| Literature DB >> 25935205 |
Naoki Yoshimura1, Kazuaki Fukahara2, Akio Yamashita2, Yoshinori Doki2, Katsunori Takeuchi2, Tomonori Higuma2, Kazutaka Senda2, Masayoshi Toge2, Tatsuro Matsuo2, Saori Nagura2, Masaya Aoki2, Kimimasa Sakata2, Mari Sakai2.
Abstract
In this review article, we describe several topics, including the sandwich technique, the transatrial re-endocardialization technique, the limited apical left ventriculotomy approach and device closure. The sandwich technique was introduced for the closure of muscular ventricular septal defects (VSD) by sandwiching the septum between two felt patches placed in the left and right ventricle. This technique requires neither the transection of muscular trabeculae nor ventriculotomy. Although the sandwich technique has resulted in the improvement of surgical outcomes, cases of postoperative cardiac dysfunction have been reported. Multiple smaller VSDs have been closed with transatrial re-endocardialization. Septal dysfunction may be avoided through this technique, in which the septal trabeculae are approximated in two layers of superficial, endocardial running sutures. Recently, a number of reports have recommended a limited apical left ventriculotomy approach. With this technique, a much shorter incision of around 1 cm at the apex of the left ventricle may be sufficient for achieving the complete closure of apical muscular VSDs. The transcatheter or perventricular device closure of muscular VSDs has increasingly been performed with good results. Although favorable early and mid-term results of device closure have been reported, this method is not always safer or less invasive than surgical closure. Long-term evaluations should be performed to determine whether the right and left ventricular functions are affected by treatment with relatively large devices in the heart.Entities:
Keywords: Device closure; Limited apical left ventriculotomy; Muscular VSD; Sandwich technique; Transatrial re-endocardialization
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25935205 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1180-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Today ISSN: 0941-1291 Impact factor: 2.549