccaluga12, Enrico Passamonti13, Paolo Sganzerla14, Alfonso Ielasi15, Micol Coccato11, Alessandro Martinoni16, Giuseppe Musumeci3, Roberto Zanini17, Battistina Castiglioni18.
Abstract
The optimal management and short- and long-term prognoses of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) remain not well defined. The aim of this observational multicenter study was to assess long-term clinical outcomes in patients with SCAD. In-hospital and long-term outcomes were assessed in 134 patients with documented SCAD, as well as the clinical impact and predictors of a conservative rather than a revascularization strategy of treatment. The mean age was 52 ± 11, years and 81% of patients were female. SCAD presented as an acute coronary syndromes in 93% of patients. A conservative strategy was performed in 58% of patients and revascularization in 42%. On multivariate analysis, distal versus proximal or mid location of dissection (odds ratio 9.27) and basal Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3 versus 0 or 1 (odds ratio 0.20) were independent predictors of conservative versus revascularization strategy. A conservative strategy was associated with better in-hospital outcomes compared with revascularization (rates of major adverse cardiac events 3.8% and 16.1%, respectively, p = 0.028); however, no significant differences were observed in the long-term outcomes. In conclusion, in this large observational study of patients with SCAD, angiographic features significantly influenced the treatment strategy, providing an excellent short- and long-term prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25937347 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Cardiol ISSN: 0002-9149 Impact factor: 2.778