Literature DB >> 25934065

Efficiency of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters at subclavian sites.

Leonardo Lorente1, María Lecuona2, Alejandro Jiménez3, Lisset Lorenzo4, Ruth Santacreu4, Silvia Ramos4, Eva Hurtado4, Manuel Buitrago4, María L Mora4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness analyses show that chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine (CHSS)-impregnated catheters reduce catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and central venous catheter (CVC)-related costs. However, no studies have reported the efficiency of CHSS-impregnated catheters for venous access when the risk of CRBSI is low; for example, at the subclavian site. This study determined the cost of a CVC, diagnosis of CRBSI, and antimicrobial agents to treat CRBSI; we did not consider the cost of increased hospital stay.
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients admitted to the intensive care unit at Hospital Universitario de Canarias (Tenerife, Spain) who had a subclavian venous catheter.
RESULTS: Patients with CHSS catheters (n = 353) had a lower incidence density of CRBSI (2.12 vs 0 out of 1,000 catheter-days; P = .02) and lower CVC-related cost per catheter-day (3.35 ± 3.75 vs 3.94 ± 9.95; P = .002) than those with standard catheters (n = 518). CHSS-impregnated catheters were associated with a lower risk of CRBSI (exact logistic regression) (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, -∞ to 0.667; P = .008) than standard catheters when controlling for catheter duration. CHSS-impregnated catheters were also associated with a lower CVC-related cost per catheter day than standard catheters (Poisson regression) (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.873; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: CHSS-impregnated catheters may be efficient in preventing CRBSI in patients with subclavian venous access.
Copyright © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteremia; Central venous catheter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25934065     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  5 in total

1.  What is new for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections?

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 3.  Beyond conventional antibiotics - New directions for combination products to combat biofilm.

Authors:  Danir Fanisovich Bayramov; Jennifer Ann Neff
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Multistate programme to reduce catheter-associated infections in intensive care units with elevated infection rates.

Authors:  Jennifer Meddings; M Todd Greene; David Ratz; Jessica Ameling; Karen E Fowler; Andrew J Rolle; Louella Hung; Sue Collier; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.

Authors:  Niccolò Buetti; Jonas Marschall; Marci Drees; Mohamad G Fakih; Lynn Hadaway; Lisa L Maragakis; Elizabeth Monsees; Shannon Novosad; Naomi P O'Grady; Mark E Rupp; Joshua Wolf; Deborah Yokoe; Leonard A Mermel
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.520

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.