Literature DB >> 25935786

Systematic review and metaanalysis of perinatal outcomes after radiofrequency ablation and bipolar cord occlusion in monochorionic pregnancies.

Kirsten Gaerty1, Ristan M Greer2, Sailesh Kumar3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze perinatal outcomes after selective reduction in monochorionic pregnancies with the use of either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or bipolar cord occlusion (BCO). This was a systematic review and metaanalysis that included all studies with ≥5 cases that described perinatal outcomes after BCO or RFA that were identified in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, COCHRANE, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, Science Direct, and MEDLINE that were published between 1965 and July 2014. For count data, incidence risk ratios (IRR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated with BCO as the reference standard. The analysis included 481 cases of BCO and 320 cases of RFA from 17 studies. The mean median gestations at procedure were 21.1 ± 1.2 weeks (BCO) and 18.8 ± 2.5 weeks (RFA; P = .03). The rate of cotwin death was higher in the RFA group (14.7%) vs the BCO group (10.6%; IRR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.93-2.05; P = .11). The live birth rate was 81.3% for the RFA group and 86.7% in the BCO group (IRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80-1.09; P = .41). BCO had higher neonatal death rates (8.1%) vs RFA (4.5%; IRR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30-1.04; P = .07). Overall survival was 76.8% for RFA and 79.1% for BCO (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.82-1.14; P = .72); however, none of these differences were statistically significant. Preterm premature rupture of membranes occurred in 17.7% of RFA cases and 28.2% of the BCO cases (IRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.91; P = .01). The mean median gestational age at delivery was 34.7 ± 1.7 weeks in the RFA group and 35.1 ± 1.6 weeks in the BCO group. Our data do not demonstrate clearly the superiority of 1 procedure over the other. The clinical situation and preference of the operator are important considerations. Rates of preterm delivery and preterm premature rupture of membranes remain substantial for both procedures.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bipolar cord occlusion; fetal reduction; metaanalysis; monochorionic; radiofrequency; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25935786     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Care Levels for Fetal Therapy Centers.

Authors:  Ahmet A Baschat; Sean B Blackwell; Debnath Chatterjee; James J Cummings; Stephen P Emery; Shinjiro Hirose; Lisa M Hollier; Anthony Johnson; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Francois I Luks; M Kathryn Menard; Lawrence B McCullough; Julie S Moldenhauer; Anita J Moon-Grady; George B Mychaliska; Michael Narvey; Mary E Norton; Mark D Rollins; Eric D Skarsgard; KuoJen Tsao; Barbara B Warner; Abigail Wilpers; Greg Ryan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 7.623

2.  Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of the pump twin in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence treated by radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Katsusuke Ozawa; Seiji Wada; Jin Muromoto; Rika Sugibayashi; Yuka Sano Wada; Yushi Ito; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 3.242

3.  Fetoscopic Laser Ablation for the Selective Fetal Reduction in Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome Stage II-IV: The Experience of a New Fetal Medicine Center.

Authors:  Nguyen Duy Anh; Ho Sy Hung; Nguyen Thi Sim; Nguyen Thi Thu Ha; Duc Lam Nguyen; Nguyen Duy Bac; Hoang Van Tong; Yves Ville; Phan Thi Huyen Thuong
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Correlation analysis of adverse outcomes for the selective reduction of twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Li Gao; Qian-Qian Xu; Shan Wang; Yuan-Qing Xia; Xin-Rong Zhao; Yi Wu; Ren-Yi Hua; Jin-Ling Sun; Yan-Lin Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction in complicated Monochorionic twins; comparing the outcomes according to the indications.

Authors:  Fatemeh Rahimi-Sharbaf; Marjan Ghaemi; Ahmed A Nassr; Alireza A Shamshirsaz; Mahboobeh Shirazi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Nan Li; Jimei Sun; Jiayan Wang; Wei Jian; Jing Lu; Yonghui Miao; Yufan Li; Fei Chen; Dunjin Chen; Xiaoqing Ye; Min Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  The Metabolic Signatures of Surviving Cotwins in Cases of Single Intrauterine Fetal Death During Monochorionic Diamniotic Pregnancy: A Prospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Xiyao Liu; Huijia Fu; Li Wen; Fangyu Zhu; Yue Wu; Zhi Chen; Richard Saffery; Chang Chen; Hongbo Qi; Chao Tong; Philip N Baker; Mark D Kilby
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-04-08

8.  Comparison of Prenatal and Neonatal Outcomes of Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies with or Without Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome After Radiofrequency Ablation.

Authors:  Fatemeh Rahimi-Sharbaf; Mahboobeh Shirazi; Fatemeh Golshahi; Zohreh Salari; Mansoureh Haghiri; Marjan Ghaemi; Hanieh Feizmahdavi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2022-09

Review 9.  Fetal therapies as standard prenatal care in Japan.

Authors:  Haruhiko Sago; Seiji Wada
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-02-18

10.  Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jialei Xie; Ziyi Cheng; Tianchen Wu; Yuan Wei; Xiaoli Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.