Literature DB >> 25936634

A combination of topographic and pachymetric parameters in keratoconus diagnosis.

Ibrahim Toprak1, Volkan Yaylalı2, Cem Yildirim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of topographic and pachymetric parameters of Scheimpflug system in keratoconus diagnosis.
METHODS: This study included 183 eyes of 183 patients with keratoconus (keratoconus group) and 131 eyes of 131 age and sex-matched healthy subjects (control group). Mean keratometry (K, front), topographic astigmatism, pupil-center pachymetry, apical pachymetry, thinnest pachymetry (TP), corneal volume and maximum K (Kmax) were obtained from the Scheimpflug imaging system. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the diagnostic ability of each parameter in eyes with ≤ stage 3, ≤ stage 2 and stage 1 keratoconus based on the Amsler-Krumeich grading system.
RESULTS: The Kmax and TP showed the highest individual performance (with sensitivity-specificity of 92.9-92.4% and 89.6-93.3%, respectively) in diagnosis of keratoconus. The AUCs and sensitivity-specificity values for the Kmax/TP and Kmax(2)/TP were calculated to improve the diagnostic performance. As expected, sensitivity-specificity values significantly increased by using Kmax/TP (97.3-94.7% at the level ≥0.08) and Kmax(2)/TP (99.5-95.7% at the level ≥4.1) in discrimination of keratoconic eyes from normals. Moreover, Kmax(2)/TP had very high sensitivity (>99%) and specificity (>94%) in diagnosis of stage 1 and stage 2 keratoconus.
CONCLUSIONS: Although Kmax and TP appear to have high diagnostic ability in keratoconus, the use of either single parameter in isolation might be unsatisfactory in differential diagnosis. Therefore, the Kmax(2)/TP ratio has been introduced, which reflects major characteristics of keratoconus and might be used as an important criterion in keratoconus diagnosis.
Copyright © 2015 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Index; Keratoconus; Maximum keratometry; Pachymetry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25936634     DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  7 in total

1.  Visual Acuity and Refractive Error Improvement in Keratoconic Patients: A Low-Income Context Management Perspective.

Authors:  Walter Kibet Yego; Vanessa Raquel Moodley
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-08-19

2.  5-year follow-up of combined non-topography guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross linking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Mohammed Al-Amri
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Corneal topography in keratoconus: state of the art.

Authors:  F Cavas-Martínez; E De la Cruz Sánchez; J Nieto Martínez; F J Fernández Cañavate; D G Fernández-Pacheco
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

4.  Characteristics of Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Different Stages of Keratoconus.

Authors:  Fereshteh Aslani; Masoud Khorrami-Nejad; Mohammad Aghazadeh Amiri; Hesam Hashemian; Farshad Askarizadeh; Bahram Khosravi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Pentacam® Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part I.

Authors:  Mahsaw N Motlagh; Majid Moshirfar; Michael S Murri; David F Skanchy; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

6.  Keratoconus Detection Based on a New Corneal Volumetric Analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Cavas-Martínez; Laurent Bataille; Daniel G Fernández-Pacheco; Francisco J F Cañavate; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Logistic Regression Model Using Scheimpflug-Placido Cornea Topographer Parameters to Diagnose Keratoconus.

Authors:  Emre Altinkurt; Ozkan Avci; Orkun Muftuoglu; Adem Ugurlu; Zafer Cebeci; Kemal Turgay Ozbilen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.