Literature DB >> 25934823

Consensus on the Need for a Hierarchical List of Patient-reported Pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective.

Robin Christensen1,2, Lara J Maxwell3,4, Peter Jüni3,4, David Tovey3,4, Paula R Williamson3,4, Maarten Boers3,4, Niti Goel3,4, Rachelle Buchbinder3,4, Lyn March3,4, Caroline B Terwee3,4, Jasvinder A Singh3,4, Peter Tugwell3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although protocol registration for systematic reviews is still not mandatory, reviewers should be strongly encouraged to register the protocol to identify the methodological approach, including all outcomes of interest. This will minimize the likelihood of biased decisions in reviews, such as selective outcome reporting. A group of international experts convened to address issues regarding the need to develop hierarchical lists of outcome measurement instruments for a particular outcome for metaanalyses.
METHODS: Multiple outcome measurement instruments exist to measure the same outcome. Metaanalysis of knee osteoarthritis (OA) trials, and the assessment of pain as an outcome, was used as an exemplar to assess how Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT), the Cochrane Collaboration, and other international initiatives might contribute in this area. The meeting began with formal presentations of background topics, empirical evidence from the literature, and a brief introduction to 2 existing hierarchical lists of pain outcome measurement instruments recommended for metaanalyses of knee OA trials.
RESULTS: After discussions, most participants agreed that there is a need to develop a methodology for generation of hierarchical lists of outcome measurement instruments to guide metaanalyses. Tools that could be used to steer development of such a prioritized list are the COSMIN checklist (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) and the OMERACT Filter 2.0.
CONCLUSION: We list meta-epidemiological research agenda items that address the frequency of reported outcomes in trials, as well as methodologies to assess the best measurement properties (i.e., truth, discrimination, and feasibility).

Entities:  

Keywords:  COCHRANE COLLABORATION; METAANALYSIS; OMERACT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT

Year:  2015        PMID: 25934823     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  4 in total

1.  Physician-Centered Outcomes for Skin Cancer Treatment: A Single-Day Modified Delphi Process to Assess the Importance of Themes in Skin Cancer Management.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Joseph Sobanko; Naomi Lawrence; Jeremy Bordeaux; Todd Cartee; Eric S Armbrecht; Anit Behera; Christian L Baum; Murad Alam; Ian A Maher
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Augustine C Lee; Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; William F Harvey; Angie Mae Rodday; Chenchen Wang
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Patient-Centered Outcomes for Skin Cancer Management: Utilization of a Patient Delphi Process to Identify Important Treatment Themes.

Authors:  Todd V Cartee; Murad Alam; Eric S Armbrecht; Anit Behera; Naomi Lawrence; Jeremy S Bordeaux; Christian L Baum; Anthony Rossi; Ian A Maher
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Sensitivity to Change of Patient-Preference Measures for Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Data From Two Trials.

Authors:  Matthew J Parkes; Michael J Callaghan; Terence W O'Neill; Laura M Forsythe; Mark Lunt; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.794

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.