Literature DB >> 25936329

Actual situation of lipoprotein apheresis in Saxony in 2013.

U Emmrich1, B Hohenstein1, U Julius2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an officially accepted therapeutic approach in Germany. Reliable population-based data on the patients are scarce. It is of special interest to learn what are the main indications for this extracorporeal treatment and how many new patients started over the last years.
METHODS: This paper is a summary of the situation of the treatment of high-risk patients via LA in the federal state of Saxony, Germany. The documentation of all patients who agreed to be included into this study have been evaluated. Patients were treated at the University Hospital Dresden (UHD) and in private practices of nephrologists. This evaluation aimed at the characterization of patients treated with LA in Saxony with respect to age, gender, lipid pattern, to the number of new patients per year and the development of the ratio of patients to the Saxon population between 2010 and 2013. The obtained data were compared with the official statistics published by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians for whole Germany.
RESULTS: In 2013, 181 patients, primarily males, were treated in 15 LA centers by 32 doctors. Still, the number of apheresis doctors per 1 million inhabitants is under the average in Germany (Saxony: 7.7/1 million inhabitants, average: 12/1 million inhabitants). The usage of LA is 45 per 1 million inhabitants in Saxony; in comparison to 2010, this is an increase of 16 per 1 million inhabitants. The number of new patients in 2013 with an isolated elevation of Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is twice as high than it was in 2011. The mean duration of all patients being treated with LA, most on a weekly basis, was 5.75 years (UHD: 6.2 years, range: 1 month to 23.1 years; other centers: 5.3 years, range: 1 month to 19.2 years). About 19.3% of all patients suffered from elevated triglyceride (TG) levels (>5 mmol/L). Non-high- density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) was calculated, which is also acutely reduced by LA sessions. The following data were reported for those patients who are treated outside the UHD: risk factors such as hypertension and familial predisposition could be seen in almost every patient, and several others such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, genetic defects and obesity were also present. Almost all patients had suffered from cardiovascular events (CVE) occurring before the start of apheresis treatment. LA therapy led to a reduction in occurrence of CVE during LA therapy. In particular, patients with an isolated increased Lp(a) had the highest reduction when comparing CVE before and during apheresis therapy. In the official statistics published by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians the number of LA patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is clearly too high. Moreover, these statistics do not include patients who are treated at hospitals like the UHD.
CONCLUSION: All in all it can be shown that the extracorporeal therapy is performed effectively in Saxony, and that more centers than 2010 (additional 5) were conducting this therapy when lipid-lowering medication was not sufficiently effective. It is certain that the number of patients requiring LA will increase in the future.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherogenic risk; Cardiovascular diseases; LDL cholesterol; Lipoprotein apheresis; Lipoprotein(a); Saxony (Germany)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25936329     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2015.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atheroscler Suppl        ISSN: 1567-5688            Impact factor:   3.235


  4 in total

1.  Long-term lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of severe familial hypercholesterolemia refractory to high intensity statin therapy: Three year experience at a lipoprotein apheresis centre.

Authors:  Agnieszka Mickiewicz; Justyna Borowiec-Wolna; Witold Bachorski; Natasza Gilis-Malinowska; Rafał Gałąska; Grzegorz Raczak; Magdalena Chmara; Bartosz Wasąg; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Marcin Fijałkowski; Marcin Gruchała
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  Lipoprotein apheresis in the management of severe hypercholesterolemia and of elevation of lipoprotein(a): current perspectives and patient selection.

Authors:  Ulrich Julius
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-10-13

Review 3.  Current Role of Lipoprotein Apheresis in the Treatment of High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Julius
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2018-05-09

Review 4.  Lipoprotein(a) Lowering-From Lipoprotein Apheresis to Antisense Oligonucleotide Approach.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Greco; Cesare R Sirtori; Alberto Corsini; Marat Ezhov; Tiziana Sampietro; Massimiliano Ruscica
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.