Literature DB >> 25934035

The 3-second auditory conditioned stimulus is a more effective stressor than the 20-second auditory conditioned stimulus in male rats.

Y Kiyokawa1, K Mikami2, Y Mikamura2, A Ishii2, Y Takeuchi2, Y Mori2.   

Abstract

Using fear-conditioning model, we have used a 3-s auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) as a stressor and observed fear and stress responses during a specific experimental period regardless of the presence or absence of the CS. Because the CS was extremely short compared with the experimental period, we observed responses primarily in the absence of the CS. In contrast, most studies in the literature have analyzed responses in the presence of the CS. Therefore, the characteristics of fear and stress responses in the absence of the CS remain to be clarified. To clarify this, we compared the characteristics of fear and stress responses elicited by a 3-s auditory CS with those observed during a 20-s auditory CS. The basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA), but not the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), participated in the fear response elicited by the 3-s CS, whereas both the BLA and BNST were involved in the response observed during the 20-s CS. Additional analyses revealed that the BNST participated in the fear response during the 20-s CS when the CS was paired with a 0.75-mA, but not with a 0.9-mA, foot shock, and to the contextual CS. In addition, the fear response elicited by the 3-s CS was more resistant to extinction than that during the 20-s CS. Finally, the 3-s CS produced more intense freezing and corticosterone secretion than the 20-s CS. On the basis of these characteristics, we conclude that the 3-s auditory CS is a more effective stressor than the 20-s auditory CS. Our findings also suggest that foot shock intensity is an additional determinant in the type of fear response induced by the CS.
Copyright © 2015 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CS duration; auditory fear conditioning; bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; corticosterone; foot shock intensity; sustained fear response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25934035     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.04.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  7 in total

1.  Contributions of the Central Extended Amygdala to Fear and Anxiety.

Authors:  Alexander J Shackman; Andrew S Fox
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Active place avoidance is no more stressful than unreinforced exploration of a familiar environment.

Authors:  Edith Lesburguères; Fraser T Sparks; Kally C O'Reilly; André A Fenton
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Role of glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanisms in cocaine memory enhancement.

Authors:  S J Stringfield; J A Higginbotham; R Wang; A L Berger; R J McLaughlin; R A Fuchs
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  The right central amygdala shows greater activation in response to an auditory conditioned stimulus in male rats.

Authors:  Yasushi Kiyokawa; Daichi Takahashi; Yukari Takeuchi; Yuji Mori
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis regulates fear to unpredictable threat signals.

Authors:  Travis D Goode; Reed L Ressler; Gillian M Acca; Olivia W Miles; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Existence of wild brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) that are indifferent to novel objects.

Authors:  Ryoko Koizumi; Yasushi Kiyokawa; Kazuyuki D Tanaka; Goro Kimura; Tsutomu Tanikawa; Yukari Takeuchi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Structural differences in the brain between wild and laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus): Potential contribution to wariness.

Authors:  Ryoko Koizumi; Yasushi Kiyokawa; Kaori Mikami; Akiko Ishii; Kazuyuki D Tanaka; Tsutomu Tanikawa; Yukari Takeuchi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.267

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.