Literature DB >> 25933668

Five years of phenological monitoring in a mountain grassland: inter-annual patterns and evaluation of the sampling protocol.

Gianluca Filippa1, Edoardo Cremonese2, Marta Galvagno2, Mirco Migliavacca3,4, Umberto Morra di Cella2, Martina Petey2, Consolata Siniscalco5.   

Abstract

The increasingly important effect of climate change and extremes on alpine phenology highlights the need to establish accurate monitoring methods to track inter-annual variation (IAV) and long-term trends in plant phenology. We evaluated four different indices of phenological development (two for plant productivity, i.e., green biomass and leaf area index; two for plant greenness, i.e., greenness from visual inspection and from digital images) from a 5-year monitoring of ecosystem phenology, here defined as the seasonal development of the grassland canopy, in a subalpine grassland site (NW Alps). Our aim was to establish an effective observation strategy that enables the detection of shifts in grassland phenology in response to climate trends and meteorological extremes. The seasonal development of the vegetation at this site appears strongly controlled by snowmelt mostly in its first stages and to a lesser extent in the overall development trajectory. All indices were able to detect an anomalous beginning of the growing season in 2011 due to an exceptionally early snowmelt, whereas only some of them revealed a later beginning of the growing season in 2013 due to a late snowmelt. A method is developed to derive the number of samples that maximise the trade-off between sampling effort and accuracy in IAV detection in the context of long-term phenology monitoring programmes. Results show that spring phenology requires a smaller number of samples than autumn phenology to track a given target of IAV. Additionally, productivity indices (leaf area index and green biomass) have a higher sampling requirement than greenness derived from visual estimation and from the analysis of digital images. Of the latter two, the analysis of digital images stands out as the more effective, rapid and objective method to detect IAV in vegetation development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass; Digital camera; Ecosystem phenology; Grassland; Greenness; Leaf area index; Subalpine belt

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25933668     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-015-0999-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  18 in total

1.  Forecasting phenology: from species variability to community patterns.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Diez; Inés Ibáñez; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Susan J Mazer; Theresa M Crimmins; Michael A Crimmins; C David Bertelsen; David W Inouye
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity.

Authors:  Andrew D Richardson; T Andy Black; Philippe Ciais; Nicolas Delbart; Mark A Friedl; Nadine Gobron; David Y Hollinger; Werner L Kutsch; Bernard Longdoz; Sebastiaan Luyssaert; Mirco Migliavacca; Leonardo Montagnani; J William Munger; Eddy Moors; Shilong Piao; Corinna Rebmann; Markus Reichstein; Nobuko Saigusa; Enrico Tomelleri; Rodrigo Vargas; Andrej Varlagin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Monitoring plant phenology using digital repeat photography.

Authors:  Michael A Crimmins; Theresa M Crimmins
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  21st century climate change in the European Alps--a review.

Authors:  Andreas Gobiet; Sven Kotlarski; Martin Beniston; Georg Heinrich; Jan Rajczak; Markus Stoffel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Comparing land surface phenology derived from satellite and GPS network microwave remote sensing.

Authors:  Matthew O Jones; John S Kimball; Eric E Small; Kristine M Larson
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Modeling greenup date of dominant grass species in the Inner Mongolian Grassland using air temperature and precipitation data.

Authors:  Xiaoqiu Chen; Jing Li; Lin Xu; Li Liu; Deng Ding
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.787

7.  Small-scale variation in ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an alpine meadow depends on plant biomass and species richness.

Authors:  Mitsuru Hirota; Pengcheng Zhang; Song Gu; Haihua Shen; Takeo Kuriyama; Yingnian Li; Yanhong Tang
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers.

Authors:  David W Inouye
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Phenological response of grassland species to manipulative snowmelt and drought along an altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Christine Cornelius; Annette Leingärtner; Bernhard Hoiss; Jochen Krauss; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Annette Menzel
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications.

Authors:  Ellen G Denny; Katharine L Gerst; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Geraldine L Tierney; Theresa M Crimmins; Carolyn A F Enquist; Patricia Guertin; Alyssa H Rosemartin; Mark D Schwartz; Kathryn A Thomas; Jake F Weltzin
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.787

View more
  4 in total

1.  The rise of phenology with climate change: an evaluation of IJB publications.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Rong Yu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  'Hearing' alpine plants growing after snowmelt: ultrasonic snow sensors provide long-term series of alpine plant phenology.

Authors:  Yann Vitasse; Martine Rebetez; Gianluca Filippa; Edoardo Cremonese; Geoffrey Klein; Christian Rixen
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Extracting Plant Phenology Metrics in a Great Basin Watershed: Methods and Considerations for Quantifying Phenophases in a Cold Desert.

Authors:  Keirith A Snyder; Bryce L Wehan; Gianluca Filippa; Justin L Huntington; Tamzen K Stringham; Devon K Snyder
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Comparison of Landsat and Land-Based Phenology Camera Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for Dominant Plant Communities in the Great Basin.

Authors:  Keirith A Snyder; Justin L Huntington; Bryce L Wehan; Charles G Morton; Tamzen K Stringham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.