Literature DB >> 25933583

Factors associated with the differential in actual gestational age and gestational age predicted from transrectal ultrasonography in pregnant dairy cows.

A M Fitzgerald1, D P Ryan2, D P Berry3.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine (1) how gestational age predicted using transrectal ultrasonography related to actual gestational age derived as the number of days from the most recent artificial insemination date, (2) what factors, if any, were associated with the differential between the two measures, and (3) the association between this differential in gestational age and the likelihood of subsequent pregnancy loss, stillbirth, or calving dystocia. The data set contained 7340 ultrasound records from 6805 Holstein Friesian dairy cows in 175 herds. Ultrasonography assessment underestimated gestational age relative to days since last service by 0.51 days (standard error [SE]: 0.040), although the differential was less during embryonic development phase (i.e., ≤42 days of gestation; mean overestimation of 0.31 days) versus fetal development phase (i.e., >42 days of gestation; mean underestimation of 0.81 days). Predicted calving date calculated from ultrasonography was 1.41 days (SE: 0.040) later than the actual subsequent calving date and was, on average, 0.52 days later than predicted calving date, assuming a gestation length of 282 days. Parity of the dam (P < 0.05), stage of pregnancy (P < 0.001), and sex of the calf born (P < 0.001) were all associated with the differential in gestational age based on ultrasonography versus days since last service. No obvious trend among parities was evident in the difference between the methods in predicting gestational age. Ultrasonography underestimated gestational age by 0.83 (SE: 0.15) days in parity 5+ cows and underestimated gestational age by 0.41 (SE: 0.14) days in the first-parity cows. Relative to gestational age predicted from the most recent service, ultrasonography underestimated gestational age by 0.75 (SE: 0.13) days for heifer fetuses and underestimated gestational age by 0.36 (SE: 0.13) days for bull fetuses. The heritability of the differential in gestational age between the methods of prediction was low 0.05 (SE: 0.022), corroborating heritability estimates for most cow reproductive traits. Overestimation of gestational age using ultrasonography was associated with an increased likelihood of pregnancy loss (P < 0.001). Gender of calf born (P < 0.001), sire breed of calf (P < 0.001), and parity (P < 0.001) were all associated with gestation length. Gestation length was 1.27 days longer (SE: 0.01) for bull calves compared to heifer calves. Calves from beef sires had a longer gestation length than calves from dairy sires, and older parity cows had a longer gestation length than younger cows. The results highlight factors associated with differences in gestational age obtained from ultrasonography and insemination data and illustrate the value of ultrasonography for the prediction of calving date and pregnancy loss.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dystocia; Gestational age; Pregnancy loss; Stillbirth; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25933583     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  Genomic Regions Associated With Gestation Length Detected Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data Differ Between Dairy and Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Deirdre C Purfield; Ross D Evans; Tara R Carthy; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Postpartum Uterine Involution and Embryonic Development Pattern in Chinese Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Yuxin Lin; Hongzhen Yang; Muhammad Jamil Ahmad; Yuze Yang; Wucai Yang; Hasan Riaz; Adili Abulaiti; Shujun Zhang; Liguo Yang; Guohua Hua
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-22

3.  Sonogram of coccygeus muscle in dairy cows with different gestational ages.

Authors:  Mokhamad Fakhrul Ulum; Dilla Frastantie; Bambang Purwantara
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.