OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the guided use of the Community Re-engagement Cue to Action Trigger Tool (CRCATT), a patient-mediated question prompt list, and its impact on self-reported re-engagement in activities post-stroke. METHODS: A multi-site, single-blind randomized controlled study in which 77 persons with stroke participated from three rehab organizations in Toronto, Canada. Of the 77 participants, a total 57 within the two groups completed the study and Reintegration to Normal Living Index (mailed response questionnaire) and a sub-set of all participants participated in qualitative interviews. Data collection occurred 3-4 months after enrollment. Quantitative responses were analyzed in SPSS (Chicago, IL, USA) for descriptive frequencies and differences between groups. Qualitative responses were analyzed using an inductive approach with thematic analytic procedures. RESULTS: No between group differences were observed due to small sample size. A multi-variable regression model including age, gender, level of education, treatment group, and language, suggests those with higher education are more likely to participate in activities. Interview analysis revealed participants' ability to recover and re-engage is influenced by an interplay of the CRCATT with external factors. These factors include social support, interactions with providers, and ability to access information. CONCLUSION: The CRCATT was perceived as a useful tool as it assisted persons with stroke to take a more self-directed role in their care by asking relevant questions and anticipating their needs. The tool complemented the external factors that persons with stroke draw on to support recovery and participate in activities post-stroke.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the guided use of the Community Re-engagement Cue to Action Trigger Tool (CRCATT), a patient-mediated question prompt list, and its impact on self-reported re-engagement in activities post-stroke. METHODS: A multi-site, single-blind randomized controlled study in which 77 persons with stroke participated from three rehab organizations in Toronto, Canada. Of the 77 participants, a total 57 within the two groups completed the study and Reintegration to Normal Living Index (mailed response questionnaire) and a sub-set of all participants participated in qualitative interviews. Data collection occurred 3-4 months after enrollment. Quantitative responses were analyzed in SPSS (Chicago, IL, USA) for descriptive frequencies and differences between groups. Qualitative responses were analyzed using an inductive approach with thematic analytic procedures. RESULTS: No between group differences were observed due to small sample size. A multi-variable regression model including age, gender, level of education, treatment group, and language, suggests those with higher education are more likely to participate in activities. Interview analysis revealed participants' ability to recover and re-engage is influenced by an interplay of the CRCATT with external factors. These factors include social support, interactions with providers, and ability to access information. CONCLUSION: The CRCATT was perceived as a useful tool as it assisted persons with stroke to take a more self-directed role in their care by asking relevant questions and anticipating their needs. The tool complemented the external factors that persons with stroke draw on to support recovery and participate in activities post-stroke.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community re-engagement,; Persons with stroke,; Question-prompt list,; Stroke recovery; Trigger tool,